Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Coyote Crucifix
‹ PreviousMan & Fauna Gallery

Coyote Crucifix

by Kent Staubus

Gallery: Man & FaunaPosted October 7, 20068,423 views29 comments
The relationship between landowners and wildlife is often a complicated one. They now see a value to providing some quality habitat for wildlife on their property since it's widely known that increases its value. While landowners welcome an increase in populations of "desirable" creatures, there is still a very deep seated prejudice against other species. These include rattlesnakes, prairie dogs, porkypines, and all of the larger carnivores. Such as coyotes. "Undesirable" animals are often shot on sight.

The near hatred of coyotes is long standing in ranch country. When I ask about it, I'm told that coyotes kill young calves. I personally have my doubts just how often this happens and wonder if the ranchers are simply seeing coyotes eating calves that were stillborn. Over the years I have made a point to mention that coyotes have their role in the ranch's management as they mostly eat mice, rabbits, and especially the "dreaded" prairie dogs. Some ranchers cede the point, althought grudgingly. Many others continue the war begun by the first homesteaders, as is evident in this photo. (In contrast, Lakota people revered the coyote for its cunning and hunting skills.) Despite the unrelenting carnage, coyotes have actually flourished here once their own main predator, the wolf, was eliminated.

My purpose in most of my photos is to show life on the Northern Plains during my life & times. My goal is to take a quality photo that illustrates an aspect of that. My goal is not so much to make a photo of something "beautiful" since not all I see is beautiful.

Perkins County, South Dakota
Nikon F100
Nikon 18-30mm
SB-28 flash on sync cord
Gitzo tripod


Kent in SD

Comments

29 comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on October 7, 2006 at 6:27 PM
Kent: A thought provoking abeit disturbing image. Thanks for the story and lesson. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Arthur Sevestre on October 7, 2006 at 7:25 PM
Kent, I really appreciate this image and the message it conveys. Hats off for taking it. During my time in Canada I have learned a lot about them and I was very much impressed by their natural history. May I ask you what you are going to do with images like this? Any thoughts about publications for example?
Registered on November 1, 2003, 275 Posts, 888 Comments
Comment posted by Duane Rosenkranz on October 7, 2006 at 9:00 PM
If I ran across this I would probably take the shot but maybe not for the same reason. Hanging a dead coyote on a fence does show hatred for the coyote which is sad. Coyotes are often killed needlessly just because they are coyotes, but coyotes also do kill calves, sheep, etc. often at birth. A cow is pretty defenceless while giving birth, I have not seen this personally but I have seen photos. Coyotes are predators, if the opportunity is there they will take advantage.
The problem with photos like this is they are often used, as in this instance, to cause people to think with their hearts and not their heads, which isn't always the best even for the animal in question. I can see both sides of the issue, I hope everyone else can too.
Registered on October 13, 2004, 280 Posts, 2661 Comments
Comment posted by Pete Bengeyfield on October 8, 2006 at 1:35 AM
It's always good to remind us that we still have a ways to go.
Registered on December 2, 2003, 1247 Posts, 3439 Comments
Comment posted by Les McLean on October 8, 2006 at 5:03 AM
A disturbing image, and uncomfortable to view, therefore all the more impact.
Thanks for sharing.
Registered on October 8, 2006, 1 Posts, 10 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Erhardt on October 8, 2006 at 9:21 AM
Kent, a powerful image. Kudos for taking the shot, posting it here and providing the commentary.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 245 Posts, 2421 Comments
Comment posted by bill meikle on October 8, 2006 at 8:21 PM
Shocking image (which makes it important), someone blew away the coyote and hung it there I suppose. I respect the coyote and the environment including the farmers. This kind of falls into documentary photography I suppose. Its a quality record of the event just the same. We need to see all kinds of photography. Personally I dont kill anymore, something you grow out of over the years, now I just respect the environment we live in and I love living in Colorado..

thanks for sharing,

Bill Meikle
Colorado


Registered on May 21, 2006, 173 Posts, 663 Comments
Comment posted by Kent Staubus on October 9, 2006 at 12:52 AM
As I said above, my goal is to simply photo what I see in my daily travels, and photo it as best I can. I do have sympathy for the cattlemen and would have no problem with them shooting a predator hanging around pregnant cows or very young calves. Afterall, they are protecting their livlihood. This particular coyote was killed a couple of miles from a pasture with cattle, and there aren't any small ones this time of year. I know the rancher that shot the coyote about an hour earlier, and pointed out to him that coyotes are about the only predator for porkypines. They are about the only animal the ranchers there hate more than coyotes, I think. I had permission to be on the ranch for rifle/antelope season. As for my images, I have quite a collection. I might do some sort of book when I retire. I'm also considering a gallery show.


Kent in SD
Registered on November 11, 2003, 121 Posts, 2098 Comments
Comment posted by Michael E. Gordon on October 9, 2006 at 11:53 AM
A sad and disturbing image for me to see. I take offense to people killing "my" coyotes on leased public lands (they're mine too).

Steak cows= exotic species
Canis latrans= indigenous
Just a reminder that cattle graze on borrowed land. One should expect to lose a calf every now and again. Perhaps ranching isn't the best job for somone who feels compelled to murder the natives....

