Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
High Key Bear
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

High Key Bear

by Dottie Short

Gallery: WildlifePosted January 8, 2012258 views7 comments
I would like to tell you that I planned to photograph this bear and present it as a 'High Key' image, but, in reality I probably just messed up. I perceived the idea some months ago to edit this Alaskan Coastal Brown Bear and declare it 'High Key'. After reading several comments on the NPN Forum discussion today about this concept, I decided to be brave and post my image. It's different, but I like it. I would love to hear other's comments too.

7D, 500mm F/4L, F/6.3 1/800 -0.33, ISO 400
Subject Distance 25.2 m
PP CS5, Nik, OnOne

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Eirini Pajak on January 8, 2012 at 1:43 PM
I think this is an awesome image of a bear! It has a lot of energy & the lighting contributes a lot. The expression & the grass hanging out of his mouth is great!
Registered on December 13, 2011, 216 Posts, 1671 Comments
Comment posted by Ashley Vincent on January 8, 2012 at 11:09 PM
I like this capture very much too Dottie, "High Key" perhaps, "High Impact" definitely! Wishing you a wonderful year ahead :^)
Registered on March 1, 2011, 154 Posts, 2083 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on January 9, 2012 at 9:22 AM
Hi Dottie,

Definitely some impact with this shot! The dead-on stare is intense and eye-catching. I suspect some might argue that a vertical capture may have been a better choice (and that in doing so you could have "saved" the lower legs), I'm fine with the tight horizontal crop here.

On the high-key approach: Hmmm...always hard to say if it's the "right" approach without seeing other options. I have to admit that some of what appear to be "blown" highlights here distracted me a little and think those highlights MIGHT be recoverable with a different processing approach (but I do NOT know this for a fact). I'm tending to think my personal preference would be in selectively pulling back the exposure on this shot and thus go with more colour (less bleached out), But that's just me!

Cheers...thanks for sharing this eye-catcher!

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Roman Kurywczak on January 9, 2012 at 11:18 AM
Hey Dottie,
I applaud your different take on this but like Brad, I may have preferred a vert to keep the legs. That being said.....it does grab your attention......so did you try even going more high key with the processing? Could be interesting and thanks for sharing the idea with all of us!
Registered on November 20, 2009, 56 Posts, 748 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on January 9, 2012 at 1:12 PM
Cool image Dottie! :cool: Not really high-key IMO though, but the exposure works for me as is. I too would have preferred a vertical, or alternatively experiment with a tighter crop.
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Dottie Short on January 9, 2012 at 2:10 PM
I was shooting with my 500mm lens at 25 meters, and did not capture the bear's legs and paws in the frame. I slightly cropped the image to remove the negative space to the left of the bear. I agree a portrait view would have been better, but that was not to be. Thanks for looking and commenting.
Registered on April 12, 2010, 61 Posts, 375 Comments
Comment posted by Lon Sharp on January 15, 2012 at 2:21 PM
I really like how this emphasizes his massive bulk. Vertical format would have been a good choice, too.
Registered on December 9, 2007, 258 Posts, 9892 Comments