Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Vermillion Mirror (+)
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Vermillion Mirror (+)

by Jared Warren

Gallery: LandscapePosted September 3, 2014668 views23 comments
From the ever-fascinating White Pocket of the Vermillion Cliffs wilderness area. Looking forward to your candid reactions and suggestions for refinements. The terrain exposure was made a half-hour or so after sunset (and darkened down in post). I left my camera and tripod at the spot, went back to the car for a late dinner and some reading, and came back a couple hours later for the star exposure. I only got a few exposures before a cloud bank came in and obscured the stars.

A few of my own thoughts at the moment: the noise in the reflection bothers me, but I'm not sure how much of an issue it is. Acceptable as is or apply more noise reduction? [Now that I see the larger image posted here the sky noise doesn't look great either; ISO 6400, 25 sec, f/2.8]. I considered a darker terrain, but wanted to show off the interesting formations, so left it lighter than usual. I was happy to find the faint shooting stars after I pulled up the images for processing; I hadn't noticed them in the LCD screen images in the field.

Anyway, looking forward to your thoughts and suggestions.

Comments

23 comments
Comment posted by Pat Sampson on September 3, 2014 at 7:20 PM
Jared,

I don't see any noise that bothers me in the reflection. This is a spectacular image. I admire it very much. No suggestions on my part. Wish I'd made it on over to the Vermillion cliffs while I was at the GC.

pat
Registered on May 19, 2007, 953 Posts, 15989 Comments
Comment posted by Thomas Haney on September 3, 2014 at 7:48 PM
Fascinating shot Jared. The noise doesn't bother me, and though I'm sure you could improve on your technique with these, I think you're doing great. I do wish the reflection was a bit brighter, but the noise would probably become too obvious..
Registered on April 7, 2013, 138 Posts, 537 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Kearl on September 3, 2014 at 8:05 PM
What NR do you use?
Topaz works well for star photo's for me, you can apply it as much or little as possible and it retains sharpness better than other NR software.
I like the photo a lot but do think it could use more NR.
The reflection would look fine with a lot of NR as you don't expect pinprick stars in a water reflection.
You brought our a lot of detail in the rock, I think it looks excellent.
Registered on September 2, 2013, 209 Posts, 1514 Comments
Comment posted by Navin Sarma on September 3, 2014 at 9:47 PM
Jared -- this is FANTASTIC. An amazing astro shot from this location. I might suggest a darkening of darks, especially in the pool. A silhouette down there would do nicely IMO.
Registered on July 17, 2011, 233 Posts, 1373 Comments
Comment posted by gary phillips on September 3, 2014 at 10:16 PM
Hi Jared,
Wow another sweet night shot from White Pocket. I like most everything about this and can only suggest a couple of things. I have zero aptitude for star photography so take what I say with a grain of salt. I agree with Navin, that the pool and reflection could be much darker which would help some with the noise. The reflection itself looks too bright to me anyway, which gives it an odd appearance for this time of night. There is a slight halo along the right side of the formation where it is backed by the brightest portion of the Milky Way. Not a big deal, but noticeable in the large. Love the sky and the meteors are way cool. I really enjoy these night shots of yours and I dare not show them to my wife. :wink:
Registered on October 24, 2013, 185 Posts, 4136 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Reid on September 3, 2014 at 10:34 PM
Wow, you've been killing it lately Jared and this is another beauty. Great detail in the rocks and wonderful sky. Great comp also. Bit of noise in the bottom but not to bad unless you print it big. Was reading somewhere to take it back into Camera Raw as a filter and use the mask slider to mask the NR out of the stars. Then brush it in in PS. But others here will know far me than I do so I imagine they will chime in. But great image. :toast:
Registered on January 27, 2013, 65 Posts, 2460 Comments
Comment posted by Roger Clark on September 3, 2014 at 10:49 PM
Hi Jared.

This is really nicely done. You have a lot of nice browns in the Milky Way and even more in the reflection of the Milky Way. There is a hint of green airglow and near the horizon some red airglow. The reflection is well done. The streaks appear to be satellites, not meteors. A meteor streak usually stars dim, brightens and then dims again, with changes in color along the path. Your streaks are quite constant, both in brightness and color, and the start and stop abruptly like a satellite slowly rotating. Also, 4 meteors in a 25 second exposure, from different originating directions is extremely low probability as there are only a handfull of such meteors per hour over the whole sky.

Some nits:
There is a strange dark rim on the mountain peaks in the reflection. Is that due to some masking? Those dark rims do not show on the real subject.
The reflection does not have the same contrast as the subject. The reflection is much lower contrast and lacks the shadows/shading of the direct view of the rocks/mountain.
You've lost a lot of star color. For example, Antares barely shows any of its orange so easily visible with unaided eyes. ISO 6400 didn't help here. Did you reduce exposure in the raw converter to try and help star colors, then boost in post? See my article on processing to help that:
http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/night.photography.image.processing/

It seems that the star reflections do not line up with the stars in the sky in the middle of the image. But maybe I'm not seeing the correct stars. Was the sky and reflection done at the same time?

