Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Preston's Tree
‹ PreviousLandscape GalleryNext ›

Preston's Tree

by Lon Overacker

Gallery: LandscapePosted September 7, 2012335 views31 comments
Well, not really his tree, but it is the same tree that's featured in one my favorite prints of his. The detail in the print is just amazing.

So this is the same tree obviously from a wider vantage point. Captured this past May. It's a rare occasion that one gets to photograph fleeting light with the 4x5, but this one afternoon in El Capitan Meadow of Yosemite, the typical Sierra sky filled up with clouds as the day progressed. I watched as bands of light passed over the meadow, catching this broken down old black oak. I set up in hopes of catching this tree bathed in light with the background dark. I knew at the time also that I would process this in b&w.

In full disclosure, this is a blend of 2 exposures to take care of some extraneous light in the bg and copious amounts of cloning of a dozen or more tourons in the far meadow behind the oaks.

Yeah, another tree... and an ordinary composition to boot. Just wondering if this strikes anyone. Your comments and critique are always welcomed!

4x5, V100F, 300mm, f/32 @ 1/8s

Thanks folks!

Lon

Comments

31 comments
Comment posted by Bret Edge on September 7, 2012 at 7:18 PM
I think it's a lovely portrait of a beautiful tree, Lon. The light is fantastic and works well to isolate this great tree from the dark background. Very nice!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 711 Posts, 6363 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hansen on September 7, 2012 at 7:40 PM
Grand old oak, nicely isolated.
Registered on May 5, 2011, 161 Posts, 908 Comments
Comment posted by Eva McDermott on September 7, 2012 at 8:16 PM
You tree portraits are always so amazingly beautiful Lon. Your B&W conversion works well here. Love it!
Registered on January 4, 2009, 1015 Posts, 13229 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on September 7, 2012 at 9:06 PM
Beautiful black and white image! Full of feeling! :smile:

Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on September 7, 2012 at 9:11 PM
I really like this one, Lon. I'd recalled Preston's very fine shot of this tree also, but your version is very different with the angle of view here and B&W conversion too.
Not sure if it's the light or the B&W conversion, maybe both, but it has a haunting look to it. It surely does provide a super look at a very grand old tree. :cool:
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on September 7, 2012 at 9:28 PM
It has a very Ansel-esque quality to it, Lon. Really like the contrast and the excellent textures.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on September 7, 2012 at 10:12 PM
Having just gone through Ansel Adam's 400 photographs minutes ago, this tree rings true to what the wonderful photos I just looked at. My only alteration would be shifting the shadow values from zone 0-1 to 1-2 for a bit more detail ( sorry, thinking in the zone system ) Yesterday I finished Michael Frye's Digital Landscape Photography. Oh, and today, fedex delivered Vincent Versace's From Oz to Kansas, the new book with every B/W conversion technique known to man. (although he never contacted me for my own techniques, wink ) Late summer brings photographic drought, so I educate in the ways of others.

Absolutely wonderful photography here Lon, what a specimen you found. I would be in tree heaven, love my trees. I'd pop a bit more detail from the shadows and that's it.

:toast: and a +1 to Bret's critique as well.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on September 7, 2012 at 10:15 PM
P.S. I bet this photo would absolutely sing printed on an Epson 9900 with Crane Museo Silver Rag paper at 45" on the long...
:wink:
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on September 7, 2012 at 11:12 PM
A stunning portrait with an almost mystical feel. The light on the tree is perfect against the dark bg. Beautiful work
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel Rappaport on September 7, 2012 at 11:29 PM
Great job isolating and simplifying.
Registered on September 9, 2009, 294 Posts, 2006 Comments
Comment posted by Kyle L. Krause on September 7, 2012 at 11:48 PM
This came out beautiful Lon. I remember that day well, the light was dancing all around the meadows. Works nice in B&W Great job!
Registered on June 15, 2010, 29 Posts, 605 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on September 8, 2012 at 1:18 AM
Sweet!!! Extraordinary maybe, but certainly nothing ordinary about this. The light trunk against the dark BG is extra special - print this baby LARGE!
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on September 8, 2012 at 3:05 AM
You isolated it very well Lon. Lovely portrait.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on September 8, 2012 at 4:15 AM
It's a very nice tree shot Lon. I like the isolation of it's lighter tone... looks fabulous in b&w.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Dietrich Gloger on September 8, 2012 at 4:37 AM
Hi Lon, good to see another one of your more recent images!
I think your plans to use the light-contrast work out great here. That is special light on the tree, and with the dark bg it creates a special scene. Scenes in such light are always candidates for a bw conversion. Perhaps bw is the best choice even?

Ok, if you are picky on my images, then I am too :wink: . There is that dead piece of wood in the lower right, further into the bg. I know there is no chance to clone this and perhaps that would be too much of "manipulation", but I find it (a tad) distracting. For some reason, my eyes are pulled there, perhaps cause my mind would like to recognize what it is, thus it draws more attention than it deserved.

