MN Wolf (ID-confirmed?)
by Terry Sohl
This weekend I went up to Duluth to look for winter owls. I was up relatively near Sax-Zim Bog north of Duluth yesterday morning at dawn, and saw a big shape moving in the forest next to the gravel road I was on. He moved parallel to the road as I did, so I thought if I'd stop, he might take the opportunity to cross the road in front of me.
Which he did!
I've seen plenty of coyotes around here, and my first thought on seeing this is "that's not a coyote!". But, I want to make sure...is this a wolf? North of Duluth, it would be "in range". Certainly looked a lot larger than the coyotes I see, and it looked a lot "beefier". The ears certainly aren't as big on this guy as on all my coyote photos.
I've never seen a wolf...hoping that's what this is!
Canon 50D, 400 5.6L, ISO 400, 1/200, f6.3.
UPDATE: The Minnesota DNR guy who works the Sax-Zim Bog area responded to an email, and said "Wolf", as did another guide from the area, and my local wildlife guy up the road at South Dakota State.
Comments
21 commentsBrad
Max
A Sweet Shot. The Head has a Definite Coyote feel to it, except the ears are wolf looking. The Bulk , from a Winter Coat probably, Nice Specimen. I think thje Body type is Coyote, not enough Body bulk for Wolf.
When he walks, or moves away , how was the tail being carried ? The Legs & Feet can also assist with determination .
Very Interesting, Thanks for sharing.
Bill
There are definite inter breedings with Wolf & Coyote now,
Crisp Image, especially at 1/200 hand held. Was this a Crop ?
Jeff Lightfoot at 218-999-7938 is the regions wildlife manager.
Don - Good suggestion! I found his email and sent him the link to my website with photos.
I've asked a lot of folks, some saying "definite" wolf, "definite" coyote. It's the ears that throws me off the most on the ID when I compare to all the other coyote photos I have where the ears are all sticking up higher and are bigger. The ears, and the size of the animal. But I'm used to coyotes around here, and from what I've read, coyotes in the eastern forests are bigger.
Was a fun moment...ALMOST enough to make me want to go out more often to train my camera on things WITHOUT feathers.
Coloration is suggestive of wolf, especially in that it lacks facial detail/color patches. Wolf images I looked at showed most adults with a more markedly husky build, especially neck and chest, with a blockier muzzle and often with a noticeable ruff. Your capture has a more delicate nose that looks coyote. But all direct profile coyote images I have share an interesting trait. They ALL have the same "expression" or smile profile in the line created by the closed mouth, which to my eye looks like a smug attitude. Wolf expressions appear more impassive. Your profile shot has a more impassive expression. On-line sites suggest wolves have more rounded ears, coyotes more pointed. Yours looks more rounded than any of my coyote images. But the real kicker to me, is that all my coyote images, even the larger males with more wolf-like characteristics have a narrow space between the upright ears when viewed head on with ear erect pose. I would say this sample is almost twice the width for the between ear space.
So my judgement is this is either a hybrid or a younger wolf.
Good Afternoon Terry,
Thank you for the note and the great photographs. Having worked in the Sax/Zim Area for many years and in seeing a fair number of both coyotes and wolves during my time in the field I am confident in saying that your photograph is of a wolf.
Did you see any northern owls?
Jeff
Jeff Lightfoot
Also, the Large Carnivore Specialist for Minnesota DNR contacted me and said "wolf", and wanted the photos for DNR usage for wolf presentations. So, it seems pretty settled that the people that work in the area think it's a wolf.
Wolf or not, it's one great capture,
Congratulations on the WP . . .
Ken Archer
Sandy