Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Rocky King
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Rocky King

by Richard Sandor

Gallery: WildlifePosted November 6, 2014166 views7 comments
Here's a full body portrait of a bighorn ram taken about 45 minutes west of downtown Denver along I-70. Initially, the ram was mixed in among several ewes. When it decided to lie down on this rocky perch, I took this photo. Processed in LR and CC2014 mainly to tone down some of the brighter background rocks.
Taken with a D4s and 500 mm lens on tripod at 1/160 (tripod VR on), f/8 ISO 1000 and -1/3ev. C&C welcome. Richard

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Allen Brooks on November 6, 2014 at 11:21 AM
Really nice pose and lighting. Looks tack sharp to me. I like the rocky background, but for some reason my eye is drawn a bit to the brambles in the upper left corner. Maybe clone in rocks for a more uniform background. A small nit on a really nice shot. I also like the small rock in front of the ram as they both have similar colors.
Registered on July 27, 2011, 262 Posts, 2597 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Watkins on November 7, 2014 at 1:10 AM
Richard,
This is great!
The pose is perfect and the detail amazing :toast: :toast:
Registered on December 15, 2010, 1537 Posts, 4877 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on November 7, 2014 at 9:50 AM
Hey Richard,

NOTE to others (so I don't look like a negative goon!): Richard has requested that I give him "full-bore" critiques and hold nothing back in terms of what I think - or would do differently - with his shots (all in the spirit of learning, of course!)...

Great pose here - ya gotta love it when this happens. The habitat definitely gives the shot a sense of place for the subject as well. I think there are two things here that detract from the shot for me. First is the relative amount of space above and below the subject - for my taste there's a little too much foreground (I think it's only rarely that "grounding" subjects low in the frame doesn't work) and not quite enough space above. Sometimes placing the subject high in the frame can give a sense of it being perched up high (in the case of a bighorn that can be a benefit giving what they "do"), but with the subject this large in the frame it's obvious it wasn't way up on a cliff (so what I'm saying is that a high placement in the frame can be good in a bighorn "animalscape", but here it doesn't help create an illusion of height). And it feels just a TAD cramped on top.

Second thing that stands out for me is the DoF - there's too much of it. In other words, the subject isn't separated from the background as well as it could be. Trying to make a subject blend in to the background CAN be a good strategy, but almost never when you're trying to do an effective full frame shot. In this case I think opening up by a good stop would have been advisable (and the more I look at this I'm thinking this must be a fairly large crop as even at f8 a "frame-filler" will traditionally have less DoF than this (if it is a true frame-filler).

Just my 2 cents worth - hopefully some food for thought...

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sandor on November 7, 2014 at 12:34 PM
Allen, Ken and Brad: thanks for the useful suggestions. I've applied them to a re-do. My rationale for using f/8 was that I was close to the ram (10meters) and wanted its entire body in focus. Backing up wasn't an option as the next step back would have put me in a ditch. So this is nearly a full frame. I've cropped a bit off the bottom and sides, leaving the top intact whereas originally, I did the opposite. I've also tried to decrease the sharpness of the b/g by applying gaussian blur selectively. The takeaway lesson though is to spin the aperture dial.

If it's OK with the mods, I'll add a second comment with a tighter crop as another alternative. Richard
Registered on January 12, 2014, 453 Posts, 1625 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Sandor on November 7, 2014 at 12:35 PM
Here is V2 with a tight crop. Richard
Registered on January 12, 2014, 453 Posts, 1625 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on November 7, 2014 at 9:36 PM
You caught a fine pose and the details in the Ram are terrific. Your first repost is a noticeable improvement mostly because of the extra contrast (and maybe the blur, but it's nicely subtle).
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on November 11, 2014 at 9:31 PM
Hi Richard,

Sorry for the delay in getting back on this one - didn't know there was a re-post (it's common practice to modify the title with a notice - so this would become "Rocky King - repost" - to alert slackards like me that I should take another look).

OK - repost 1 - with the new crop and Gaussian Blur: The new crop definitely suits my taste better - I like that. To be honest, I'm having trouble noticing the blur (but that might because I'm on a Retina display right now, where everything looks sharp). So for me there's no significant improvement in the isolation of the subject from the background. I personally have never found lens or Gaussian blurs anywhere close to as visually appealing to what you can achieve with a lens with good bokeh (so I agree with your comment that the take home lesson is to spin the aperture dial!).

And repost 2: This crop doesn't work as well for me as the new crop on repost 1. At the bare minimum it needs more room on the left (for me), but still don't think cutting off the body like that would ever feel quite right for me (for me that prone pose doesn't lend itself to a "body chop" crop...).

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments