Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Bashful Bruin
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Bashful Bruin

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted July 30, 2012387 views12 comments
Bashful Bruin

When you're over two meters tall and weigh over 200 kg (that's about 450 lb for those of you south of the border!), it's kinda hard to hide behind a few small leaves. But that didn't stop this bear from trying just that!

This is one of those images that drives me a bit crazy. I go from loving the shot to being frustrated by it - every single time I look at it. The issue in my mind: do those out-of-focus leaves just below the eye constitute a major distraction or do they actually add to the image (given that the bear appears to be trying - completely in vain - to hide behind them)? I love the bear's left eye and how the bear is draping its head over its paws (and those claws work well for me too).

I have no doubt that I will be able to put this shot to good use. And it's likely it will generate at least some revenue. So it does have value.

This image points out at least one more thing worth considering - with some images there is a vast difference between how the public perceives an image vs. how other photographers perceive it. Most members of the public simply react to images - the images have an impact on them or they don't. They don't know why - and they don't care. It works or it doesn't. And, I suspect that this image would be received well by most non-photographers - the pose, and especially that eye, are powerful enough to illicit a reaction.

Many photographers, on the other hand, often like to dissect - or break down an image - into its "building blocks". This is very understandable - they're simply trying to understand why some images work and others don't. In doing so we hope to figure out what elements individually contribute to the success (or lack thereof) of a specific image. So we end up with a set of "rules" to follow when building an image - things like the "rule of thirds", using "leading lines", avoid distracting elements, etc. This dissection of an image has value. But...there is a danger to this: you can end up seeing all the individual trees but never even consider what the forest looked like! in other words, in an effort to understand what makes an image work, you can overlook the fact that it simply DOES work (and that not all images need to conform to a few simple rules of image construction).

Just some food for thought...

Subject: Adult female Grizzly (Urus arctos) facing a decision
Location: Khutzeymateen Inlet, Great Bear Rainforest, BC, Canada
Camera: Nikon D4
Lens: Nikkor 400mm f2.8 VRII lens - hand-held. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/400s @ f7.1; ISO 3600. -0.67 stop compensation from matrix-metered exposure setting.
Crop: This is about 85% of the full-framed image.

Additional details about the image (including processing details) available here:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/detail_2.html.

Comments and critiques welcomed - definitely best to view the larger version prior to doing so!

Cheers...thanks for looking...

Brad

Comments

12 comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on July 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM
It's a beauty Brad. IMHO, the leaves certainly do not add to the image, but they really don't distract either. The "value" of the image, for me anyway, is in the "cuteness" of the pose. The eyes tell a big story here, and the claws help with that story. Take this critique for what it's worth from a non-wildlife photog.
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Wick Smith on July 30, 2012 at 6:48 PM
It's a great shot - I like the large version as it shows the sharpness around the eyes. The foreground leaves are only a minor distraction for me. I like it as it is. Hope it sells well!
Registered on June 12, 2009, 91 Posts, 379 Comments
Comment posted by Butch Lama on July 30, 2012 at 7:15 PM
Very captivating image. I want to know is who give the bear a buzz cut on his fore head :wink:
Registered on July 23, 2010, 42 Posts, 316 Comments
Comment posted by Jamie Douglas on July 31, 2012 at 12:27 AM
The fact the eye is so sharp and well lit takes the attention away from the small leaves just below it.

One day I will join you for a tour.

Jamie
Registered on July 16, 2012, 10 Posts, 87 Comments
Comment posted by Morkel Erasmus on July 31, 2012 at 4:31 AM
Well, Brad, interesting thoughts as usual (love reading your posts)...
My thoughts? This one DOES work. And it works well. At least for me...

It succeeds in that crucial aspect that is lacking in so much of the photography we see online every day - it tells a story. The picture is worth the proverbial 1000 words (okay, maybe fewer words, but the metaphor is valid :wink:).
:toast:
Registered on March 22, 2011, 385 Posts, 2068 Comments
Comment posted by Ajit Huilgol on July 31, 2012 at 7:50 AM
For me - there is a little too much clutter, especially in the lower left corner, but more than made up by the eye contact and those massive claws. As for 'some food for thought' - my 'thought stomach' is full! You really express yourself so well!
Registered on December 19, 2008, 302 Posts, 2055 Comments
Comment posted by David Hemmings on July 31, 2012 at 8:29 AM
Firstly, beautiful image. The oof leaves are certainly not a major distraction in my eyes nor do they really "add" to the image. The image is good with or without them imo. Nature photography has become subject to too many rules and I think that it distracts and takes away from the pure pleasure of viewing pieces of art like this one:)
Registered on May 26, 2006, 178 Posts, 1680 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on July 31, 2012 at 11:36 AM
Hey all,

Thanks to the feedback so far on this image. A few specific responses:

1. Butch: You say (mostly in jest I assume): "I want to know is who give the bear a buzz cut on his fore head"

Interestingly, this "male-pattern baldness" is common in the bears in this region. And, more often than not, it's most visible and/or pronounced in some of the older males. But, as this image shows, some of the females exhibit the characteristic as well. I think it's just a local genetic thing...

2. David: You say: "Nature photography has become subject to too many rules and I think that it distracts and takes away from the pure pleasure of viewing pieces of art..."

While I tend to agree with you, if there's a place where images should be nit-picked, it's here in a critiquing gallery! I have heard from some newer members who have been more than a little intimidated and have wondered why images of theirs that have gone over well elsewhere get "beaten up" in here. My commentary was designed to answer this question and to bring up the "can't see the forest for the trees" concept that can show it's head in a critiquing environment - as mentioned above (and that you're alluding to). I think one of the greatest dangers of forums like this is the tendency towards "group think" in terms of those "rules" of photography - which is a huge impediment to creativity. Confident, mature/advanced photographers can (and largely do) ignore that tendency, but it's much tougher for developing photographers to ignore or even recognize the onset of "group think". :wink:

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on August 1, 2012 at 4:13 AM
This is a great shot Brad!!! It has the "WOW" factor for sure. That expressive eye and those claws are awesome, for me the leaves do not distract but add to the image. As for rules, when I am photographing nature I don't consciously follow any creative rules. If it looks good one way I shoot, if the same subject looks good another way, I shoot some more, and some more.:biggrin:

Very Nice Work Brad!!!

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Jim Hackley on August 2, 2012 at 1:39 PM
A wonderful image that works for me because of the eye contact and the head resting over the paws. Those eyes draw you right into the image and I also like the excellent detail on the fur. Interesting enough at first glance the leaves were not a distraction to me until I read your comment. Excellent image for iso 3600 and I also enjoy reading your in depth comments.
Registered on September 17, 2009, 302 Posts, 5535 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on August 2, 2012 at 5:20 PM
To me the out of focus leaves add a sense of depth, inviting one to look into the picture.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on August 5, 2012 at 5:22 PM
Cool portrait Brad. I especially like the bears eye..and those claws shred man :wink:
Well done :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments