Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
AuTrain Falls + new crop
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

AuTrain Falls + new crop

by Nick Bristol

Gallery: LandscapePosted October 29, 201718,578 views12 comments
This is another picture I made in Upper Michigan on our recent trip. I always enjoying trying to come up with different views of this falls and this comp was pretty much about the light. I just enjoyed the look here that only lasted a couple of minutes if that and I only made two shots. This is the AuTrane River about 10 miles before it flows into Lake Superior and about 12 miles west of Munising.
5DMK4, 24-105L @105mm, ISO 50, F/16 and 1.3 sec.

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on October 29, 2017 at 2:28 PM
Wonderful set of cascades that make up this beautiful waterfall.  I can see how the light would be very fleeting and you certainly caught some beautiful warm light on the one section of cascades.

I'm not familiar with the location and of course I was there so I don't know what your options were.  I like the wide view as presented, but I'm wondering if you have anything more intimate?  You should have enough pixels... I see an alternate view by cropping a bit more than a third off the left.  There's a clear area for making the crop I think. The only reason I'm thinking of cropping knowing you said you only had a moment before the light went away, is that I would like to see that light on the water a little more closely.

As presented, a wonderful landscape image of the falls. Just wishin' for a tighter view where the light is striking the cascades.  No biggie though.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on October 29, 2017 at 2:59 PM
Thanks Lon! Yes, I had given that some thought as well but decided to go with a wide version. I did a crop here pretty much like what you were thinking and I do like it. I did the new crop and processing from the original and It does show the light better I think. Thanks for the suggestion. Click on the image for larger view. Nick
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on October 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM
Thanks Nick.  I love the repost!  Now the original post was great in terms of showing the beauty and entirey of the falls and so it stands on it's own.  The crop for me does exactly what I'd hoped it would - and more!  By that I mean, not only is the light on the cascades better seen, but now there is a wonderful flow of the water from top left and moving out at the lower right. The scattered leaves at the bottom and the glimmer of forest above make for a complete scene.

BTW, the processing is terrific.  Thanks for sharing the alternate view!

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on October 29, 2017 at 4:02 PM
Nice waterfall and image of it. I prefer the uncropped presentation, although you can't go wrong with the cropped. I like the sense of progression of both the upper and lower cascades in the wider view, although the tighter view does showcase the warm light a little better.  
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Igor Doncov on October 29, 2017 at 5:36 PM
I like the crop Nick. Somehow that lattice of strong verticals and horizontals in a square box feels balanced. I'm looking at this through an iPhone so can't do a fair comparison. But the composition seems stronger in the repost. As Harley says, YMMV. 

Actually. now that I see it on a bigger screen I prefer the original. In the repost the trees seem to come out of the water inexplicably whereas in the original you get a better sense that this is a ledge.
Registered on November 22, 2014, 189 Posts, 2733 Comments
Comment posted by Mattia Oliviero on October 30, 2017 at 8:20 AM
I prefer the cropped version, Nick. The light on the water should really need to be emphasized. 
Registered on August 24, 2016, 43 Posts, 254 Comments
Comment posted by Genny K. on October 30, 2017 at 3:03 PM
I like both images. That wide angle view just begs to be looked at in a huge image, and the crop really brings out those incredible highlights on the water. Really impressive job on the water, I think. It is silky and smooth and looks like it is moving, and the light is just sweet. Really nice!
Registered on June 5, 2006, 132 Posts, 2001 Comments
Comment posted by Rudy Ruberti on October 30, 2017 at 8:18 PM
This does need to be viewed large and I prefer the original, which shows more of that great water.  Wonderful light and nicely done.
Registered on October 28, 2008, 179 Posts, 1875 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Koepsel on October 31, 2017 at 9:55 PM
The light on the water makes it like translucent silver dripping over the edges.  My preference is for the longer original crop as it fits better with the horizontal edges of rock.
Registered on April 1, 2010, 196 Posts, 1592 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Richter on November 1, 2017 at 7:40 AM
Nick, thanks for sharing a view of this impressive scene. In the original version the main area of interest for me without doubt is the right half of the cascades with the beautiful lighting. At the same time the brighter spots of light from the background in the left upper part distract my attention a bit and therefor I would suggest to eliminate them in some way. For me personally it would also be an option to crop the original from the top until the edge of the cascades, even cutting them of slightly in the left part. This way you would keep the sense of majestic width which makes this place unique for me.

Peter
Registered on November 10, 2010, 218 Posts, 2723 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Teller on November 1, 2017 at 9:27 AM
I always appreciate Lon's suggestions a lot, but I tend to like the wider view more. Maybe because I am a big picture type of person so I like more of the environment in the first image. It looks like a very peaceful place. Nice image. 
Registered on August 23, 2010, 1162 Posts, 6692 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on November 13, 2017 at 6:35 PM
Thanks much to all of you for your comments on this. So much appreciated! Nick
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments