Gallery: Macro & Close-upPosted September 5, 2013498 views9 comments
Moss in the woods...
200 ISO
90mm
f/3,5
1/125s
Comments
9 comments
Comment posted by Lucy VanSwearingen on September 5, 2013 at 5:59 PM
Interesting OOF abstract. You might consider cropping some of the right side to better show off the main attraction.
Registered on May 23, 2009, 800 Posts, 2042 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on September 5, 2013 at 8:54 PM
Interesting and creative image, Ingrid.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on September 6, 2013 at 10:53 AM
I like the scattering of sharp moss parts and the colors in the background. I find the almost sharp moss stalks near the left edge distracting and wonder about blurring those digitally. I could also see cropping the darkest 10% on the right.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Ingrid Vekemans on September 7, 2013 at 5:33 AM
Thanks so much for your comments!
I had wondered about the composition (especially the dark bit on the right), but I didn't want to cut into the bokeh at the top. And I didn't want to lose the 2:3 format, which is the format I prefer. However I have now cropped the image, still in 2:3 and thus chopped off a bit of the bokeh - what do you think...better?
Thanks for your valued opinions!
Ingrid.
Registered on August 2, 2010, 138 Posts, 780 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Wolfenden on September 7, 2013 at 7:38 AM
I think I prefer this as you had it originally, Ingrid. I feel the bright lights in the bg need space to look best - they seem to me a touch overpowering in the cropped version. A very creative and moody image - love it !!
Registered on May 18, 2007, 1108 Posts, 7647 Comments
Comment posted by Ingrid Vekemans on September 7, 2013 at 2:03 PM
Thanks Ian, I look forward to receiving more comments re. the composition.
@Mark: sorry, I forgot to reply previously to your question of blurring the moss stalks on the left. I never have the same feeling for a photograph if I start concealing things, be it blurring or cloning...therefore I don't. I'd rather then show you the imperfections (if I didn't manage to avoid them while taking the photo) - but that's just me and I value your opinion a lot, means I'll look more carefully next time again.
Thanks all!
Ingrid.
Registered on August 2, 2010, 138 Posts, 780 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on September 7, 2013 at 7:20 PM
I think the repost works well. For me, it tells the same story in a clearer way. Clearly, once you start getting into the details of comp. and processing, your into the artistic vision.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Lucy VanSwearingen on September 11, 2013 at 8:34 PM
The re-post is just what I was asking for. Good job
Registered on May 23, 2009, 800 Posts, 2042 Comments
Comment posted by Balan Vinod on September 26, 2013 at 7:16 AM
Ingrid ..I like images like this one ...lovely frame and composition.
Balan Vinod
Registered on March 20, 2006, 889 Posts, 2312 Comments
Comments
9 commentsI had wondered about the composition (especially the dark bit on the right), but I didn't want to cut into the bokeh at the top. And I didn't want to lose the 2:3 format, which is the format I prefer. However I have now cropped the image, still in 2:3 and thus chopped off a bit of the bokeh - what do you think...better?
Thanks for your valued opinions!
Ingrid.
@Mark: sorry, I forgot to reply previously to your question of blurring the moss stalks on the left. I never have the same feeling for a photograph if I start concealing things, be it blurring or cloning...therefore I don't. I'd rather then show you the imperfections (if I didn't manage to avoid them while taking the photo)
Thanks all!
Ingrid.
Balan Vinod