I've used this title many times but... ya know.
I shot this in late 2010, when my photography training wheels were just coming off. It was this particular night where I felt inspiration like none I had ever felt before, as I saw the massive eddy take shape after experimenting with long exposures. More on the
blog on all that.
This image is a two exposure high dynamic range (HDR) shot; one image for the landscape at f/11, 2 min and one for the sky at f/4 and 4 min 20 sec. This allowed me to capture quality light in both the landscape and sky with optimal depth. While I didn’t plan for this final image to be the result of these two exposures, I am glad that I was able to make it work!
Still not sure if I love the balance of colors in this image. While the fall foliage on the right is compelling, I am not sure that the reds/oranges work well with the more yellowish sky and the teal water. I may try a B&W rendition to see how that works. In the meantime, your thoughts are certainly appreciated!
Comments
21 commentsaF
My only suggestion is the slight halo looking horizon line. Looks a little desaturated and haloish. I'd consider trying to do some advanced subtle color and tone work there to make that stand out less.
Unusual terrific sky color and the dark and foreboding land.
Very nice work.....
To achieve a bit more color cohesion I warmed up the foreground per Lucy's comment. Also applied a very slight amount of burning and fixed the tilt. I did try to reattack the seeming halo on the right ridges, may try a little more later... but in general, the light pollution was coming in from near the horizon which makes this difficult. Before I proceed to a B&W version, may I ask which of these two you prefer?
REPOST
So, if you only give me the choice of the two, I'd have to say the first one. But, they seem only different in hue, not in contrast or highlighting.
Albert Darmo
Canada
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI