Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Snipe Hunt w/ Repost
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Snipe Hunt w/ Repost

by Jim DeWitt

Gallery: AvianPosted June 18, 20162,308 views17 comments
Canon 1D-X, 500mm f4 x 1.4 TC, handheld from truck window
f5.6, 1/640, ISO1000

The classic pose, along Farm to Market Road, Valley County, Idaho.

80% of full frame. Slight sharpening to the bird. 

C & C, please. Thanks for looking.

Comments

17 comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on June 18, 2016 at 12:37 PM
Great capture, but a little dark. I would lighten this one up quite a bit. It should then pop, with that nice background.
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Zablotny on June 18, 2016 at 2:31 PM
Hi Jim,

I like the pose and composition of your snipe photo.  Looks dark on my monitor--a slight brightening up of the plumage and eye leaving the bill as is would be my only suggestion.  Other than that, I like what you've done here........................Jim
Registered on January 17, 2004, 705 Posts, 3594 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on June 18, 2016 at 3:28 PM
Nice bird, nice background. As presented it is very dark. 
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on June 18, 2016 at 4:52 PM
Great pose, perch, background, and detail.
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by Floyd Hopper on June 18, 2016 at 7:06 PM
I agree with Jerry's comments.  Great bg.
Registered on May 1, 2009, 652 Posts, 762 Comments
Comment posted by S Govindarajan on June 18, 2016 at 7:52 PM
Excellent background and comp to showcase the snipe, Jim. As others have noted, this a a tad dark, but that's an easy fix.
Registered on April 19, 2008, 115 Posts, 1921 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on June 18, 2016 at 10:41 PM
Nice, Jim.  I agree with the other comments on lightening the bird even though I know it's back lit.

devil
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on June 18, 2016 at 11:49 PM
I used Levels to pull up the whites and did some selective brightening as well. The image is brighter but isn't what I photographed in the field.

Let me know what you think.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on June 19, 2016 at 11:07 AM
My sense is that the contrast differential between the snipe and background remains the same.  I like the brightness in the snipe in the repost, but would consider darkening the background to give the bird more pop.

Richard Ditch offered this advice on one of my posts and it seems to work: 
"I agree about the brightness of the BG. Try this - select the starling, invert the selection to get everything else, and with the inverted selection active add a new adjustment layer. It doesn't matter which type as you aren't going to make any adjustments. Just set the blend mode for the new layer to Multiply and that will darken everything but the starling. Then pull down the intensity to about 50%."

Or in this case it might be easier to do a hue/saturation layer and darken the green background.
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on June 19, 2016 at 2:01 PM
I tend to agree with Allen on this one, Jim.  I agree that the repost isn't what you saw in the field, but faithful representations don't always make the best images.  It depends on whether you're trying to document what you saw or create a pleasing image-they don't always agree.  I usually select the bird and put it on a separate layer for sharpening. In cases like this where I might want to make selective adjustments to brightness or saturation, it's easy to adjust both the bg layer and the bird layer to get the results I like.  Sometimes I combine the perch with the bird layer and sometimes not.

devil
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Hans Overduin on June 19, 2016 at 2:43 PM
Nice pose and background. Love these guys ! A may agree with Jerry that the image could use maybe a little more light. Other than that, a fine image cool. Cheers, Hans
Registered on August 31, 2011, 491 Posts, 3807 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on June 19, 2016 at 5:21 PM
I often face this choice as well - keep the image as close to what I recall from the field, or optimize it for web presentation. I've drifted more to optimizing the image these days.

I like the brighter presentation of the snipe in the repost, and I don't mind the brightness of the background. But it could go darker to make the lightened snipe stand out a little more.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Pramod.Shanbhag on June 20, 2016 at 4:14 AM
Repost looks better.However BG and perch have got highlighted.For local changes NIK software comes in handy.
Registered on May 17, 2016, 29 Posts, 68 Comments
Comment posted by David Schoen on June 20, 2016 at 7:38 PM
Regardless of which way you go Jim, it is a nice image.  I agree about the use of Nik Software Color Effects 4 using the pro contrast filter first to see where that would take you.
Registered on November 6, 2006, 1213 Posts, 4587 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Thompson on June 20, 2016 at 8:04 PM
Hi Jim, I like this image a lot. I agree that the repost really improved the plumage of the bird and that the bg brightness could be toned down a touch if you felt like it. The open beak and one legged pose are very cool. Nice work!
Registered on August 7, 2014, 125 Posts, 2319 Comments
Comment posted by S Govindarajan on June 20, 2016 at 11:57 PM
Jim:

The repost is much better. I see your point about the difference between what you saw and what you posted. But I think the details in your repost are much better and that is a good reason to brighten the scene. While our eyes can spot details even in a darker scene, some of it is lost when it comes through the camera which has a lower dynamic range and needs some post-processing to retrieve it. Also second others' suggestion on darkening the background. A fine image, nonetheless.
Registered on April 19, 2008, 115 Posts, 1921 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on June 23, 2016 at 4:14 PM
I don't mind the background color in the repost.  You could have achieved both a lighter bird and a darker background by using some fill flash in the field.  devil
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments