Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Canadian Cardinal
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Canadian Cardinal

by Lindy Martin

Gallery: AvianPosted February 2, 2010105 views6 comments
How do I get better detail? Is this a side lighting issue (Exposure comp) or a focusing issue? I can't seem to get detail in the feathers except for the tail. Thanks in advance.

D300 1/60 F14 iso 400 (nikon 300mm F4) Tripod spot metered and no exposure compensation. :confused:

Comments

6 comments
Comment posted by Dave Courtenay on February 2, 2010 at 9:31 PM
Hi Lindy
I also shoot with a D300, May i ask why F14 or is that a typo, I am wondering as you say there is no compensation was the image very dark and needed to be lightened in photoshop, There is snow on the ground so compensation would be needed, In this situation i spot meter off of the snow and add 2 stops so +2 and as long as the bird is in the same light as the snow you metered off of you will get a good exposure, Did your histogram look good or was it way to the left
Hope this helps

Dave
Registered on July 18, 2005, 56 Posts, 462 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on February 2, 2010 at 10:22 PM
I really don't think it's a focusing issue. May just be the 1/60 exposure is just too slow-even on a tripod unless you used a cable release. And you can't trust the bird, or wind, not to move. The male cardinal is a tough focus problem anyway-red is harder than it seems it should be. You also don't comment on post-processing procedures. Sharpening, unsharp mask etc. This could probably be sharpened at 100-125% radius .2 or even .3 for your personal use and then use the unsharp mask before posting to the net.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Lindy Martin on February 2, 2010 at 10:27 PM
Good questions Dave: I had to look back at the exif - the bird is cropped about 70% - in the original the snow is blown out. I used f14 because I wanted more detail around the bird in the trees etc. You are right, the histogram is to the left. I will definitely try it with your metering tricks. I did not alter the image except to crop it down to this size. To be honest, I don't know enough about Lightroom or CS3 to alter images well.
Registered on March 10, 2009, 60 Posts, 169 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on February 2, 2010 at 10:39 PM
I used to have a Nikon 300 f4, it was wicked sharp. Have you tried shooting some test subjects with everything locked down and then view the results at 100%. I'm not into pixel peeping, but a systematic approach is about the only way to nail down the culprit. 1/60 will require flawless technique. The crumy ball head (brand name withheld) I used, back in the day, was a source of a lot of my unsharp photos.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on February 3, 2010 at 8:14 AM
I'm in agreement with others here, Lindy: I think that the low exposure time is your main culprit. The tripod takes care of your camera motion but that little bird doesn't have to move much to spoil your detail.
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on February 3, 2010 at 9:01 PM
Lindy

I would not have used f14 for the aperture in this, perhaps f8 to f9, that would have given you more shutter speed and may have reduced the softness you see here. A tiny breeze at 1/60 can cause some motion blur.

I like the pose of the cardinal, it seems relaxed but alert too.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments