Phendrana's Edge +Update
by Alex Noriega
Oregon's Crater Lake, under a wintry night sky. Check out an updated version (in a larger res on a dark background) at the Purchase Print link above (crop/warp to take care of the lower-left corner's bareness and fix overall balance).
Shot this on my first day ever in Oregon this March, en route to my new home in Portland. I'm not the biggest fan of this angle of the lake, as the perspective on Wizard Island is much more interesting when you're right above it. However, I didn't have snowshoes, so a mile or mile and a half was about the maximum I was willing to trudge from Rim Village, sinking knee-deep in snow, after driving for 12 hours. With zero cloud/sky action, I turned to my usual fallback - the stars.
Canon 5D, 24-105L
Landscape/sky exposure: 6 minutes, ISO 100, f/22, 2-stop GND over sky
Star exposure: 30 seconds, ISO 3200, f/4 (overlaid with Lighten layer)
Comments
28 commentsI definitely like this on a dark background, as you have provided. Bet you were tired after capturing this!
Nathan: Floris Van Breugel has an excellent tutorial on twilight/star blends to get you started, right here on NPN. I have my own touches/techniques, but he covers the basics of it in that article.
Kory, I was unsure about the overall balance myself, but I didn't have a ton of time to find a more detailed foreground cornice - this is the first interesting and pristine one I could find on my hike up. Ideally I'd have found something with snowdrift detail like my second time at Crater Lake. Also, I had a tree directly to the left of my tripod, so if I wanted the snow cornice to strike the corner of the frame, I couldn't really move from this spot.
aF
Aaron, there's about an hour delay between the landscape and the sky exposure. The entire point of overlaying the star exposure is that the stars are only just starting to show up when the twilight is perfect on the landscape, so they don't quite come through in a typical ISO 100, f/11 exposure yet at that time. Usually I go with ISO 1600, f/4, 30 seconds for the star one - not sure why I went to 3200 here, but I had to darken the exposure so that only the stars were coming through. All you need is the white points, you don't want any lingering sky color. There is a period of time where you can still see light on the landscape, a gradient in the sky, and the stars coming out with your bare eyes - and that's what I seek to convey with the blends.
I'd say this is pretty successful even if it's not your favorite side of the lake.. ;-) The stars really dominate the scene here which is interesting too because there isn't so much sky present - it's all in the reflection.
I don't consider this a nit, but an observation. I haven't tried it... but I'm wondering about a 5% crop left and bottom to reduce the amount of real estate the snow bank takes up. Just a smidge maybe? I know there is some nice texture in the snow, but still it's a uniform space, that well, takes up a lot of space. Don't get me wrong, I like it, just thinking out loud I guess.
Lon
edit: just read your remarks and also checked out the version on your website. Never mind! That version is awesome.
Excellent
Congrats on the WP!
Sandy