Thought the BW conversion had this type of feel, hence the title but I think I am running out of clever titles!

I similar comp to a previous color post. Slightly different wave action and cloud position in this image. 3 images were used for this. A base image for most of the shot, plus a shot for the waves running over the far rock and another exposure for the brightest parts of the sky. I squeezed off 5 images in rapid succession to mae sure I got all of the waves action, then finished with a slightly darker exposure for the sky. Thought the contrasty water and sky might make it worth converting to BW, we'll see.
D810, 16-35mm, ISO31, f16, 1 sec., sky 1/15 sec.
Comments
14 commentsI have tried only rudimentary blending, cannot really critique your PP work, but it is not obvious in any way which speaks to how well it looks.....
@ Chris - No, it just has worked for you so you stick with what works for you. If you are happy with the results, no need to try other methods. Today's sensors allow you to get most exposures in one shot, as long as that one shot is perfectly exposed. I just find it freeing that I am able to blend exposures for most lighting which in order to make large prints. I stopped using grad ND filters years ago and haven't looked back. I had more trouble with the transition line / zone than manually blending.
@ Dan - Thanks, I go for the more natural instead of over the top. BW lends itself to more interpretation - I like strong contrasts in general. I think it was the Ansel Adams influence early on. Loved how bold his images looked with contrast and drama.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI.
--P