Glacier NP Waterfall
by Bruce King
Seems like forever since I lasted posted an image. As Mr. Beatle once said, "life is what happens when" blah, blah, blah.
Anyway, this is a shot from a GNP workshop with David Cobb and Zach Schnepf last September. Is it too dark? Lightening it in PP just didn't seem to work for me so I left it pretty much as it came out of the camera regarding exposure. Don't know the name of the creek we hiked down into but it had potential so there may be more posts coming from this area. Filter from Nik CEP 3 added just because I like it.
Thanks for looking.
Comments
9 commentsThe result of all that is a different image, however, from the one you have created. I've been in situations like that reflected in your image and it has the right feel to me as it is. Because often times in the deep forest things are dark and you have this issue of keeping everything in in terms of dynamic range. If you shoot in raw you will have at least 12 or 14 bit depth to work with, and I think it's possible to do a three or four level HDR using a single RAW input with exposures adjusted to make the three or four input images.
But, again, I think your image has a certain feel to it that is good and true and it need not have to conform to some external, arbitrary standard of luminance, in my opinion. It is making a statement that makes me remember things as they were.
Finally, your use of extended exposure has created a very nice, feathery and soft feel in the waterfall. I think its initial diagonal direction is effective in bringing the eye into the center and I like how that is balanced by the bright green bush over on the right and the bright area of horizontal specular reflectance on the rock below that and just above the deep green pool.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Overall, I don't think it's too dark, there's good detail throughout most of the scene - with the exception of the area immediately adjacent to the falls. That's all pretty dark, in fact no detail at all. Now I don't always want or need to see detail everywhere, but sometimes it is important. What's interesting is that I like the contrast an exposure of the forested area up top, but find the contrast too much in the rock and bottom part of the image.
Hard to say without having the raw file, but sounds like John has some good suggestions. Certainly worth looking in to. I think you have a great scene and very good composition.
Lon
Chris