Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Peaks of the Lights
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Peaks of the Lights

by Marc Adamus

Gallery: LandscapePosted October 2, 20131,980 views31 comments
At least a few of you out there who follow my work knew that throughout last year and early this year I had been planning an expedition to cross Baffin Island on foot, in Canada's Far North. However, later this year, areas I had yet to see images of in Arctic Norway caught my eye on maps I was looking over and pretty soon, plans changed. I went into planning an October trip this year to Norway's furthest northern reaches, doing dozens of hours of map research on routes to what I suspected to be photogenic locations. But then, 3 days before I was about to leave, I realized I could not go this year.

I miss spending time with family, for one, having to myself as it is only about 1 month home out of every year. Despite our many trips elsewhere, I felt bad being away for three and a half months strait again this fall and needed a few weeks down-time before my next major travels. The other reason though, is that Alaska and it's Boundary Range has been calling me back with a great urgency I can not ignore. After spending the late summer trekking and doing some aerial photography and scouting of the range I spent 35 days solo packing across last year, I have decided that instead I will depart after my time with family for a 3-week solo trip in early winter, skiing or snowshoeing some of the gnarliest parts of this largely unphotographed range.

So as normal, as every day of my life, my plans change on a whim. I often have to remind myself where I have woken up in the morning. Any of you who have done a tour with me know that often, there is no itinerary! It's all a reaction, in nature photography, not a set plan. At least for me, that's how I maintain the strongest connnection to and interpretations of the places I visit. I am always trying to keep both eyes open to everything around me, and listen to my gut and my heart. In fact, I think freedom is defined by being able to live one's life that way, and if I can, I do.

So why mention all this? Well, I didn't think I'd be back on NPN any time soon, but here I am. I actually have tons of new work from this summer and fall, but it's not up on my site yet. This is one I took from a heli-in backpacking workshop I lead in Yukon's Arctic.

The Aurora here was captured in a single exposure at 12,500 ISO with absolutely no visible grain and very acceptable star details with my Nikon D800, after some noise reduction in RAW and post. The exposure was 1.5 seconds, which is needed for a rapidly changing and booming show like this. The foreground is a focus-stack of 4 images all at f/2.8, ISO 6400 and 2 minutes each. It ended up being so green because of all the reflected light being the only light source, I had to desaturate it about 60% just to look even a little natural to me! Obviously, I would have preferred a 1 second shot here too, but we don't have ISO 200,000 yet :wink:


See the larger version!

Comments

31 comments
Comment posted by Bob Miller on October 2, 2013 at 10:59 AM
Magical. Love the smoke-like swirls of the aurora. Not sure where you want to lead the viewer though. Seems that the lighter stream and the aurora fight a bit for attention leaving the peak coming in 3rd. By possibly selectively dodging the snow and reflective areas it might even the scene. Very nice.
Registered on January 24, 2005, 152 Posts, 405 Comments
Comment posted by Thomas Haney on October 2, 2013 at 11:04 AM
Gorgeous shot Mark, as usual with your work there's not much I can say in the way of feedback. Very well done.
Registered on April 7, 2013, 138 Posts, 537 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on October 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM
Well, Bob, I figured since the peaks didn't have any snow on them yet this year and I wanted to make a connection to the Aurora, so I would use the strong stream lines in dominant fashion to direct the eye through the landscape and leave the peaks as prominent as possible between the two, which for me, helped overcome any limitations. Brighter wouldn't have worked for me here, as it is a midnight shot and I feel this represented pretty natural light levels. In a dark environment you should be able to see good details throughout the peaks.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Jesse Summers on October 2, 2013 at 11:56 AM
This is among the most beautiful Aurora shots I've seen. Opting for a 1.5 second exposure instead of a 30 second exposure at a higher ISO was an excellent decision, I really enjoy the detail and contrast in the Aurora only possible because of the short exposure. This is also impressively balanced. The Aurora and stream turn this frame into a natural Taijitu.

I have one (very minor) suggestion. This may be completely pedantic, but the stream led my eye to a small clump of purple/blue rocks center left that drew my attention when I opened the larger frame. Perhaps they wouldn't have caught my attention if they were toned to match the rocks below them.

