Gallery: Photo ArtPosted May 13, 2012178 views3 comments
5DMK2.17-40L, f16@2.0, ISO 200, CPL, Hand held, up & down movement PSCS4. Shot in Tillamook Forest OR. Thanks for looking
Comments
3 comments
Comment posted by Ed Williams on May 13, 2012 at 2:19 AM
This belongs in photo art Danny. Interesting abstract and colors here. Fun technique. Nice job.
Registered on December 28, 2010, 636 Posts, 3499 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on May 13, 2012 at 1:06 PM
Hi Danny,
Love the colors and the seemingly random nature of this abstract. Works quite nicely for me.
I am going to move this to Photo Art though and I hope you understand. For a while now motion blurs have been placed in Photo Art even though you are correct that there are many abstracts that don't. the main difference is that the photographer made the motion happen (ie. camera shake, lens zoom, etc.) as opposed to nature doing the moving, ie. silky water, star trails, etc. It's also quite possible that many slip by because no one notice at the time and we moderators didn't catch it.... ;-) Hope that makes sense!
Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Caldwell on May 16, 2012 at 3:23 PM
Beautiful abstract Danny, I like the blur!
Registered on October 10, 2011, 62 Posts, 508 Comments
Comments
3 commentsLove the colors and the seemingly random nature of this abstract. Works quite nicely for me.
I am going to move this to Photo Art though and I hope you understand. For a while now motion blurs have been placed in Photo Art even though you are correct that there are many abstracts that don't. the main difference is that the photographer made the motion happen (ie. camera shake, lens zoom, etc.) as opposed to nature doing the moving, ie. silky water, star trails, etc. It's also quite possible that many slip by because no one notice at the time and we moderators didn't catch it.... ;-) Hope that makes sense!
Lon