Turquoise
by Eva McDermott
This image was taken a little after sunset on Inverness Beach, Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. It was a stormy evening so I was lucky to see any color at all but I knew to stick around since this beach rarely disappoints me with its moodiness. Just love this place.
I am planning to get back to my favorite place this coming October with both digital and film cameras in hand (or on tripod I should say). My Really Right Stuff BH-55LR ball head and TVC-33 Versa Series 3 Tripod showed up yesterday to handle the extra weight of my film camera. While the Manfrotto 055CXPRO3 Carbon Fiber Tripod - Q90 - 3 Section and RRS BH-40 worked well with my Canon 5DM2 system, it was not stable with the much heavier Pentax 67II camera and its shutter ricochet with Pentax mid range zooms. New adventures in film which I have done for 30 years before going digital.
BTW - Not only has Kodak taken my Kodachrome away but have now they also have taken my Ektachrome away. I think I just purchased the last 10 rolls from Adorama since B&H was out as was Amazon. Kodak will only offer negative film from now on until....? Fujichrome seems to be the only game in town for color transparencies (I don't like Agfa or Ilford (except for B&W). What next? Like stock as in Wall Street, watch film availability and when to sell.
Canon 40D taken in October 2008
Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L at 60mm
ISO200 1.6sec f/16
Singh Ray Grad Reverse ND 2 Stop
Thanks for having a look.
Edit: Changed the title to the one I used on my website.
Comments
24 commentsAs a side note on the film issue there are many others sharing in the sad ill health of the Kodak world. I too was a hard core Kodachrome shooter but moved to Fujichrome when Velvia hit the market. One item open for discussion is Kodak's long time production of E-6 chemicals and where that stands. That has an effect on ALL chrome's for processing.
Chris
Definitely a moody scene, here the softness in the waves helps the overall tone. Usually not a big fan of softness in water movement, but it does work well here. Unfortunate about the film deal, it's another way of expression to me and it browns me off that it's being taken away. I personally don't notice the difference, but it would be like taking away oil paints and only having acrylic. Having painted and used both can tell the difference. I've shot film but only in 35mm and I know it doesn't compare to format.
Paul
Yes, the Kodachrome days for me I remember well. I also did alot of aerial IR with Ektachrome...awhile back now. Still have my darkroom where I processed it all....mostly used for storage now.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
It does appear that Fuji is the only manufacturer committed to producing color transparency film for the near future and even they are slimming things down a bit, at least as sheet film goes. You might give Provia 100F a try once your Ektachrome is gone; has pretty decent latitude and no reciprocity issues.
Sandy
I think Nick said it well, your images always seem to bring me there. "Post Nuclear..." great title as it seems fitting with the glow on the horizon.
I might be tempted to exclude the sand for moody pano, but that's a personal choice and just an alternate comp at best.
Nice work with this one, love the colors and the overall processing. Wait, wait... I think I just noticed a ccw rotation? very slight if any; I didn't measure, but if you print you might want to double check.
Lon
Yes, I seriously lament the loss of E100G.
Ed
I am also missing the Kodak products, yet I was surprised by the results using Kodak Portra 160 with 4.5x6 and 6x9 (together with a Mamiya 645 and a Fuji rangefinder 690) - I think it is worth trying it.
Peter
Gary.
You have a good diagonal line in the FG where the water stops, and the red glow on the horizon
is a real plus.