Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Black Chinned Hummer
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Black Chinned Hummer

by Keith Bauer

Gallery: AvianPosted July 5, 2014387 views22 comments
I have finally had a bit of time to get out in the back yard and photograph the hummers this summer.

This is one from this morning. Female Black Chinned Hummer.

Techs:

Canon 5D Mark III
100-400 @ 400mm
1/125 @ f/16, ISO 320

Four Canon 430EX II Flashes, 3 on the hummer, and one for the background.

Larger version really helps see the details.

Thx for taking a look

Comments

22 comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on July 5, 2014 at 3:47 PM
Beautiful one, Keith. No thoughts for improvement in anyway...... :cool:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by John Neukirch on July 5, 2014 at 4:01 PM
Absolutely mesmerizing Keith! Did you think about getting rid of the ghosted tail feathers? Either way it looks exceptional. :toast:
Registered on July 9, 2012, 207 Posts, 1476 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on July 5, 2014 at 4:33 PM
Beautiful as always Keith and the larger version is a must see,
I was wondering how you got such detail in the wings at 1/125 SS ?
Thanks,
Mike
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Berry on July 5, 2014 at 5:40 PM
Stunning is the word that comes to mind. Kudos!!!!
Registered on June 20, 2014, 17 Posts, 71 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on July 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM
I was wondering how you got such detail in the wings at 1/125 SS ?


Mike. The camera settings for this image are amost meaningless except that they are setup to create a black frame. The exposure is all from the multi-flash settings. The flashes are set in manual at either 1/16 or 1/32. That produces a flash duration of around 1/10000. That is really the effective shutter speed, hence the ability to stop the hummingbird wings.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Sharon Hallowell on July 5, 2014 at 6:19 PM
Wonderful comp; stunning bg, bird and flower. I don't understand all that flash stuff, but whatever...you nailed it! Sharon
Registered on November 1, 2003, 392 Posts, 4810 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on July 5, 2014 at 7:03 PM
Thanks Keith for the insightful answer to my question, it helps me more than you can imagine. I am also assuming that the SS being controlled by the flashes as you said, would also be the case when using a single flash?
Thanks,
Mike
P.S. Having this conversation with you is not only educational but, I get to look at this sweet image again, Win - Winn !
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Williams on July 5, 2014 at 10:18 PM
Extraordinarily sharp in all the right places Keith. Lighting is amazing. Thanks for sharing your specs.
Registered on December 28, 2010, 636 Posts, 3499 Comments
Comment posted by Todd Bauer on July 5, 2014 at 10:38 PM
Please elaborate. Did ambient light cause the slight double exposure on the left side of the tail, and perhaps the left wing, which was then cloned? I don't know much about cloning. (The background at about 1/3 proximal left wing appears to have an angular "smudge"). Or is it the slight lag time between the flashes firing? It's nearly flawless, and certainly beautiful.
Registered on May 28, 2014, 50 Posts, 176 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on July 5, 2014 at 10:42 PM
I am also assuming that the SS being controlled by the flashes as you said, would also be the case when using a single flash?


When using flash, whether multi, or single, the exposure is really made up of two parts. The two parts are the ambient light, and the light provided by the flash(es). If the flash(es) provides all the light it is typically called "flash as main light". If the light is largely ambient with just a bit of flash it is typically called "fill flash". There is clearly a gradual scale between fill flash and flash as main light. If the shutter speed is fast enough that the resulting ambient exposure would be black (or greatly underexposed), then the flash duration becomes the effective shutter speed. If the shutter speed is slow, then the flash pulse can become a small fraction of the overall exposure time. For example, shooting some moving subject with a 1 second exposure with a flash, the flash is a very small component of the overall exposure time. The effective shutter speed in this case is the shutter speed the camera set.

Hope that helps answer your question. Flash is a magnificent tool to master in the field to solve a huge array of problems.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on July 5, 2014 at 10:48 PM
Please elaborate. Did ambient light cause the slight double exposure on the left side of the tail, and perhaps the left wing, which was then cloned?


That is caused by the ambient light adding enough light to cause "ghosting" from the movement of the tail. I should have had slightly better settings so that the ambient light added absolutely nothing to the overall exposure to avoid the ghosting. There was no cloning done. A small crop, pretty much out of the camera.

Here is a link to the image that I posted on my personal website. This version has the ghosting cloned from around the tail.

Hummingbird with Ghosting Removed
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Todd Bauer on July 5, 2014 at 10:52 PM
Thanks, teach. Really good lesson.
Registered on May 28, 2014, 50 Posts, 176 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on July 5, 2014 at 11:34 PM
Nice, Keith. Excellent detail and flash work.

:toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Jefferson Silva on July 6, 2014 at 2:06 AM
Perfect, Keith!
Beautiful composition, great wings position.
Registered on December 18, 2012, 162 Posts, 975 Comments
Comment posted by Hans Overduin on July 6, 2014 at 6:50 AM
Almost studio-art (meaning this in a positive way). Excellent work Keith, but then again I don't expect anything less from you :wink:. Normally these colors would be too much for me, but here it works very well ! Cheers, Hans
Registered on August 31, 2011, 491 Posts, 3807 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on July 6, 2014 at 3:59 PM
Beautiful shot Keith. You really have a great flash set-up for these and love the choice of BG as it really adds to the red in the flowers. Curious...Did you use a gel filter over the BG flash to create the gradient pinkish-red tones, or was that just from the positioning of the BG flash? Nice work!
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on July 6, 2014 at 4:26 PM
Curious...Did you use a gel filter over the BG flash to create the gradient pinkish-red tones, or was that just from the positioning of the BG flash?


Hi Kurt: I did not use any gels on the flashes. The background gradient is largely from then position / angle of the background flash.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by David Bogener on July 6, 2014 at 6:53 PM
Beautiful Keith. The hummer pose is interesting and the background is killer. Dave
Registered on October 30, 2013, 417 Posts, 1255 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on July 7, 2014 at 8:17 PM
I was at Tandayapa Lodge when Glenn Bartley was doing one of his classes on hummingbird photography. It was almost like portraiture, with an outdoor studio. Glenn used mounted flowers with sugar water injected into them, artificial backgrounds, multi-flashes and remote shutters. While the photos were very good, the process was kind of off-putting. Even the hummingbirds were food-conditioned.

Reading the various comments here, it sounds like your approach is much less artificial. And there's no question the photo (other than the ghosting) is superb. But at what point do photos like Glenn's cross NPN rules?
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by David Salem on July 8, 2014 at 9:01 AM
fantastic frame!! Congrats
Registered on June 25, 2014, 6 Posts, 67 Comments
Comment posted by Jason Jablonski on July 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM
Amazing photo!! I would love to be able to produce a shot like this with the use of flash! Love the contrasts in the photo!
Registered on March 1, 2014, 24 Posts, 43 Comments
Comment posted by Ester van Dam on July 10, 2014 at 9:11 AM
absolutely exquisite, so sharp, beautiful colors and composition just wow!
Registered on August 30, 2011, 50 Posts, 103 Comments