Albion Columbine
by Jared Warren
I hope others aren't tiring of the wildflower images; I'm having a lot of fun with these. About 15 images went into this one, blended for dynamic range and depth of field. No interesting sky, the light could have been better, and I missed focus on part of the foreground columbines (more noticeable when viewed larger), but let me know if you have other feedback for improvement. Also, is the saturation ok for your taste? I had to play around with contrast and WB in shaded areas and I didn't want to overdo it. Thanks for looking.
5Diii, Nikon 14-24 @ 14mm, multiple images @ f/8, base images 1/25 sec.
Comments
13 commentsOh, yeah and definitely not tired of the wildflower images or of great new locations from Utah.
The comp here is excellent, which is always the tough part. I say that referring to the fact that in 10 years from now you will go back and te work this image with a mastery of blending skills. Your gonna go back because the comp is good. Bad comp, and the image will fade away.
Even without clouds I think this image will sing with Marc Adamus blending skills. Lol.
The foreground light seems too bright when you compare it to your much darker midground. Thus your transition there should be less. I would keep the mids where it's at but darken the foreground. However bring out the luniosity in the foreground. The sky blend is a tough one. The mountain exposure isn't too important (your interest is the flowers), so keeping that a bit darker than it is won't be noticeable to most. I would lighten the sky a notch and blend it with the mid foreground. Then sharpen well. The slightly darker foreground should transition well with the mids and distant(slightly lighter) sky. These kinds if blends feel better to the eyes. Histograms help.
Just my opinion. I Myself is still trying to get this kind of blending down. It's not easy.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI