Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Female House Finch +repost
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Female House Finch +repost

by Jim Hansen

Gallery: AvianPosted June 14, 201573 views10 comments

The females have their own sort of beauty.  D800e, 300f4, 1.4tc, f7.1, 1/125, ISO 400, tripod.  Comments and criticism are highly valued.  Thanks for looking.

Comments

10 comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on June 14, 2015 at 7:30 AM

Very nice, Jim. I like the pose and gorgeous bg. devil

Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on June 14, 2015 at 10:28 AM

Ordinary bird. Extraodinary image. Well done.

Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on June 14, 2015 at 11:36 AM

Nice, Jim.  Great composition and a killer bg with a perfect pose for the composition.  A beautiful image.

devil

Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by John Neukirch on June 14, 2015 at 7:06 PM

An awesome image! My only question was how severe was the crop? Just wondering.

Registered on July 9, 2012, 207 Posts, 1476 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Thompson on June 14, 2015 at 8:48 PM

I love this Jim, that's a perfect pose with really sharp detail. The background is flawless. Great work! devil

Registered on August 7, 2014, 125 Posts, 2319 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on June 14, 2015 at 9:10 PM

Lovely detail, pose and perch. A little tight for my taste.cool

Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on June 14, 2015 at 10:18 PM

Nicely composed, and great techs. The etail in the pretty little lady is quite good. I  agre with Phil that it is just a tad tight for my taste, but that's a minor nit. Very nice.

Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hansen on June 15, 2015 at 12:51 AM

Thanks for the comments.  Phil and Jim, I considered this might be a bit tight, but after weighing this one and a bit less tight, I felt this was better.  John, I am not sure how to measure the severity of the crop, but when blown up to the size I posted, Photoshop said it was 66.7%.  I have included the original image, raw converted to jpeg.  It's a fairly severe crop in my opinion.  This is the reason I got this camera (barely used, $900 less than new), because of the incredible resolution and cropping ability.  I will never be able to afford a 500 or 600mm lens, so this will suffice, for a lot less money.  

Registered on May 5, 2011, 161 Posts, 908 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy VanSwearingen on June 15, 2015 at 6:49 PM

Love the BG with the same colors on her middle back feathersblush

Registered on May 23, 2009, 800 Posts, 2042 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on June 15, 2015 at 10:15 PM

Really nice detail and comp on this one Jim. Good work!

Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments