Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
A Critter-o-scape
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

A Critter-o-scape

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted January 21, 20131,590 views26 comments
Great Bear Rainforest Critter-o-scape

I had to think twice when deciding where to post this image. It has 17 eagles in it, 6 gulls, and only one measly bear! So by numbers it should go in the avian gallery. But...I'm going to use biomass and argue that the one measly bear far outweighs those birds and post it here! :wink:

Like many wildlife photographers I often like coming away from a shooting session with some interesting close-up shots of my "prey". But, I'm always on alert for good animalscape shots - those images where you're trying to get "classic" shots of an animal in the landscape in which it resides. A lot of novice wildlife photographers are captivated and even pre-occupied by the thought of getting "full frame shots" of their subjects. For those of this ilk the biggest challenge they think they face is getting close enough to their subject for a "good" shot. But if one sticks with wildlife photography for any length of time a realization slowly starts to sink in - that good animalscape shots are almost always far tougher to pull off than those "full-frame" wildlife shots. In shooting a strong animalscape you face all the challenges that a landscape photographer faces in "building" a visual interesting image, plus you add in the challenge of incorporating mobile subjects that could care a less where they "should be" in the frame (those selfish beasts!).

I've been traveling into the Great Bear Rainforest on the central and northern BC coast twice a year since 2005. It's a magical, pristine place - National Geographic magazine referred to it as "The Wildest Place in North America" in August of 2011. I've obtained thousands of close-up shots of bears (and humpback whales, and eagles, and more) over the years and find now that I'm looking more and more for scenes that convey the full feeling, look, and essence of the Great Bear Rainforest. I shot this moody image of the Great Bear in September of 2012, but just got around to processing it recently (January of 2013). This shot was captured in a hard-to-access portion of a rarely visited inlet - in any given year only a handful of humans would get to this spot. I think anyone who sees this shot and has been in the Great Bear Rainforest would instantly think "yep, that's what the Great Bear is all about".

Animalscape shots can be tough to present online. They can have so much detail in them that much of it is lost in an image of 1200 pixels (long axis) or less. For instance, this shot contains a total of 17 eagles (both adults and immatures), 6 gulls, and one bear. So...for those dying to find all 17 eagles (and I willing to bet no one can find more than 16) or those who simply want to see the detail revealed in a larger version here...well...here's a 2500 pixel version...

Subject: Small Great Bear Rainforest menagerie
Location: Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor 70-200mm VR zoom @ 135mm - hand-held from floating zodiac. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/160s @ f8; ISO 500. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: Very minor - this is over 95% of full-framed image

Additional details about the image (including processing details) available here:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/mammals/bears/.

Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so!

Cheers...

Brad

Comments

26 comments
Comment posted by Charlie VanTassel on January 21, 2013 at 4:41 PM
Of course, there are probably more bugs than anything. Pretty cool, Brad. So how did you get them to all look at the camera? I like the surrounding habitat. It gives one a sense of being there. :toast:
Registered on October 18, 2006, 644 Posts, 4801 Comments
Comment posted by Skip Layman on January 21, 2013 at 4:50 PM
I like the totally "natural" feel of this shot. It really makes me want to be there.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 558 Posts, 1704 Comments
Comment posted by Ross Warner on January 21, 2013 at 5:26 PM
Nice eerie mystical feel.
Registered on June 11, 2006, 20 Posts, 40 Comments
Comment posted by Christine Adams on January 21, 2013 at 5:56 PM
This is right up my alley. Thanks for your commentary.
Registered on January 24, 2006, 119 Posts, 1871 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Pullen on January 21, 2013 at 6:01 PM
True wilderness, I love it, Brad. :toast: :toast: Ron
Registered on December 18, 2005, 74 Posts, 1413 Comments
Comment posted by Clinton Bauder on January 21, 2013 at 6:04 PM
Love it. I think it really nicely captures what it's like to be in that area. Regarding what Charlie said I think that's a good argument against using a D800 - had you done so I'm sure you would have been able to resolve 1000's of mosquitos! :biggrin:

