I See Red
by Phillip Noll
Been playing around with some images trying out new techniques. Most of the leaves were red but a few were yellow so I changed them to red. Also applied some Orton dreaminess to it and various contrast adjustments. Not sure if I have gone too far to pass this off as a nature photo or if it should be considered photo art. Would love to hear your opinions.
Comments
9 commentsBe interesting to see what other folks say.
Cheers,
Carol
The effect to me is not overdone and still looks very pleasing to the eye.
The Q whether nature or art????
ART
First of all, this is a beautiful image. I think the processing is outstanding and I think this comes real close to coming off as quite natural. Although we've seen enough images here and elsewhere that unfortunately taint our responses sometimes. In other words, I would have guessed a slight application of some technique, like Orton, but this certainly is right on the edge of believable. But no matter, it's still a beautiful and well crafted image.
As to the other part of your question. Had you made no disclosures and posted this in Landscape I don't think it would have crossed my mind to move it(can't speak for the other mods of course.) However, by disclosing that you altered the image (changing color) applied some techniques like Orton, that might force the hand. So in the end I'm glad you posted here so I didn't have to make that decision. And personally, I appreciate the disclosure especially on a nature site like NPN. I love the artistry and imagery but believe that there should be some disclosure IF you're presenting something as a straight nature photograph. If you're posting it as Photo Art on DevianArt or somewhere else, no, you should have to disclose. Hope that makes sense.
Lon