As long as this sort of behavior continues, coyote populations will continue to expand. Anyone hear of "fight or flight"? A little education and and study of non-lethal alternatives might do some ranchers a lot of good. Learning to coexist with the native wildlife is a lot richer and more rewarding of an experience....

Registered on November 1, 2003, 90 Posts, 2482 Comments
Comment posted by Kent Staubus on October 9, 2006 at 5:38 PM
Micheal--

All in all, I share many of your sentiments. This particular land was what's called "deeded land," which means the rancher actually owned it. It wasn't BLM. Still, my message to the farmers and ranchers I come across in my travels is that every creature has it's place, it's role, it's job. As we've learned from the past indiscriminate extermination creates bigger problems than what there was to begin with. The coyotes do have a role in keeping the prairie grazing land healthy. And, I point out the West would be a little poorer if we no longer heard the lonesome howl of a coyote as the moon rises in the evening. Right?


Kent in SD
Registered on November 11, 2003, 121 Posts, 2098 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Wong on October 9, 2006 at 6:14 PM
You're a noble man, Kent. I appreciate that you post things on NPN that aren't just postcard pictures such as the ice fishing series you did a while back.
Registered on February 2, 2006, 79 Posts, 2629 Comments
Comment posted by Michael E. Gordon on October 10, 2006 at 11:11 AM
Thanks for your response, Kent. We're on the same page. Deeded land or not, they're still my (and yours) coyotes and don't deserve this sort of hideously disrespectful death. Your images can serve a valuable purpose; put them to work!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 90 Posts, 2482 Comments
Comment posted by Pete D on October 12, 2006 at 10:53 PM
Kent,
If this doesn't get recognized as a Moderator's Pick this week I will rip my shirt off, beat my chest and run through the neighborhood screaming about the unfairness of life. Well, on second thought, maybe I'll just be disappointed. I think the man and nature forum has an often unserved purpose: to illustrate the interaction of man with nature. As you know better than I do, what this photograph shows is not some special, rare event. You are showing us something that is done all the time. I've seen many of these guys on the fence.

Regards, Pete D.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 590 Posts, 1794 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Kayne on October 14, 2006 at 3:22 AM
Great work Kent! It has a real National Geographic feel to it.

Joe.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 573 Posts, 2619 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Minish on October 14, 2006 at 4:37 AM
Its not a pretty picture, but that is often the case where man meets nature. A touch of reality though and a good photograph. The good news is that many ranchers are discovering a cleaner and more effective method of deterrence. The use of Anatolian Shepherd dogs (and other flock guardians) for protecting the flocks/herds are proving to be easier on both the coyotes/wolves and the ranchers. The predators generally prefer to avoid the conflict with the dogs so they stay away and don't have to be killed. In the rare case that they do decide to risk it they usually lose the battle, thus the ranchers are protected when necessary. I know how effective they are because a few years back we had a bunch of chickens and ducks that were continually plagued by hawks, eagles, coyotes and bears. The bears always went over the fence and the coyotes dug under it. We got a couple Anatolians and all the problems went away. Even the bears apparently didn't figure it was worth the risk. The eagles were more persistent but eventually gave it up also, especially after one of them made a dive bombing attempt and left empty handed with only half its tail feathers. I think its a better solution and hope it catches on.
Registered on February 4, 2006, 625 Posts, 3583 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on October 15, 2006 at 8:38 PM
Kent, the image is very thought provoking for both sides of the issue. Although I feel for the rancher and farmers who have a very hard time making a living off the land or livestock, however it does not require posting the animal as a warning or trophy. I say deal with the issue as one might need to, but there IMO is no need to mount any dead or killed animal. Your message for the posting was a well thoughtout one, and also impressive in total explanation. An excellent, but very sad documentary photo. :frown:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on October 23, 2006 at 1:31 PM
Kent,
This photograph is SO powerful. It is also very disturbing; makes me sick. No creature deserves to die like that in disrespect and humiliation all because of the ignorance of a "superior being." This coyote (and too many others) is a martyr.
Thank you for posting this along with your comments.
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Hobson on October 23, 2006 at 1:41 PM
it is a very comforting (and self-delusional) sentiment to point the finger of blame at the individual respnsible for this creature's demise and display, but, assuming that it was a rancher (or someone rancher connected), that person was just an "actor" in the free market economy, which, as we constantly told, always reaches the "right" outcome...

in the case of the consumer wanting fesh meat on the table at a rock-bottom price, well...this is part of the "price"...in enlightened economic theory, it is called "the hidden cost of goods"...

most would prefer that those "costs" remain hidden, or, if not, then place the blame for them on someone else...
Registered on December 3, 2003, 702 Posts, 1062 Comments
Comment posted by Catherine Reilly on October 23, 2006 at 1:41 PM
Yes. Book, gallery show(s), traveling exhibit. Please don't wait until you retire. How about submitting to the BBC's Nature Photography competition? This one, if not others of yours are good candidates, IMHO.
Registered on August 16, 2006, 603 Posts, 9192 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Foss on October 23, 2006 at 9:13 PM
Kent, thanks for sharing that. Good title, too. The larger predators have been villified by stock raisers as long as stock has been raised. That started in Europe and Asia and came here. I've found the attitude still pretty widespread in North Dakota, where I lived a very long time, and Colorado, where I lived less long. Ranchers are very friendly and hospitable people, as a rule, as long as you aren't a predator of the genus Canis or Felis.

