Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Junco 12-23
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Junco 12-23

by Bruce Van Valen

Gallery: AvianPosted December 30, 200996 views10 comments
50D, 100-400mm, tripod mounted.
1/60s @ 5.6, -.33, 400 ISO

Realistically I know I had no business bothering to shoot at these low speeds but on this one I think I got lucky. I love his expression and the color of the background in the late afternoon light.
I am still new to this and am having a hard time fighting with balancing the ISO against the noise that I am getting if I bump it up. Noise reduction in PS3 helps but doesn't always get the job done.
Any advice on handling the ISO/ss/noise issue would be greatly appreciated.

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by Bryan Hix on December 30, 2009 at 9:21 AM
I like the sharpness, HA, and BG on this. I would be curious to see the histogram if you had "0" comp. I have a 50D also and I am with you about the noise on that camera especially over 400 (I use the noiseware plugin). You might consider lightening up the shadowed area a little bit and if it were mine, I would clone out the white seeds on the perch and maybe move the bird to the right a little so it's not so centered. Solid capture. :smile:
Registered on June 13, 2008, 117 Posts, 755 Comments
Comment posted by Ravee Wattanatanak on December 30, 2009 at 9:52 AM
Very cute bird you got there.
Registered on December 12, 2008, 105 Posts, 786 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on December 30, 2009 at 10:44 AM
Very nice Junco, Bruce. I find these birds to be very photogenic. Beautiful detail on the head, where it counts. My policy on winter shots in the dark Northwest is to go with the highest iso my camera will allow with acceptable noise (about iso 800 on the 40D, though I prefer 640), and trade off shutter speed and dof as best I can. Perching birds can sometimes give you surprisingly good results down to 1/30 or so. You might look at after market noise reduction software. Some of it works better than the Photoshop stuff. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on December 30, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Bruce,

Your settings seem to have worked out very nicely for this image, I like the head turn, details and pose of the junco a lot.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on December 30, 2009 at 4:55 PM
I go along with Brian's comments on this one Bruce. I have a 50D and I use NeatImage Plug In to help with noise in the BGs.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Charlie VanTassel on December 30, 2009 at 10:01 PM
One thing that is key is that at higher iso's you really need to get the exposure right in camera. If you try to use too fast a shutter speed and underexpose, lightening the photo later in PS will introduce a lot of noise. This one looks pretty darn good. :toast: :toast:
Registered on October 18, 2006, 644 Posts, 4801 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on December 30, 2009 at 11:55 PM
Wonderful detail and sharpness at 1/60! Nice head turn too

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Sharon Hallowell on December 31, 2009 at 8:40 PM
I shoot the same combo and have the same trouble...getting it right in camera helps a lot, and I also will purposely overexpose sometimes. Noise is always worse during processing when trying to lighten a photo, but is usually ok when darkening up to a stop. That being said...anything over 640 really isn't worth the shot.
You did a nice job here...the bird really pops at you, so the small amount of noise you have doesn't bother me. Shaorn
Registered on November 1, 2003, 392 Posts, 4810 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on January 1, 2010 at 12:42 AM
Wow, I would say pretty good with that slow ss. It looks pretty sharp to me. That's what the tripod is for and I believe makes it worth luggin around
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Patricia Brundage on January 6, 2010 at 10:45 PM
Nice shot Bruce. Very dramatic choice of comp and background. I too use the 100-400 combination with a 40D and find that I cannot shoot even at 400 without the picture breaking up completely... much worse with a plain blue background. I've tried with the in-camera noise reduction settings (in custom functions) with no better results. I've resorted to selecting the areas I want in focus, inverting, and using the blur function in CS3. Not the ultimate solution, but saved a few using it. Canon really should get its act together.
Registered on March 23, 2006, 1111 Posts, 6531 Comments