Besides my nitpicking suggestion, this is one of the most engaging compositions I've seen in a long time. Cheers.
Registered on September 24, 2013, 4 Posts, 9 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on October 2, 2013 at 12:02 PM
Hey Jesse, thanks. Figuring the purple/blue you were seeing might have been hidden in a screen brightness issue, I cranked up the exposure on this one in PS to see if I could find it and did in fact find some slight color aberrations hidden in shadows I had not previously seen. Thanks.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Apodaca on October 2, 2013 at 12:40 PM
Really great image... I'm liking the backwards S curve, started by the aurora, and being handed off to the stream to finish. A very strong, quality image! Loved the large version
Registered on November 16, 2011, 67 Posts, 1127 Comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on October 2, 2013 at 12:41 PM
Very well done Marc. I have no comment, except to sigh and wish that your knowledge and your experiences had been available when I was a young man. :frown:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on October 2, 2013 at 1:31 PM
The flow of this image is top notch. The sky is obviously the show, complimented by the curving stream and great mountain peaks. I feel like the water could use an extra punch of contrast though as it feels flat compared to the glorious sky (which I know is the focus of the image).
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Reid on October 2, 2013 at 1:43 PM
Awesome image Marc with wonderful flow and a great composition. A very realistic aurora compared to most I've seen. Brilliant processing and technique also. Superb image.
Registered on January 27, 2013, 65 Posts, 2460 Comments
Comment posted by Kory Lidstrom on October 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM
Love the image, of course. But, even more, I love the honest commentary. I always figured that someday, even the great Marc Adamus would have to bow to familial obligations. You were smart to do so, methinks.

Looking forward to November. ;)

As far as critique, the bottom does look a tad too dark and featureless. Maybe dodge it up a tad?
Registered on November 19, 2008, 49 Posts, 1035 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on October 2, 2013 at 2:41 PM
Surreal and other-worldly. Great trippy image, Marc.
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Grant Collier on October 2, 2013 at 5:19 PM
A very nice image! The curves in the water nicely match the curves in the Aurora.

I might like it better with the greens in the water toned down a bit more. But having shot the Aurora under no moon I know just how green the foreground looks and can see that it's already been toned down quite a bit. So I know it's more realistic as is and I think it could work either way.

A slightly bigger nit for me is that a few parts of the Aurora seem a bit "hot" and are almost taking on a white color. It looks a little unnatural to me compared to the northern lights displays that I've seen. So I think I'd prefer those spots toned down and made a little more green to blend in more with the rest of the Aurora.
Registered on July 29, 2005, 73 Posts, 430 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on October 2, 2013 at 6:42 PM
Stunning. This must have been awesome to witness.
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Harry Lichtman on October 2, 2013 at 7:14 PM
Great sky in this Marc, but without snow covering the ground, it appears to be more featureless, a little muddy and lacks the textures that the snow helps reveal. While most would consider this high on their list of top shots, just doesn't compare in many ways for me to some of your earlier aurora shots. Very cool, non the less :toast:
Registered on September 17, 2010, 304 Posts, 3507 Comments
Comment posted by Jeremy Kessler on October 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM
Beautiful Image Marc. Ever try rendering an aurora shot in b&w just curious as to how it would look. Enjoy your family!

Planning on Baffin next year? That's one place I'd really really like to visit soon.
Registered on September 13, 2007, 36 Posts, 1283 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on October 2, 2013 at 7:40 PM
I agree some snow would have been a nice addition, but all aurora shots should not be shot in that condition alone, otherwise there's no other way to do it. In fact, the best Aurora shot I ever saw (David Clapp's), was shot with no snow anywhere. It's nice to have variety, and me, personally, I think this was the best rendition of the lights I have shot to date.

Grant, I can see your point but also I kinda feel like that would be like making the sun yellow, as those highlights are naturally really hot and I enjoyed the added color and tonal depth that came from letting them drift towards white. In all my previous Aurora renditions you'll notice I kept everything under more strict control but that can also lead to a rather 'muddy' feel with the low contrasts.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on October 2, 2013 at 11:03 PM
I was gonna give you some awesome advice on the trade off between photographic adventure & absence and longterm influential-important & crucial parental relational-impact that really only exists from a kids inception till their 10 years old, but I'll save you the opinion and what I think is wisdom. Once your kid is 10-11 years old, your core influence diminishes quickly IMO. I will say Photography IMO, as a profession can and does so at a cost of finances, relationships and marriages in more cases then I think people realize. I'd bet it's on par with the deteriorating relationships that are created from the police profession. ( I have nearly a dozen friendships with married cops, and it's a good barometer ) I know of several divorced and/or bankrupt photographers. Hey, enough with the Debby Downer....

