Great Bear Rainforest Critter-o-scape
I had to think twice when deciding where to post this image. It has 17 eagles in it, 6 gulls, and only one measly bear! So by numbers it should go in the avian gallery. But...I'm going to use biomass and argue that the one measly bear far outweighs those birds and post it here!
Like many wildlife photographers I often like coming away from a shooting session with some interesting close-up shots of my "prey". But, I'm always on alert for good animalscape shots - those images where you're trying to get "classic" shots of an animal in the landscape in which it resides. A lot of novice wildlife photographers are captivated and even pre-occupied by the thought of getting "full frame shots" of their subjects. For those of this ilk the biggest challenge they think they face is getting close enough to their subject for a "good" shot. But if one sticks with wildlife photography for any length of time a realization slowly starts to sink in - that good animalscape shots are almost always far tougher to pull off than those "full-frame" wildlife shots. In shooting a strong animalscape you face all the challenges that a landscape photographer faces in "building" a visual interesting image, plus you add in the challenge of incorporating mobile subjects that could care a less where they "should be" in the frame (those selfish beasts!).
I've been traveling into the Great Bear Rainforest on the central and northern BC coast twice a year since 2005. It's a magical, pristine place - National Geographic magazine referred to it as "The Wildest Place in North America" in August of 2011. I've obtained thousands of close-up shots of bears (and humpback whales, and eagles, and more) over the years and find now that I'm looking more and more for scenes that convey the full feeling, look, and essence of the Great Bear Rainforest. I shot this moody image of the Great Bear in September of 2012, but just got around to processing it recently (January of 2013). This shot was captured in a hard-to-access portion of a rarely visited inlet - in any given year only a handful of humans would get to this spot. I think anyone who sees this shot and has been in the Great Bear Rainforest would instantly think "yep, that's what the Great Bear is all about".
Animalscape shots can be tough to present online. They can have so much detail in them that much of it is lost in an image of 1200 pixels (long axis) or less. For instance, this shot contains a total of 17 eagles (both adults and immatures), 6 gulls, and one bear. So...for those dying to find all 17 eagles (and I willing to bet no one can find more than 16) or those who simply want to see the detail revealed in a larger version here...well...
here's a 2500 pixel version...
Subject: Small Great Bear Rainforest menagerie
Location: Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor 70-200mm VR zoom @ 135mm - hand-held from floating zodiac. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/160s @ f8; ISO 500. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: Very minor - this is over 95% of full-framed image
Additional details about the image (including processing details) available here:
http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/mammals/bears/.
Comments and critiques welcomed - probably best to view the larger version prior to doing so!
Cheers...
Brad
Comments
26 commentsClinton
HollyMorris
Thanks for the feedback...appreciated. A few specific responses:
1. Charlie...you asked: "So how did you get them to all look at the camera?"
Well, can't say much without violating NDA's, but doing a little work with software division of a camera company beginning with "N". Designing an app that allows manipulation of head position. Haven't named the product yet, but working name is "WoodYa Lookee Here". Still some bugs to work thru...if you look closely about half the eagles looking at you have Osprey heads and we have some new mixed species gulls there. But it got the bear head right, and looking in the right direction...
2. Gary...you said: "...I'm personally very concerned about the effect of declining salmon stocks on all the critters in your photo". Agreed...we are all concerned about that - the salmon are the key. Raincoast Conservation Foundation (www.raincoast.org) is doing the best work of all the environmental groups on the coast in fighting for the salmon. Good group and have a very progressive approach. Don't hesitate to look 'em up.
3. Vincent you said: "I must say that I do not understand you dare to post such large files on the net".
Yes, what you say reflects conventional thinking. But it's been my experience that posting large files has had the following results:
A. Increased web traffic
B. Increased sale of images
Of course image "thefts" are possible, but I have two questions that are relevant to the issue: Is the sort of person or group who would steal an image be a potential customer anyway? And, does their theft of the image actually devalue the image or interfere with another sale of it? In most cases I think the answer to both questions is "no".
I have tracked down many of my illegally used images on the web and almost invariably they are from one of two sources:
• Kids "community" websites, and commonly Wolf "Fantasy" sites (where kids create wolf packs - complete with wolf images sourced on the web and with stories woven around them). Doesn't bother me to help these kids out (and all the images they use still have copyright info and URL on them) and...
• Conservation groups. Sigh....you'd think these good guys would just ask. And when I confront them about it they have always instantly pulled the image down and/or agreed to pay me for the use of it. In some cases I have felt strongly enough about the cause to permit the image use, but it must carry a photo credit complete with URL plus a link to my website.
Anyway...I only post large images (the 2400 pix or larger) if it's needed to effectively convey the essence of the image. Which almost only happens with animalscape type images, which are, in my opinion, often hard to effectively convey at 1200 pix or less.
At the end of the day I suppose it's analogous to musicians posting free recordings on YouTube. 99% of the time the "stolen" images used online still bear my copyright info...so it could be considered a form of exposure/marketing. But then I'm not posting any "famous" images!
Cheers...
Brad
Thanks for the thoughtful feedback - you're the only one to notice the trees touching the lower left edge and I TOTALLY agree with you. Actually, there is a TAD more space there (less than 100 pixels) but it leads into more trees. I suppose I could recrop including that area and do a "clear cut" and remove the trees with the clone tool to create a space, but that goes beyond what I'm comfortable doing to an image. But the bottom line is that I truly wish there was a small gap on the left side separating the trees from the left edge of the frame. Good catch on that.
Cheers...
Brad
A Work of Art Brad
Ken Archer
I continue to enjoy your in depth comments!
As for the image, it has all been said!
Jagdeep Rajput
Really special.
...I can't even find 16 eagles.....I think I only got to 14. Might be tough to see some of those immature ones.
Love being able to view the larger one...
I do think you can perhaps extract a tad more shadow detail, especially in the foreground blacks and the bear?
Thanks for sharing that 2500 pix version. Wowwee! The detail and superb colors and light ...glad to see my 27'' monitor come alive. Congrats on well deserved WP.
Outstanding as always,
Congrats on the WP . . .