Clinton
Registered on December 8, 2009, 31 Posts, 231 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Gulash on January 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM
The central coast is indeed a remote and beautiful place, still "relatively" unspoiled, although I'm personally very concerned about the effect of declining salmon stocks on all the critters in your photo. I like how the photo shows the congregation of life in that critical intertidal zone. Love that fog hanging in the estuary. Well done Brad.
Registered on January 28, 2005, 879 Posts, 12098 Comments
Comment posted by Holly Morris on January 21, 2013 at 11:01 PM
I'm going to trust that there are as many birds as you say there are...I can't see them. My screen's probably too small... Anyway, love the mood this photo projects. I wouldn't change anything
HollyMorris
Registered on October 9, 2012, 66 Posts, 112 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on January 22, 2013 at 5:58 AM
Simply stunning Brad! The 2400px version is a must see to really appreciate this. Although, I must say that I do not understand you dare to post such large files on the net. A 2400px image is very 'usable' for many purposes (heck even a 1200px one is!) and without any watermark whatsoever could easily be misused.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Joe James on January 22, 2013 at 9:34 PM
I love this one Brad....and I only found 15 eagles so I guess I need to hone my observation skills a bit. Well done as always.
Registered on November 20, 2009, 89 Posts, 808 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on January 22, 2013 at 10:15 PM
Hey all,

Thanks for the feedback...appreciated. A few specific responses:

1. Charlie...you asked: "So how did you get them to all look at the camera?"

Well, can't say much without violating NDA's, but doing a little work with software division of a camera company beginning with "N". Designing an app that allows manipulation of head position. Haven't named the product yet, but working name is "WoodYa Lookee Here". Still some bugs to work thru...if you look closely about half the eagles looking at you have Osprey heads and we have some new mixed species gulls there. But it got the bear head right, and looking in the right direction... :wink:

2. Gary...you said: "...I'm personally very concerned about the effect of declining salmon stocks on all the critters in your photo". Agreed...we are all concerned about that - the salmon are the key. Raincoast Conservation Foundation (www.raincoast.org) is doing the best work of all the environmental groups on the coast in fighting for the salmon. Good group and have a very progressive approach. Don't hesitate to look 'em up.

3. Vincent you said: "I must say that I do not understand you dare to post such large files on the net".

Yes, what you say reflects conventional thinking. But it's been my experience that posting large files has had the following results:

A. Increased web traffic
B. Increased sale of images

Of course image "thefts" are possible, but I have two questions that are relevant to the issue: Is the sort of person or group who would steal an image be a potential customer anyway? And, does their theft of the image actually devalue the image or interfere with another sale of it? In most cases I think the answer to both questions is "no".

I have tracked down many of my illegally used images on the web and almost invariably they are from one of two sources:

• Kids "community" websites, and commonly Wolf "Fantasy" sites (where kids create wolf packs - complete with wolf images sourced on the web and with stories woven around them). Doesn't bother me to help these kids out (and all the images they use still have copyright info and URL on them) and...

• Conservation groups. Sigh....you'd think these good guys would just ask. And when I confront them about it they have always instantly pulled the image down and/or agreed to pay me for the use of it. In some cases I have felt strongly enough about the cause to permit the image use, but it must carry a photo credit complete with URL plus a link to my website.

Anyway...I only post large images (the 2400 pix or larger) if it's needed to effectively convey the essence of the image. Which almost only happens with animalscape type images, which are, in my opinion, often hard to effectively convey at 1200 pix or less.