Ranchers have a hard time making it. I know this is true. I've herded cows for them and ridden on roundups and lived in ranch country. They eke out their profit on a slim margin. So anything that reduces their ability to produce saleable livestock is a direct threat, and coyotes do kill calves. However, I have no doubt that most times when someone sees a coyote lunching on a calf or cow, it died for other reasons and the coyote is just doing what coyotes do to make a living.

And, on an ironic note, biologists tell us that the surest way to get coyotes to produce larger litters of coyotes is to start killing them and reducing the population. Natural processes kick in then, and more young are developed and born.
Registered on June 7, 2006, 90 Posts, 525 Comments
Comment posted by David C. Kelly on October 26, 2006 at 8:11 AM
Well, that did it's job well...made me hate indiscriminate hunting (and hunters) more than before. As we (man, ranchers) push more and more into the animal's domain it's suddenly means that "we" can kill anything that moves because, by God, "HOW DARE THOSE ANIMALS COME ON MY LAND!!!" The respect for life, both human and animal has diminished to a point that it's scary. Ranchers have always used any excuse to kill the very animals whose hunting grounds they stole and are shocked when the predators eat their livestock. If you see a snake crawl into a hole, do you stick your arm in to see if it will bite? Perhaps if you're stupid. Would you then blame the snake? Kent, it is a sad commentary for man to hang a coyote on the fence as if other coyotes would understand the message. Excellent job of raising awareness.
Registered on August 1, 2006, 24 Posts, 270 Comments
Comment posted by Terry Sohl on October 26, 2006 at 11:14 AM
Kent,

There's a place SW of Presho (Lyman county?) that I love to go for winter raptors. A couple of winters ago, the rancher there had taken the time to take two coyotes he'd shot, and duct-taped each one, spread-eagle, on telephone poles. Lovely.

This is right by a pheasant-hunting operation, with thousands of bred and released pheasants milling around in winter (hence all my raptors I like to come photograph). I wonder if it's the same rancher who was convicted 5 years ago or so for shooting eagles, Gyrfalcons, and hawks because they were eating "his" pheasants.

Sigh.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 513 Posts, 6889 Comments
Comment posted by James Milligan on October 27, 2006 at 11:03 PM
A very graphic image that again illustrates mans lack of understanding of the ecological relationship between the predator and the pray. Ignorance is often the rule yet we must still move forward and educate those who lack the basic understanding of the role that predators play in managing our environment. Sadly, but the individual who pulled the trigger more that likely has an IQ below that of the animal killed.

Jim
Registered on November 1, 2003, 39 Posts, 109 Comments
Comment posted by Andy Richards on October 29, 2006 at 10:29 AM
While I see both sides of this issue, what I don't see is what possible point there is in the "display." Similar to the photos of coyotes duct taped elsewhere, on this forum, in my view that the persons responsible for these are twisted and the action negates any "credibility" for their argument.
Registered on February 24, 2004, 1 Posts, 1 Comments
Comment posted by Henie Reisinger on February 14, 2007 at 1:52 AM
Understanding and empathy for both sides but this is just too damn heartbreaking for me...stark reality just sucks period!

Thanks for sharing your capture.

~Henie~
Registered on January 28, 2007, 188 Posts, 476 Comments
Comment posted by Carol Hyman on April 7, 2007 at 7:23 PM
Kent,

Sometimes there simply aren't any new words to add other than to say thank you for posting this photo.

Hatred of wolves and coyotes is so common and the animals are so misunderstoodl.

Again, thank you.

Carol
http://hy-tec-training.com
Registered on January 18, 2007, 597 Posts, 8062 Comments
Comment posted by David Cobb on December 15, 2007 at 10:51 PM
I saw a lot of this walking across the country on the continental divide. I also saw how much destruction the cattle caused the land. At that point, I quit supporting the beef industry for good. A powerful image that gives an emotional response.

David M. Cobb
Registered on December 14, 2007, 312 Posts, 3243 Comments
Comment posted by Michele Doucette on March 20, 2008 at 10:24 PM
I am sorry but I find these photos disgusting and don't understand the reason to display them? Maybe I am missing the point here? The one of the deer turned my stomach.

I am truly sorry I stumbled across these images.

Michele
Registered on September 11, 2007, 34 Posts, 101 Comments
Comment posted by Douglas Graham on May 22, 2009 at 7:07 PM
I guess I feel exactly like I’m on the other side of the street as Michele Doucette. As a journalist of almost 30 years the photo is the most powerful way to effect change. Photos can relay what words never can and I'm proud that NPN chooses to not hide from hard truths. Nice story telling image and really hard to look at.
Registered on May 14, 2009, 123 Posts, 522 Comments