As for your photo, well... I've never seen an Aurora in person. This looks really fucking cool. Yeah, I see lots of noise reduction, I see dramatic brightening of the lights above, and I see room for opening the darker zones for print; but I see a compelling web presentation that grabs my attention, has me intrigued, and it bewilders in a good way the amazing qualities of nature. The "Aurora" genre of photos as of late is getting very competitive, but you have the talented knack for still creating a compelling image from the core rules of landscape photography "Near", "Middle", "Far".
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Aaron Feinberg on October 3, 2013 at 2:57 AM
Well that doesnt suck. Was wondering when you'd pop up again. Welcome back...briefly...

aF
Registered on October 26, 2009, 399 Posts, 2789 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on October 3, 2013 at 3:19 AM
Awesome display and composition. I can see a hint of red in the aurora and wonder about bringing them out more for some contrast in the colour palette.
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on October 3, 2013 at 9:17 AM
Matt, thanks. There actually wasn't much 'brightening' of the light here. I did blur the water a bit more but only becuuse I oversharpened it for web and then got lazy. Here's a full res crop from some of the darker areas of the sky too, btw, in case anyone is interested. I am VERY impressed with the camera's performance when it comes to sky and water areas at such ISO's.

Also, btw, we have a great family life and it's neat because every time we spend together is extremely special and memorable. I'm spending almost equally as much time photographing this fall as I was planning previously, and being away was not the core reason for switching trips. My preference to do Norway next year because of a better moon cycle for photography and Alaska's mountains again this year because I'm addicted to it just made sense. And now I'll be back for time this month vs later, and it IS definitely hard to go 3 months or more out there at a time without visiting along the way. We often meet up at different locations all over to do cool stuff.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on October 3, 2013 at 10:10 AM
I shoot with the same setup as know, and it amazes me. I've shot several night high school games at ISO 12k & f/2.8 this past month and the results are jaw dropping. Let me know the Norway tour dates ;)
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on October 3, 2013 at 12:10 PM
Out of this world! Mesmerizing light. :toast:
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on October 3, 2013 at 12:29 PM
Pretty cool...I don't care for the 'milk' on the bottom but i love the peaks and curves of the aurora. Mainly im just jealous cause i have yet to see something like this--my only aurora was in downtown Seattle.
Nice article in OP BTW--i actually saw it in the Jackson Hole Library while killing some time waiting for the snow to end :biggrin:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Moore on October 3, 2013 at 7:52 PM
This turned out exceptionally well, Marc. Congrats on another fine addition to your aurora collection.
Registered on January 12, 2010, 84 Posts, 388 Comments
Comment posted by Stuart Williams on October 4, 2013 at 2:36 AM
living 30km from the equator doesn't give one much opportunity to see such displays of light but this is superb.
Registered on December 7, 2007, 247 Posts, 4792 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Smorra on October 4, 2013 at 11:59 PM
Sweet image Marc! I really like the colors and how the foreground water almost looks like an aurora itself.
Registered on November 2, 2009, 161 Posts, 2143 Comments
Comment posted by Matthew Goldsmith on October 5, 2013 at 8:44 AM
Very nice Marc. I'm trying to understand a bit more about what drives peoples particular artistic interpretations of a scene. What made you decide to go so silky on the water in the foreground?
Registered on June 29, 2010, 37 Posts, 286 Comments
Comment posted by Marc Adamus on October 5, 2013 at 10:26 AM
Matthew, in this case, the water exposure choice was made for me. Since the light levels were so low, it was actually impossible to expose it any other way. Even at such a high ISO as 6400 and wide open aperture of 2.8, I STILL had to expose the water for 2 minutes just to see it properly. A shorter shutter speed, which I would have preferred, is not possible in night imaging.
Registered on September 17, 2005, 780 Posts, 8091 Comments
Comment posted by Jack Garrett on October 13, 2013 at 7:09 PM
Beautiful, amazing image Marc. Congrats on your weekly pick!!
Registered on November 7, 2007, 41 Posts, 251 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on October 13, 2013 at 10:25 PM
This is a special, other worldly type image Marc,
Congratulations on the WP . . . :toast:
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on October 24, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Marc,
Congrats on the WP this is a fantastic image. Pretty much sums up what I had envisioned in my mind as a comp I wish to capture some day. As this photo's theme, I am green with envy here ;)

My grandfather was born in Lofoten, Norway... and there are park lands up there donated by my family. I definitely plan to visit there next year or so to finally see my homeland. Let me know if you want to meet up for at least part of the trip.

As for the family, the young years are so precious. For me, photography will always be there. There will always be great blooms, sunsets, AB storms, etc. 20 years from now, there is a good chance that you may look back and wish that you had been home more often. I could be wrong because every situation is different. Since photography is your primary source of income, you may need to spend more time away from home. Your hard drive is probably full enough for at least 5 years or more of processing marketable images. Hell, you could probably throw away your camera equipment right now and live of your portfolio for the rest of your life.

My advice to you is to make your primary focus on the marketing side and be able to stay home more with Galen and the family. You could really blow the pants off peter lik (name intentionally set to lower case)or Art Wolfe if you found the right connections.
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments