Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Repost - Mt R & Milky W II
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Repost - Mt R & Milky W II

by Ken Smith

Gallery: LandscapePosted September 22, 20141,312 views8 comments
Taken Saturday night (9-20-2014) from Sunrise at a road turnout near the top. I think …oh…one or two dozen photogs were bumping around that night. Pitch black, moonless until a small sliver arose around 3:45AM.. A crystal clear night …not too cool...one could hear the chattering and see photog headlamps bobbing around. Vehicles with their lights were coming and going into the wee hours.

Blend of a 10 minute shutter at 640 ISO and F4.5 at 24mm with the 14-24 Nikon lens on Nokon D800e. Then a 30 sec 3200 ISO and F2.8 for the sky. I just cloned the sky atop the blurred sky at 100% opacity to get this. Then I had some color noise to clean up.

I enjoyed the evening, stayed warm and took a few sunrise shots from below this spot showing the Glacier Basin Valley … nothing special….those can be seen on the PNW Forum.

Ken

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on September 22, 2014 at 10:52 AM
Gorgeous image for my tastes Ken. The land and sky look natural and harmonious to me. I don't see any noise. I'm wondering what formula if any you used to calculate your exposure for the sky. I think I'm starting to see a touch of star trails. Not enough to bother me and it may just be my imagination. I haven't tried to do a night image yet and your's are inspiring me to try it. Again - beautiful work.

pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Kearl on September 22, 2014 at 5:52 PM
This is a nice blend with a light enough FG to make it interesting and some nice color in the FG.
I might warm it up a tad?......
Registered on September 2, 2013, 209 Posts, 1514 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on September 22, 2014 at 10:01 PM
This looks great, Ken, seems like a reasonable amount of light on the foreground and lots of fine details in the sky. I also like the hint of light on Mt. Rainer. Is that from the moon? In the larger version, some of the stars seem streaked a bit and others not. That has me thinking that the difference is what the atmospherics optics community calls "scintillation", which means that small warm and cold sections of the atmosphere lead to local blurring.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on September 23, 2014 at 2:34 AM
Nice Ken, love that sky. Sounds like it was a fun night...or morning I should say!
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on September 23, 2014 at 3:44 PM
Nice job on this, Ken. I like that there is detail in the foreground, and I love the light on Rainier.

--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Roger Clark on September 23, 2014 at 11:26 PM
Hello Ken,

While a nice composition, for me the sky and stars are too blue. While it is fine if you specifically want this effect, it bears little to reality as the dark moonless night sky is not blue. The Milky Way has beautiful browns and many emission nebulae in this part of the sky are red and magenta. Most stars are yellow to red in color and we can see those colors in the brighter ones. If well dark adapted with no lights, the Milky Way can look brownish to our eyes (with "normal" vision). There are some blueish white (the hottest) stars, but no actual blue stars. The background night sky is strongly colored from airglow (the same colors as in aurora), and the green airglow is trying to show in your image toward the horizon. For more on the colors of the night sky, please see my article on this subject:
http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/color.of.the.night.sky/
and the next article in the series shows how to process night sky images to maintain those colors if you wish.

Is the light on Mount Rainier that from the light pollution from Puget Sound cities?

Very well done merge of sky and land, especially well done with the trees.

Roger

Registered on May 8, 2014, 2 Posts, 23 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on September 25, 2014 at 6:28 PM
Really cool shot! :toast: My only suggestion would be to reduce the Cyan in it. Feels a little over powering to me.
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Smith on September 26, 2014 at 3:30 PM
Thanks for the comments! After revisiting this so often….the saturation began to drag down my enjoyment. I pulled out a lot of the cyan (Thanks Mark) and blues… And got some ‘clear’ thoughts from Roger also. I am thinking this next version has better ‘staying-power’. Ken S
Registered on September 5, 2008, 449 Posts, 2444 Comments