Comment posted by Morris McClung on July 22, 2012 at 11:01 AM
Nice comp and mood, and the stars are excellent pinpoints. The large version with it's middle gray background allows more of the detail you have in the darker areas to show through. It has the definite "feel" of twilight. Very well done.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Nancy Lea Sandy on July 22, 2012 at 11:11 AM
Beautiful, serene and mystic. You captured a fine mood with this one
Registered on January 24, 2011, 576 Posts, 6942 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on July 22, 2012 at 12:05 PM
Alex, You really captured the twilight mood here! Wonderful color and I love the looks of the stars without having the trails. Makes me feel like I'm there watching this. Really nice!
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Reed on July 22, 2012 at 12:36 PM
Peaceful.
Registered on September 19, 2009, 198 Posts, 1074 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on July 22, 2012 at 12:51 PM
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Tom Hilton on July 22, 2012 at 1:30 PM
Excellent concept, capture and processing.
Very well accomplished.
Registered on September 19, 2011, 68 Posts, 668 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Coskun on July 22, 2012 at 1:36 PM
I love these twilight shots. Perfect amount of stars and perfect amount of detail and color. The large version really presents that well.
Registered on October 31, 2011, 170 Posts, 1240 Comments
Comment posted by Basil Greber on July 22, 2012 at 2:05 PM
A great shot. I like it a lot. I also appreciate the foreground detail in the link you provided.
I'm wondering - did you do any noise reduction on the sky here? It looks very, very clean (meaning - good! ). If that's what the D7000 delivers under these conditions out of the box, I'll have to grab my credit card.
Registered on November 8, 2005, 219 Posts, 1340 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on July 22, 2012 at 2:12 PM
Basil: the D7000 has the best crop sensor on the market, in terms of noise level and dynamic range. The foreground rocks were almost completely black in the raw exposure - the way you can bring up shadows cleanly and pull down highlights is like nothing I've seen before. As far as crop bodies go, I can't recommend it enough - though if I had the funds, I'd rather be on a modern full-frame body.
The sky gradient is so clean because it's from the ISO 100 exposure. The stars are simply overlaid on that clean exposure from a separate ISO 1600 exposure taken an hour later at the exact same spot. That having been said, the D7000 does compare favorably to the 5D Mark II at high ISOs, and I probably could have gotten away with using the actual ISO 1600 exposure, had the gradient/color still been present at that time.
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Basil Greber on July 22, 2012 at 2:36 PM
Thanks, Alex!
Registered on November 8, 2005, 219 Posts, 1340 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Metternich on July 22, 2012 at 7:12 PM
I think the darkness of this image really works well.
Registered on June 19, 2009, 276 Posts, 6240 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on July 22, 2012 at 8:43 PM
Very nice comp. The stars certainly add a lot to the this larger version. The darks feels a bit underexposed, but I guess it was nearly night. Still, it might be nice to have better separation between the foreground rocks and the water.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on July 22, 2012 at 9:10 PM
Lovely colors and stars. I'd like to see just a touch more detail in the foreground rock. I think it's neat how many more stars are seen on the right than on the left due to the brightness of the sky. Well done!
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by Kah Kit Yoong on July 22, 2012 at 9:13 PM
That's the best way to make use of a clear sky at Sparks!
Registered on September 27, 2006, 636 Posts, 10682 Comments
Comment posted by Danny Laureys on July 22, 2012 at 10:09 PM
Very nice, very well done, larger version is much better
Registered on January 5, 2008, 590 Posts, 1261 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on July 22, 2012 at 11:18 PM
Awesome twight scene beautifully captured. My only issue and it's a minor one, is I might try to bring a little more detail out of the rock in the LLC, but not much. The mood you've expressed is fantastic. Well done.
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on July 23, 2012 at 2:51 AM
Thanks for the input, everyone - I intentionally went dark on this one to emphasize the nearly-night feel of twilight, when your naked eye can only perceive the last subtle/soft light of the evening, which you see in the lower-right foreground rocks.
To all saying to bring out more detail in the FG, have you checked it out on black here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/schmalpal/7621221094/in/photostream/lightbox/? On NPN's bright background, I certainly think it looks too dark; but on my calibrated monitor and on a dark background, I see plenty of FG detail, even in the LLC, where there was zero direct light.. I'd certainly print it brighter, though. Perhaps it needs to be a bit brighter for web display as well, since not everyone will view it on black - I only made such judgments against CS6's darkest background.
Thanks again for the input!
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by David Edwards on July 23, 2012 at 5:38 AM
Beautiful twilight colors here Alex. I love the blue/purples. The stars look very nice, although quite a few seem not quite pin points (slightly blurred/elongated). The afterglow on the left creates a wonderful color combination in the image. I don't think the image needs the fg rocks imho. The awesomeness is the night sky and the reflections on the water.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 142 Posts, 2623 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Budliger on July 23, 2012 at 8:52 AM
Sweet, definitely have to see it on black to appreciate the full range of light and detail. Nice work.
Registered on June 11, 2006, 113 Posts, 2116 Comments
Comment posted by Alex Noriega on July 23, 2012 at 12:27 PM
David, they're all perfect pinpoints in the full file - there are just some that are so close together that they appear as longer ones in the small web version.
Registered on May 19, 2012, 80 Posts, 195 Comments
Comment posted by Peyton Hale on July 25, 2012 at 5:51 PM
Awesome capture Alex - great processing on this one.
Registered on December 9, 2011, 8 Posts, 43 Comments
Comments
21 commentsNick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
Morris, I believe the detail in the darker areas requires a dark background to really show - check it out here for 1024px on black: http://www.flickr.com/photos/schmalpal/7621221094/in/photostream/lightbox/
Very well accomplished.
I'm wondering - did you do any noise reduction on the sky here? It looks very, very clean (meaning - good!
The sky gradient is so clean because it's from the ISO 100 exposure. The stars are simply overlaid on that clean exposure from a separate ISO 1600 exposure taken an hour later at the exact same spot. That having been said, the D7000 does compare favorably to the 5D Mark II at high ISOs, and I probably could have gotten away with using the actual ISO 1600 exposure, had the gradient/color still been present at that time.
To all saying to bring out more detail in the FG, have you checked it out on black here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/schmalpal/7621221094/in/photostream/lightbox/? On NPN's bright background, I certainly think it looks too dark; but on my calibrated monitor and on a dark background, I see plenty of FG detail, even in the LLC, where there was zero direct light.. I'd certainly print it brighter, though. Perhaps it needs to be a bit brighter for web display as well, since not everyone will view it on black - I only made such judgments against CS6's darkest background.
Thanks again for the input!