Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Durdle Door Coastline
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Durdle Door Coastline

by Guy Edwardes

Gallery: LandscapePosted December 6, 20043,931 views22 comments
Taken this afternoon at the famous rock arch of Durdle Door on the south coast of England.

Again, two exposures combined in PS. To me one of the major benefits of digital capture for landscape photography is the ability to control contrast without the limitations of a straight line graduated ND filter.

EOS 1Ds, 17-40L, Polariser, ISO 50, 2 seconds @ F22 (foreground exposure).

Comments

22 comments
Comment posted by John Zinn on December 6, 2004 at 7:56 PM
Fantastic seascape Guy!! I love how your compositions always tie the water to the land and the sky. That wonderful sweeping waterline and the starburst in the arch really set this one apart.

John Zinn
Registered on November 1, 2003, 41 Posts, 1743 Comments
Comment posted by Vito Paratore on December 6, 2004 at 7:58 PM
wow...to say it was gorgeous would be an understatement!
i love the swoop of water, and the rays from the sun!
the great light on the far right stuff doesn't hurt either!

may i ask...how did you go about combining them? did you mask? if you masked...did wat did you do at the high contrast areas...like the middle part of the arch? did you use a hard brush and take a while to get close to the edge?

i've tried combining shots before, and the edges always looked weird (probably because i knew they weren't supposed to look like that lol)

well, great shot! it's gorgeous...i hope you've printed this one!
Vito
Registered on September 18, 2004, 42 Posts, 349 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on December 6, 2004 at 8:28 PM
<B>"two exposures combined in PS."</B>

That is definitely the key to overcoming the limitations of both digital and film capture. Very well done here, Guy. The curve of the water line is just fantastic.

Curious, this would be national park here in the U.S. How do you avoid footprints in the sand.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Anil Rao on December 6, 2004 at 8:41 PM
Guy, I love the sweeping curve and how it ties the foreground to the horizon on the background. The arch with the sun also perfectly balances the image on the left. Really well done.
Registered on November 15, 2003, 234 Posts, 4923 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Helms on December 6, 2004 at 9:02 PM
Guy,

I have to agree with everyone else this is a beaut.The shoreline,clouds and the arch make this one.I do seem to be noticing what appears to be flare or something around the sun.It is not that important and in no way takes away from what you have here I just find it a little distracting.

Also agree about the blend to get around the limitations.I have yet to use such a feature,but I can see why it is needed.

Thanks for sharing.
Registered on November 28, 2003, 37 Posts, 1005 Comments
Comment posted by Joseph Kayne on December 6, 2004 at 9:05 PM
Besides echoing all of the flattering comments, Guy, I am dying to run right into that water.

Good work.

Joe.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 573 Posts, 2619 Comments
Comment posted by Dane Glueck on December 6, 2004 at 9:12 PM
Not bad for a day's outing :wink: . Love the sunburst and the curve of the sand. A lesson in great composition.
Registered on November 10, 2003, 193 Posts, 1748 Comments
Comment posted by Todd Caudle on December 6, 2004 at 9:18 PM
Unreal! I love the sweep of the water, the moment caught of the sun, the light, and anything else you can mention about this. Fantastic!
Registered on November 9, 2003, 472 Posts, 3705 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Curtis on December 6, 2004 at 9:53 PM
This is simply astonishing. Not sure what else to say.
Registered on August 31, 2004, 82 Posts, 368 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Lowe on December 6, 2004 at 10:18 PM
Simply amazing. :toast:

Ed
Registered on February 7, 2004, 414 Posts, 7115 Comments
Comment posted by George Hall, Jr on December 6, 2004 at 10:39 PM
So beautiful..can almost hear the silent surf. Wish I was walking there right about now. Very nice :toast:
Registered on July 11, 2004, 283 Posts, 2395 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Windom on December 6, 2004 at 11:48 PM
Outstanding!! :toast: I'll be coming back to look at this one several more times.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 176 Posts, 2302 Comments
Comment posted by Kenneth Kijewski on December 7, 2004 at 7:41 AM
I ditto all compliments :toast:
Registered on February 17, 2004, 166 Posts, 3390 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Greer on December 7, 2004 at 8:13 AM
WHat else is there to say? Awesome!

:toast: I'll toast to this one!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 404 Posts, 1977 Comments
Comment posted by Erik Stensland on December 7, 2004 at 9:30 AM
Guy, this is amazing! I just spent a little time on your website and it is filled with images of this quality. You have some terrific photos! My wife is from the SW UK and so we spend time there every year, but I can't say that I've ever come away with anything that can compare. Thank you for giving me a fresh burst of energy and inspiration this morning!

Erik

<i>Perhaps if I changed my name to "Guy" like Mr. Tal or Mr. Edwards, my photos would improve. Hmmm. :biggrin: </i>

Registered on September 27, 2004, 121 Posts, 718 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on December 7, 2004 at 11:44 AM
Fantastic image, Guy. This is certainly a testament to the power of digital imaging and your mastery of the process.
By the way, what is a Durdle?

Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Edwardes on December 7, 2004 at 4:37 PM
Thanks for the comments!

Vito,
I always find it difficult to answer digital questions without demonstrating on-screen. Basically I layered the lighter foreground exposure over the darker exposure for the sky. I then erased the top layer to reveal the sky (and other highlights) beneath. I did this in stages using different sized brushes at varying opacities until the contrast range in the image was roughly balanced - I tend to use quite large brush sizes at a low opacity and overlap the edges of the contrasting areas grading them until I get the desired result. I then applied levels and colour balance adjustments to each layer to fine-tune the overall balance of the image. Hope this makes sense
:rolleyes:.

Guy,
I have no idea what a "durdle" is - I've never really thought about it! However, I will endeavour to find out for you :smile:.

Erik,
Feel free to get in touch before your next visit to the UK. I'd be happy to recommend some good locations - specific to the time of year that you're here.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 45 Posts, 279 Comments
Comment posted by Dave Miess on December 7, 2004 at 4:59 PM
Amazingly beautiful - what a wonderful image!
Registered on August 22, 2004, 15 Posts, 22 Comments
Comment posted by Vito Paratore on December 7, 2004 at 6:28 PM
hey guy
i see wat you mean...i'll have to try it again with the low opacity stuff...
lol, i think i just tried to do it too fast ;)
Vito
Registered on September 18, 2004, 42 Posts, 349 Comments
Comment posted by Carl Donohue on December 8, 2004 at 12:48 AM
Hey Guy,

Stunning. As usual. :smile:

Cheers

Carl
Registered on November 1, 2003, 46 Posts, 589 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Edwardes on December 8, 2004 at 3:05 PM
Guy,
Apparently (and quite logically I guess) the name "durdle" derives from the Old English word for pierced.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 45 Posts, 279 Comments
Comment posted by Daniella T. on January 22, 2005 at 1:51 AM
wow, amazing gorgious light! the composition is really beautiful.

:toast:
Registered on January 9, 2004, 41 Posts, 512 Comments