Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.

3-Section or 4-Section Tripod? Which To Get?

Discussion

8 replies
Posted by Paul DeCesare on February 13, 2014 at 4:32 PM
I'm about to invest in either the Gitzo Systematic GT5532LS or the GT5542LS and I'm trying to decide which to go for. My GUESS is that the 4 section is great for hiking/traveling because it compacts down more when closed. That's not really an important need for me. The 5532 closes only 3 inches longer if I read right. But why have a 3 section over a 4? Is it physically sturdier due to less sections? At this price range I want sturdy sturdy, closed length is irrelevant, so to me the 3 section is the way to go for my needs. I'd just like to hear some feedback before I pull the trigger, in case I'm missing something.

Quick Update, 15 minutes after posting this, I looked at B&H and they have the 4-section for almost $90 cheaper than the 3-section. For THAT I'd go for the 4 section, only if it's as sturdy as a 3.

Thanks!

Paul
Posted by Keith Bauer on February 13, 2014 at 5:57 PM
Paul: I went through the same thought process a few years ago buying a Gitzo. I ended up buying the 4 section. All the specs say the 4 section is as strong / sturdy as the 3 section. I don't have any reason to dispute that after a few years use with my 4 section. I was also concerned about time to set up the tripod. With the Gitzo leg locks, I can unlock all of the sections on a leg at once with one twist by just grabbing all of the leg locks at once so I haven't found any downsides to the 4 section so far. I've used 3 section versions and they are great as well. I was concerned about the length for traveling which prompted my decision after studying. Sounds like folded length for you doesn't matter.
Posted by Paul DeCesare on February 13, 2014 at 6:25 PM
Exactly what I needed to hear, thanks! That 5542LS is considerably cheaper right now at B&H so based on that I'll go for the 4 section. I saw those Series 5 tripods at Imaging USA this year (they held it in Phx) and those things are massive, so I fully believe they are sturdy. Thanks again. Looks like I have a Classified ad to write now! (for my 3531).
Posted by Jim DeWitt on February 13, 2014 at 6:54 PM
I have the 4-section tripod. An added benefit to those already mentioned is that with the tripod head detached it will first in a reasonably-sized bag.

One caveat: the lock rings do wear out over time. They are easy to replace, but not cheap. And with the 4-section there are three more of them.

Other than that it is sturdy, light-weight and durable.
Posted by Paul DeCesare on February 13, 2014 at 9:37 PM
Thanks Jim!
Posted by Tareq Alhamrani on February 14, 2014 at 4:36 AM
I have Gitzo 4-sections as well, older version of series 5 [5540XL i think] and i never have an issue with it, the only cons i found is that it is a little more weight than series 3, but that is good for me to have very sturdy tripod, and i always use series 5 in my country and only i use series 3 which is also 4-sections tripod when i travel due to weight.

Go for 4-section tripod as it is cheaper and don't look back, i am sure you will like it and use it for long long time, i use mine sine 2007 or 2008 and never thinking about another tripod yet.
Posted by Bill Chambers on February 14, 2014 at 10:50 AM
I just posted on your other post, wanting to sell your GT3531. This post may talk you out of the trade possibility. I use the GT5540LS (4 section leg). Sturdiness is NOT an issue at all. You can mount a house on the darn thing. Convenience is an issue however, at least for me. I've always used 3 section legs, but Gitzo didn't make a 3 section 5540 when it first came out so I went with the 4. It's not a huge hassle, but it gets on my nerves every time I use it because it takes an extra 5 seconds to set up. I know, I'm being overly sensitive about that, but that's the way I am I guess. I definitely would go with a 3 section leg if at all possible.
Posted by Paul DeCesare on February 14, 2014 at 12:19 PM
Thanks Tareq, sounds like there's no real drawback to a 4 section other than 3 extra twists (seems to drive Bill nuts though, lol!). I'm realizing now that 3 section pods are noticeably sturdier when you're talking the under $300 range... I had a Manfrotto CF 190 for a while, worked OK for a 5D2 with a 16-35mm, but once the 70-200mm was mounted, it started to go Jello on me.

Bill, thanks for the offer, but I've already begun the ordering process with Adorama, after hammering them for a price match... B&H and Amazon had the same 5542 for almost $200 less, and I have a credit with Adorama to mix up into the purchase, so I'll need to pass on the trade. But thanks!
Posted by Paul DeCesare on February 25, 2014 at 8:17 PM
OK, now I get it. Now that I held the GT5542LS in my hands and set it up and all that, this thing could hold a tree house steady. 4-section being less sturdy than 3-section is irrelevant when the leg diameter is like a tree trunk! Wow, I finally found my stills tripod for life, lol. The 5 series is a massive tripod but the next time I rent a 400mm/2.8, that Gitzo will laugh at me. :cool: