Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Touching the Void
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Touching the Void

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted August 2, 2012488 views11 comments
Touching the Void

My apologies to Joe Simpson for co-opting the title of his excellent book for this image...

As a terrestrial being who limits most of his aquatic activity to the surface region of waters, I always think of the depths below as mysterious "voids" that may contain...well...most anything my imagination can conjure up. Bears, in contrast, seem to have no such reservations and they just wade right in! When this female grizzly lowered her snout and kissed the water's surface (and her reflection) it was - at least to me - a particularly evocative moment in time. It was like she was "touching the void". I felt fortunate to be there to record it.

Posting a dark, moody image like this in a digital format (i.e., online) has some risk to it. A key to this image is the soft, delicate - and somewhat nuanced - lighting striking the bear. The brightness of the display of the device used to view this image will make a large difference to how this image appears, which is totally out of my control. But I do have a suggestion: if the lighting of this image doesn't appear "right" to you, simply change the angle of view (tilt) of your viewing device to suit your taste. And there you go - your own custom image! :wink:

I've heard many people say that photography has gotten "easier" since it has gone through the digital revolution. This is probably true for the "snap-shooting" public - they can capture images with their compact cell phones that in many ways surpass the quality of what they usually captured with their 35mm SLR's. And today's digital images are certainly easier and more convenient to share than their old print or slides were.

But some serious photographers - from virtually all the various disciplines of photography - have struggled with the transition to digital photography. On one hand, the bar has gotten FAR higher - we can now capture images that couldn't have even been considered a few short years ago. And, on the other hand, the processing of images is no longer something you normally "hand-off" to a faceless lab - it has fallen squarely in the lap of the photographer. There were, of course, always SOME photographers who processed their own images (Ansel Adams might come to mind). But for the majority of nature and wildlife photographers the process functionally ended the moment they released the shutter. Inheriting the processing of the images is something that many nature photographers have been reluctant to accept (often because they simply don't enjoy sitting in front of a computer). But those relatively few nature photographers who have chosen to "dive right in" (into the void??) often end up with the ability to regularly produce images that far surpass those less comfortable with "pushing pixels" around. Yes, image capture is critical (Garbage In, Garbage Out), but for many images the processing is just as important (and sometimes MORE important) to the success of the final image.

And...those who REALLY get digital and pay attention to their processing soon realize that what they've learned behind the computer can affect the way they capture their images. This image is a good example of what I mean. When capturing this dark scene I was keenly aware that I had to under-expose the scene fairly dramatically - if I let the light meter attempt to produce a "neutral gray" scene on this one the critical lighter regions on the bear's snout and nose would have been completely blown out. But, because of my past experience behind the computer processing D4 files I knew I could use a variety of digital techniques to draw out the shadow details and work the mid-tones on the bear to return this scene to how I perceived it in the field. If I hadn't had this experience it's likely I would have refrained from under-exposing the image to the degree I did and would have risked blowing out the highlights, which would have pretty much killed the shot.

Just some MORE food for thought (sorry if I've over-filled your belly, Ajit :wink: ).

Subject: Adult female Grizzly (Urus arctos) wading right in
Location: Khutzeymateen Inlet, Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor 400mm f2.8 VRII lens - hand-held. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/400s @ f4.5; ISO 1250. -1.67 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: This is about 90% of the full-framed image.

Additional details about the image (including processing details) available here:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/.

Comments and critiques welcomed - definitely best to view the larger version prior to doing so!

Cheers...thanks for looking...

Brad

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on August 2, 2012 at 2:51 PM
This is sweet!! Far better than most wildlife shots (not that I view a lot of them) simply because it's not a mug shot - the bear is actually doing something interesting. I love the expanding rings around the bear and the somewhat dark nature of the image. Very well done. Excellent work Brad.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Jerry Austin on August 2, 2012 at 5:52 PM
One of your best, Brad. Beautiful simplicity. :toast:
Registered on January 6, 2012, 651 Posts, 3448 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Turner on August 2, 2012 at 10:48 PM
Great moment in nature. Wonderful in every detail. :toast:
Registered on February 18, 2012, 534 Posts, 2755 Comments
Comment posted by James Campbell on August 3, 2012 at 2:24 AM
I really love the dark tones and the simplicity of this image... Beautiful :toast:
Registered on January 12, 2009, 48 Posts, 377 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on August 3, 2012 at 9:19 AM
A very good read, wonderful image Brad.
I especially like the low key look, reflection, and overall mood the shot conveys..
Great moment, great title as well.
Have a nice weekend! :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on August 3, 2012 at 11:26 PM
Aah! For the image. BURP! For the 'food'! But, seriously, this is another masterpiece - brooding, mysterious, prehistoric, frightening even!
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by Stephen Kaluski on August 4, 2012 at 12:52 PM
Hi Brad, interesting how the 'darkness' and softer tones begin to dominate and actually set the scene and play more of a role than, dare I say, the subject? Interesting you say about viewing it, when opened up in PS and looked at the Levels, if I move in on the RHS to say 210, to meet the Histogram, boy does it change the look & feel. Have you thought about pano crop?

Interesting read as ever, like the thinking behind the image. Off to play with the 1Dx :wink:

TFS
Steve
Registered on March 25, 2007, 189 Posts, 1064 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on August 5, 2012 at 9:58 AM
Hey all,

Thanks for the feedback no this one. It was a nice scene to watch unfold, but that doesn't always translate into a good image!

Steve: You mentioned about the levels and adjusting the white point (to match the brightest tones in the image). Agreed that it totally changes the image, but that change moves it away from what I was hoping to convey with it. On the pano crop (presumably removing some foreground) - considered it but simply (and quite subjectively) preferred this crop (which is very minimal). I think (but can't say this definitively) that going to a symmetrical or near symmetrical crop - which is pretty much the only way I can get to pano - raises the reflection in overall dominance a little more than I wanted...

Cheers...thanks much for the considered comments...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Stephen Kaluski on August 5, 2012 at 4:19 PM
Steve: You mentioned about the levels and adjusting the white point (to match the brightest tones in the image). Agreed that it totally changes the image, but that change moves it away from what I was hoping to convey with it.

Exactly Brad, the look & feel gets away from the OP look & feel you wished to convey. :wavey:
Registered on March 25, 2007, 189 Posts, 1064 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on August 6, 2012 at 3:52 PM
I waited to comment until I had the chance to view this image at my home color calibrated monitor and my work monitor (not-calibrated) and it was interesting to see the difference when you do change your angle of view. I like the darker mood to this and how the bear stands out plus you have just enough eye contact to make this work. Interesting to read your approach for conveying what you wanted. The larger image fur detail is outstanding.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on August 7, 2012 at 9:44 PM
I really like the low angle on this Brad. I also like your decision to leave a fairly large amount of water on the bottom. I think most people would have cropped this just below the reflection. I think doing that would change he feel of this. For me, the dark water leads me into the lighter reflection and makes the reflection have a larger impact into the subject, but that's just my two cents.
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments