Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Bonneville Salt Flats 2
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Bonneville Salt Flats 2

by Rick Turner

Gallery: LandscapePosted June 22, 2013151 views8 comments
After watching the History channel documentary on Death Valley, which I recommend for all, I better understand how these salt flats originate and change.
The ridges are formed by the salt having moisture sucked out of it by the heat from the sun.

This is a bit different processing

from an earlier post in the environmental pj section.

Sony a77
Minolta 20 mm f2.8 prime
Iso 200
f20 @ 1/13 sec
cpl and tripod
camera height 1.5 foot :wavey:

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on June 22, 2013 at 1:00 AM
Nice fg detail Rick. I like your strong near-far comp. The mg is a little muddy perhaps, but overall I like this one.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Tom Hilton on June 22, 2013 at 11:39 AM
Great contrasting color of the salt and sky, and I really like the comp.
Registered on September 19, 2011, 68 Posts, 668 Comments
Comment posted by Ted Gore on June 22, 2013 at 1:52 PM
I think a little breathing room on top and bottom would have helped. To me, it feels like your FG subject is too close to bottom frame, and your BG subject(the sun) is really close to top frame. Color wise, it feels muddy to me overall.
Registered on April 25, 2013, 36 Posts, 149 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 22, 2013 at 3:06 PM
Rick,

I like your different take on the salt patterns from DV. So often we see the repeating patterns (octagon type shapes) as the main feature, but I like that you've picked out something a bit less conventional. The extreme near/far composition works, but I would agree with others that the top is a little tight. And rather than seeing the middle/top portion as muddy, I think it just needs a little more contrast, more deeper blacks. Clone in a tad more sky and I think that could make a pretty good improvement.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on June 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM
:confused:
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on June 22, 2013 at 7:21 PM
Hey Rick,

What's the frown for? This is a night and day transformation! The vignetting up top might be a little strong, but I absolutely like the idea. Everything else here is an improvement. The ice crystals are bright/whiter emphasizing the foreground much better than before. I like the color better in the salt flats, the midground isn't murkey and the contrast is excellent throughout. The mountains are a much cleaner silhouette too.

So, I think it's a great improvement and thanks for taking the time.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by John Mumaw on June 23, 2013 at 7:37 PM
Exactly what Lon said!
Registered on September 9, 2005, 62 Posts, 2289 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on June 24, 2013 at 10:31 AM
Count me in for what Lon said about the repost. Looking good.
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments