Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

Metal Prints

Discussion

6 replies
Posted by Brian Schrayer on July 4, 2017 at 8:14 PM
Metal Prints
I received a request for an image on a metal print (not metallic paper, but printed on a metal surface).  I read through the archives in this forum and read some mixed reviews, but the posts were older and the technology was still relatively new. 

Have any of you printed on metal and if so how did you like the results?  I have used Aspen Creek Photo for printing in the past and have been satisfied with the quality of their prints and I know that they use a color managed workflow.  However, I have never had an image printed on metal. 

Also, from what I read in the older posts it sounds like some photos work well for metal prints while others do not.

Also is there anything different that I would need to do from a processing perspective?  This is obviously a low contrast image with deep shadows so I'm not sure how it would print in this format.  

I would also also have a proof made on paper and talk to someone at Aspen Creek before printing it on metal.

The photo in question is the one shown here.

Thank you in advance for any suggestions you can offer!
Posted by Doug Koepsel on July 4, 2017 at 9:13 PM
Brian, a friend had a metal print and one on Fuji-flex from the same file.  The detail, depth and dynamic range was better on the metal. This was more noticeable in the shadows.  This convinced me to go from Fuji Pearl to metal.  Bay Photo came out with a mid-gloss surface to reduce glare on their metal prints, we both tried it, and both thought it lost DR and contrast.  I would stick with a gloss surface.
Posted by Jim DeWitt on July 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM
I have sold several pano shots of American Avocets printed on metal. Mostly glossy, a couple of matte finishes. I used AdoramaPix. They print the itniest bit dark, but the depth and color are wonderful.
Posted by Mike Ramy on July 5, 2017 at 12:41 AM
I have been using metal prints for a few years now with great results. The are more expensive than prints from the lab but are actually cheaper as an end product because you eliminate the need for framing. There are usually two options available, 1) to print directly onto the metal; 2) to print over a white base coat applied to the metal first. In my opinion, after trying both options, the white base coat is the only choice, it delivers more vibrant and richer colors. I use MPix Pro lab and order their Vivid Metal Prints, they seem to have changed their ordering routine lately and I have a metal print currently ordered and due to arrive Monday the 10th and I will know if their is any difference in their processing. It should also be noted that metal prints are ideal for high humidity or wet environments.
Posted by SandyRichardsBrown on July 5, 2017 at 12:45 AM
http://www.naturephotographers.net/imagecritique/bbs.cgi?a=vm&mr=79517&CGISESSID=03068b9a62a059d3dee5b31954f4ffc5&u=27820

I love the metal prints - vibrant colors, fine for our humid coastal climate, look great "floating" on a wall. as Mike said, more expensive up front, but much cheaper overall than printing, framing, getting a mat and glass, etc.
Sandy
Posted by Sharon Hallowell on July 5, 2017 at 12:21 PM
Are they ok to hang out of doors?
 
Posted by Brian Schrayer on July 5, 2017 at 7:34 PM
Thanks to everyone who commented.  This is very helpful!