Nevertheless, a very elegant and "artsy" image, well representing the beauty of yosemite (now that I know the place :biggrin:)




Registered on January 26, 2007, 360 Posts, 9876 Comments
Comment posted by John&Patty Benway on September 8, 2012 at 5:35 AM
Lon, this is very appealing, the soft light within the grasses and tree along with the dark BG makes this a real standout, love to see it in print. Beautiful work.
John
Registered on May 12, 2006, 626 Posts, 8700 Comments
Comment posted by Harley Goldman on September 8, 2012 at 8:32 AM
Awesome image, Lon!! I think it is one of my all time favortie Overackers. Beautiful.

I don't see so much Ansel Adams, but more John Sexton in this one.
Registered on November 19, 2003, 586 Posts, 11271 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on September 8, 2012 at 9:06 AM
Lon, That's a great tree and it stands out beautifully from the background in this capture. This has the "classic" b&w look and feel.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on September 8, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Works for me, Lon! Nice subject. To be super picky, feels maybe a bit tight/confined to me. But i like. :smile:
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Hamed Musharbak on September 8, 2012 at 12:21 PM
the master beats again :wink:

:toast:
Registered on June 1, 2009, 372 Posts, 2282 Comments
Comment posted by Preston Birdwell on September 8, 2012 at 1:33 PM
Lon,

I rank this one as top tier. This one really sings and is deserving of a fine print. Boosting the darkest shadow values for a Web image may be fine, but those dark values would give a very rich black for a print. Compositonally, I think the frame is just right; it doesn't feel too tight to me.

The oaks in El Cap meadow are special, and this old sentinel no less so. Thanks for your kind comment about my version of this fine old tree.

Just excellent work, here!

--P
Registered on November 1, 2003, 471 Posts, 5188 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on September 8, 2012 at 3:28 PM
Thanks everyone for your comments, I appreciate it very much.

Dietrich - I see what you mean about the dead piece of wood. It's actually a very large fallen tree, in fact those tourons I cloned out, maybe a 8-10 of them were all standing on that trunk. And I didn't clone them out in the traditional sense, I blended the clean log in from another exposure. ;-)

As far as the tightness, I see the point too, but any wider and you have the road to the left and just more trees to the right, so I felt a good compromise; more of a portrait rather than a landscape.

It's been sad to watch the deterioration of these wonderful trees over the last 30 years or so... But just like us, they don't live forever..

Thanks!
Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Baumbach on September 8, 2012 at 5:35 PM
Wonderful image, Lon. Nice work with the b&w conversion. I can see why there are comparisons with Ansel Adams. This has a very classic look to it.

It was nice seeing Preston's version too. I'd never seen it before.

- Dan

Registered on November 1, 2003, 473 Posts, 7980 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Apodaca on September 8, 2012 at 7:48 PM
Tourists! :wink: Good thing for cloning. But then again, am I considered a tourist when I head up to the local national park? Anyways, nice shot. I love old, dead trees (sounds horrible, I know). They can be so different, and have so many designs. I thoroughly enjoyed the large version.

Also, a huge 'thanks' for the contribution you make to this site. Both your images and critiques are greatly appreciated! Keep the pics coming!
Registered on November 16, 2011, 67 Posts, 1127 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on September 8, 2012 at 9:46 PM
Nathan,

As far as the tourist thing goes, yeah, we're all tourists at one time or another and there's no doubt that I've probably been cloned out of many other photographer's Yosemite image... :wink:

And thanks very much for the kind words Nathan, appreciated very much.

Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on September 8, 2012 at 10:01 PM
I like the tree which you've chosen to compose, and the B&W rendition works well.
Your composition shows excellent detail in the branches and limbs. The tree color
contrasts well with the background. Nice job, Lon.
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on September 8, 2012 at 10:22 PM
Wow, the large version is so much better. The small one looks a little flat on my monitor.
The blurred grass and the brighter partial intruders on the right are a bit of a distraction, but just a wee bit. You continue to make art out of trees.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Karsten Wrobel on September 9, 2012 at 12:08 PM
Lon, the light on the tree makes this very special... as does the tree itself... I 'd be interested to know what it looks like with a bit more room / the tree not being dead center, but this is outstanding as is
Registered on November 1, 2008, 117 Posts, 851 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on September 9, 2012 at 9:32 PM
Preston's Tree, huh? Well, with all the detail you capture with that 4x5, I should be able to see his name on it, I would think! :razz:

It is a stately old tree with nice form. And, you did catch it in some sweet light!

Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Chikku Baiju on September 10, 2012 at 12:46 AM
This is a great tree portrait! Love the light and the dark background.
Registered on January 9, 2010, 31 Posts, 246 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Clothier on September 11, 2012 at 7:21 PM
The light hitting that tree makes for a striking b&w Lon, love it. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2010, 343 Posts, 2257 Comments