Perhaps doing the land in twilight and the sky later made the reflection with different shading. Try doing a long exposure on the land near the time of the sky (even in addition to the twilight image) Maybe blending those two together may make a more natural transition. But this really is a small nit, as most people may not notice this. The stars in the reflection are obviously fainter than the sky, but the mountain is brighter in the reflection. So darkening the land reflection and increasing the contrast would help bring things into balance.

A warmer color balance would restore the rich browns of the Milky Way. See the recent image here by John Neukirch.

Even with my nits, still a beutiful and striking image.

Roger
Registered on May 8, 2014, 2 Posts, 23 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Smith on September 4, 2014 at 12:10 AM
Put 10 photographers in a room and ask them to agree on how a photo could be improved …. like herding cats….

So here is another op-ed…worth whatever you think: The reflection is awesome…always water reflections are a great add’n. The only nit is the upland shoreline is dark and gets lost near the waterline. The reflection is brighter than the rock above it which makes one work this over to ‘unpack’ what is shown. Perhaps brightening the band of red/dark rock just above the water and darkening the reflection just a hair where it is brightest and closest to the water will help….concentrate the effort near the shoreline and center area where the waves are nearly as bright in the reflection as the upland. Then try darkening the sky in the reflection, just a tad to help get separation of sky from the mtn reflection…and to reduce noise.

This is a winner…well done…. metallic print, perhaps.
Registered on September 5, 2008, 449 Posts, 2444 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on September 4, 2014 at 12:24 AM
Agreed, this is striking. Very enjoyable Jared! :toast:
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Feinberg on September 4, 2014 at 6:03 AM
At web size this is great. For print it might be limited by the noise. No way to tell though until you do :) Nice capture.

aF
Registered on October 26, 2009, 399 Posts, 2789 Comments
Comment posted by Bob Miller on September 4, 2014 at 10:55 AM
I like the comp and the contrast right at the peak. The reflection is a bonus. Nice work!
Registered on January 24, 2005, 152 Posts, 405 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on September 4, 2014 at 10:55 AM
I agree with the others Jared, it is a spectacular image. Love the shooting stars. I myself would try and reduce the noise if I could, both in water and sky. Not a deal breaker by any means.

I don't think we're there technology wise to create noise free milky way images yet. I haven't seen one yet I don't think. As cameras continue to improve their performance at higher ISO's we'll get there eventually. Again, stellar image in any case!
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by Jared Warren on September 4, 2014 at 3:45 PM
Thanks, all, for your helpful comments and feedback so far. I've learned so much from the good "critical eyes" on this forum. This repost tries to address many of your comments (although next time I'd like you to please try to avoid giving me conflicting recommendations :wink: ). I'll probably continue to experiment with refinements and maybe try some test prints with different levels of NR applied, but for this version I did the following: 1) used a TK "super darks" mask just on the reflection (sky and terrain) to darken and increase contrast, 2) applied more NR (Lightroom) to sky and sky reflection, 3) tried to fix some haloing and the issue Roger noted with some edges of the bottom terrain reflection (that was due to an imprecise quick selection when blending), 4) minor dodging/burning/cleanup.

Viewed here on the white background it's probably hard to tell a difference in this repost, but thanks for the good feedback!
Registered on May 11, 2012, 84 Posts, 931 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Cameron on September 4, 2014 at 7:58 PM
Hi Jared

You know I'm not as a rule a huge fan of these night shots they can get a bit overwhelming but I have to say this one is one of the strongest I have seen on here. A really really good effort with an exceptionally fine balance that feels like a window on the night.
Registered on August 6, 2004, 1125 Posts, 3318 Comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on September 5, 2014 at 8:52 AM
Wonderful
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on September 5, 2014 at 9:35 AM
This is extraordinary, Jared! The mood here is fabulous and I think you have just enough light on the landscape to make it believable while still portraying a night time scene. If you can address the noise issue in the reflection it will elevate an already fantastic image another notch. Great work here.

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by Gary McGhee on September 5, 2014 at 9:49 AM
This looks superb Jared.

Gary.
Registered on April 15, 2010, 142 Posts, 2416 Comments
Comment posted by Soubhik Patranabis on September 5, 2014 at 10:16 AM
Beautiful - I like the repost more .. :toast:
Registered on January 25, 2010, 54 Posts, 610 Comments
Comment posted by Doug Koepsel on September 5, 2014 at 11:51 AM
Repost looks like the better version to me, even at the small size. Nice take-away from WP.
Registered on April 1, 2010, 196 Posts, 1592 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on September 5, 2014 at 8:18 PM
Lovely image, Jared. The repost looks great to me. Well done!

--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on September 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM
Nice job on this man! :toast:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Campisi on September 12, 2014 at 2:29 AM
Repost is a definite improvement!
Registered on November 24, 2008, 304 Posts, 3211 Comments
Comment posted by S Govindarajan on September 21, 2014 at 11:12 PM
Stunning image, Jared. The noise is noticeable in the reflection, but doesn't detract anything from the image. Very well thought out and executed. :toast: :toast:
Registered on April 19, 2008, 115 Posts, 1921 Comments