At the end of the day I suppose it's analogous to musicians posting free recordings on YouTube. 99% of the time the "stolen" images used online still bear my copyright info...so it could be considered a form of exposure/marketing. But then I'm not posting any "famous" images! :wink:

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Runco on January 22, 2013 at 11:04 PM
Very nice, this image has an excellent wilderness feel to it Brad. Plenty sharp, and the extra large version is great.
Registered on September 9, 2008, 77 Posts, 705 Comments
Comment posted by Jenaya Launstein on January 23, 2013 at 12:21 AM
Beautiful animalscape, Brad! I love the trees in the background with the fog interlacing them.
Registered on February 8, 2011, 254 Posts, 1302 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on January 23, 2013 at 1:22 PM
The diagonals of the slope and hanging fog add much to this scene, directing the eye to the confluence of life along the bottom left, with the lone bear anchoring the lower right. I bet this is stunning, printed large. I admire the painterly texture you imply with your processing. In a perfect world, perhaps, there would be a tiny sliver more space on the left so a mat/frame would not clip the edge-most tree. The 2500 version is truly required to appreciate and I found myself wanting to view even more closely.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on January 23, 2013 at 1:35 PM
Hey Lon,

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback - you're the only one to notice the trees touching the lower left edge and I TOTALLY agree with you. Actually, there is a TAD more space there (less than 100 pixels) but it leads into more trees. I suppose I could recrop including that area and do a "clear cut" and remove the trees with the clone tool to create a space, but that goes beyond what I'm comfortable doing to an image. But the bottom line is that I truly wish there was a small gap on the left side separating the trees from the left edge of the frame. Good catch on that.

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on January 24, 2013 at 12:05 AM
Brad, interesting points you raised about posting larger images on the net. All I can add is that I recently had a case whereby one of my images was used without permission as a cover of a safari lodge brochure. This image was obtained by the graphic designer via a screenshot! :mad:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on January 24, 2013 at 3:43 AM
Extra-ordinary photograph of pure wildness.

A Work of Art Brad :eek:

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on January 24, 2013 at 8:52 PM
Way to cool, wonderful to see different species within one image. We lived up in the Pacific NW (Olympia, WA) for a short time and did one Alaska cruise up the Inside Passage. One of the best memories of that was to see all the remote inlet/coves and know that there was still some true wilderness left. This shot brings brings back those pleasant thoughts of seeing the wilderness. Thanks for posting this, the larger image was a pleasure to view (and yes I could only find 16 eagles!).
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on January 25, 2013 at 1:23 AM
Thanks Brad!
I continue to enjoy your in depth comments!
As for the image, it has all been said! :toast:
Jagdeep Rajput
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by John Launstein on January 25, 2013 at 4:06 AM
Brad, I had to add my vote and voice of appreciation on this stunning image that has so much "right" in it. Of course the techs are outstanding, but this one has a wonderful wild soul to it. So natural and pristine. And I'm afraid I got stuck at 16 eagles as well. ;)

Really special.
Registered on April 5, 2011, 223 Posts, 1193 Comments
Comment posted by Marlise Launstein on January 26, 2013 at 3:41 PM
Wow a bear beautiful landscape and eagles! You've got three images in one! Very nice colors, and nice pose from the bear.
Registered on August 31, 2011, 28 Posts, 175 Comments
Comment posted by Genny K. on January 26, 2013 at 5:14 PM
I really like this. It's all-encompassing, showing the animals and the environment they live in.
...I can't even find 16 eagles.....I think I only got to 14. Might be tough to see some of those immature ones.
Registered on June 5, 2006, 132 Posts, 2001 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on January 28, 2013 at 4:57 AM
You know I love me some animalscapes, Brad, and this one is schu-weeeet... :toast:
Love being able to view the larger one...

I do think you can perhaps extract a tad more shadow detail, especially in the foreground blacks and the bear?
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on January 30, 2013 at 8:48 PM
Amazing capture here, Brad. Congratulations on this very fine image as well as the WP in this category too. :toast:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Smith on January 31, 2013 at 12:20 AM
Smile! This makes me ...Smile!

Thanks for sharing that 2500 pix version. Wowwee! The detail and superb colors and light ...glad to see my 27'' monitor come alive. Congrats on well deserved WP.
Registered on September 5, 2008, 449 Posts, 2444 Comments
Comment posted by Mike Ramy on January 31, 2013 at 10:10 AM
Brad,
Outstanding as always,
Congrats on the WP . . . :toast:
Registered on June 16, 2012, 567 Posts, 2809 Comments