Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Treeleidoscope +RP
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Treeleidoscope +RP

by Brad Strong

Gallery: LandscapePosted March 11, 201651 views4 comments
I took this in 2007 during a trip to Yosemite Valley (You could already tell that by looking, right?). This is in the Merced River right in the valley. I was on the photo-walk guided tour. The guide was showing Ansel Adams prints at the time I took this. I don't think she was all that amused. 

This is another revisited/reedited image. B&W was the only real choice for this one. 

Canon Rebel XTi, 200mm 2.8L @ f/2.8, 1/200 Sec, ISO 400, Hand-held, LR CC.

All comments welcome. I'm thinking of burning to the left of the tree some more but am not sure. I kind of like the detail there though.

Comments

4 comments
Comment posted by Dave Dillemuth on March 11, 2016 at 8:40 PM
Pleasing B&W image, evoking a sense of serenity. The trunk reflection works well and adds visual interest. 

I see the primary interest as the left and center of the image. I don't see the the right side adds much. As such, I think I would play with cropping a bit from the right side to tighten up the comp.
Registered on December 10, 2015, 104 Posts, 1112 Comments
Comment posted by Roel Wijtmans on March 12, 2016 at 10:09 AM
A guide that doesn't like it when people get carried away by the very area that they are guiding people through aren't made for the job I think. Sounds equally silly to me as a baker who doesn't appreciate it when people enjoy his/her pie or cake.

I appreciate your choice of going for b+w, that puts a bit of "mystery" in this comp, and makes me wonder about the photo a lot. I do think the 50/50 comp is also responsible for that feeling.
The tree is eye catching enough to work like this, so burning the part to the left is not necessary for me. I could actually see a slight dodging on the right side as a positive thing I think. The reflection works very well too!
Registered on September 30, 2012, 116 Posts, 2257 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on March 12, 2016 at 1:22 PM
Brad,

Never in a million years would I have guessed Yosemite.  I can't even figure out what kind of tree that is, and it's not like there's a huge variety of trees.  I suppose a fir, cedar or something that is OLD and weathered and where through erosion and flooding, the tops of the roots have been exposed.  This looks my like a cypress swamp to me.

Anyway... a terrific image and a great choice to go b&w.  Despite the chaotic nature of surrounding shore, the tree focuses the scene nicely.

I too would consider dodging a bit on the right, or even a slight crop from the right.  I think the interested beside the tree and reflection is more on the left than on the right.  Also, minor thing, this appears to be slightly rotated ccw if viewing just the water line on the tree.

Kudos for coming away with this from Yosemite.  Who would have known...


Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Strong on March 13, 2016 at 8:52 AM
Here's a repost with some dodging on the right side, or should I say unburned. The water line isn't straight since I shot upriver a bit. I've tried straightening it, but it doesn't look good since the reflection isn't vertical anymore. 
Registered on October 1, 2012, 43 Posts, 302 Comments