Gallery: FloraPosted November 3, 201121,415 views20 comments
Been busy last couple of weeks but able to get to the flower market yesterday to look for subjects for xray.
Cyclamen Xray on GE Mammo 32kV 16mA. Cs5 Viveza and Photo toning filter.
Comments
20 comments
Comment posted by Fabio Giarrizzo on November 3, 2011 at 11:21 AM
My woods are full of these flowers right now, but they appear a little different than this- kidding aside, the result of your tecnique is fantastic, and actually I'm very curious about the making of these very interesting images- My congrats, Fabio
Registered on December 3, 2010, 90 Posts, 1614 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on November 3, 2011 at 11:25 AM
Wow that's awesome Gary. These just keep getting better. Very nice work.
My only nit that has nothing to do with the actual image is that the size of your copyright mark is a little distracting but I realize it would most likely not be present on a print.
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Fach on November 3, 2011 at 11:28 AM
Gary: Great subjects for the x-ray. I think I would like this better without the buds. I think they compete with the larger blooms and don't really add much IMO. The sweep of the main flowers across the frame is compelling and stands on its own. >=))>
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1805 Posts, 26981 Comments
Comment posted by Charlie Baugh on November 3, 2011 at 12:51 PM
Wonderful as are all these xray images. I especially love the way the less dense petal detail is brought out.
Registered on April 18, 2011, 329 Posts, 1985 Comments
Comment posted by Derek Yow on November 3, 2011 at 1:31 PM
Very cool Gary! I like the arrangement and the unopened blossoms at the bottom.
Top notch as usual!
Registered on May 18, 2010, 26 Posts, 655 Comments
Comment posted by Todd Bielby on November 3, 2011 at 1:46 PM
What can I say these x-ray shots are beautiful. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on March 10, 2011, 169 Posts, 392 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Grabski on November 3, 2011 at 2:02 PM
Oh yes, it's awesome.
Registered on April 29, 2011, 122 Posts, 431 Comments
Comment posted by Tonia Graves on November 3, 2011 at 4:12 PM
Gary, I have been admiring your work for awhile now and just recently became a member of NPN. I love the delicate textures that the mammo machine is able to capture. I also think you do a great job of positioning the flowers. Love to see this kind of work!
Registered on October 29, 2011, 92 Posts, 1035 Comments
Comment posted by Verdon on November 3, 2011 at 4:40 PM
what a beauty, do you wanna share "know how"?! thnx for sharing great and interesting shot!!!
Registered on June 10, 2011, 147 Posts, 1444 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Graham on November 3, 2011 at 10:49 PM
Beautiful, Gary. I agree that the lower buds don't add much. How do you keep the clean edges to the petals when processing?
Registered on August 22, 2006, 842 Posts, 2824 Comments
Comment posted by Nathan Buck on November 4, 2011 at 2:27 AM
Awesome Gary, just wonderful. A very stunning photo.
Nathan
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1101 Posts, 13589 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Yeoh on November 4, 2011 at 5:16 AM
Thanks everyone for your comments.
Bill and Bob:
I actually took the Xray of the whole plant including the pot but the lower part of the image was just too cluttered and so I ended cropping them out. This is how the buds ended in the image as shown. I agree that the buds are bit of a distraction especially the lowest one. Therefore I erased the lowest bud and I think the overall image is now stronger with a 'v' shape alignment. I did experiment with moving the lower bud up to fill the gap in the lower line but I like it more without. This is applying the 'less is more' principle in Ikebana. Removing the bud also separate the flowers into two groupings of 5 and 8 with G5 mostly facing left and G8 facing the other way creating a little tension in composition.
Verdon:
The process making radiograph is actually quite straight forward. It is a bit like doing a scan where you place the subject on the glass surface. The difference is the Xray image is an incident image whereas scan images are reflected light images similar to camera images. I think the biggest challenge with radiography is having access to the equipment. Once the image is made, the raw DICOM file can be loaded onto PS and post process as any digital image. I happy to answer any specific questions so feel free to email me.
Bob and Charlie:
The trick to getting the petal edge defined is to do different exposures and select the one with the best noise/signal ratio and then make the final adjustments with the shadow/highlights adjustment in PS.
Bruce:
No distracting copyright mark on the re-post.
Registered on September 1, 2009, 588 Posts, 8184 Comments
Comment posted by Miro Susta on November 4, 2011 at 6:20 AM
Another very nice art creation. Very well done Gary..
Registered on August 18, 2006, 719 Posts, 3736 Comments
Comment posted by scott lanz on November 4, 2011 at 7:19 AM
Great addition to this collection. I agree that a version w/o the competing buds may work even better.
Registered on November 14, 2003, 840 Posts, 12902 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on November 4, 2011 at 9:23 AM
I like the delicacy in this. The petals almost look like tutus. Another excellent effort, and the arrangement works great.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Mark Seaver on November 4, 2011 at 11:51 AM
More veiled dancers. Another spectacular xray image.
Registered on January 23, 2011, 1103 Posts, 17270 Comments
Comment posted by David Taylor on November 4, 2011 at 3:24 PM
Two more great images. Honours even, IMHO.
Registered on April 24, 2006, 101 Posts, 837 Comments
Comment posted by Giuseppe Guadagno on November 4, 2011 at 7:04 PM
Gary, this technique in your hands brings beautiful results. This photo is very impressive, creative and stirs the imagination. Excellent.
Take care.
Registered on February 3, 2007, 827 Posts, 5052 Comments
Comment posted by Albert Darmo on November 4, 2011 at 10:51 PM
Hi Gary A fascinating subject, marvelously composed
Albert Darmo
Registered on November 25, 2008, 1386 Posts, 11978 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on November 5, 2011 at 12:58 PM
Good stuff, Gary!
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comments
20 commentsMy only nit that has nothing to do with the actual image is that the size of your copyright mark is a little distracting but I realize it would most likely not be present on a print.
Top notch as usual!
Nathan
Bill and Bob:
I actually took the Xray of the whole plant including the pot but the lower part of the image was just too cluttered and so I ended cropping them out. This is how the buds ended in the image as shown. I agree that the buds are bit of a distraction especially the lowest one. Therefore I erased the lowest bud and I think the overall image is now stronger with a 'v' shape alignment. I did experiment with moving the lower bud up to fill the gap in the lower line but I like it more without. This is applying the 'less is more' principle in Ikebana. Removing the bud also separate the flowers into two groupings of 5 and 8 with G5 mostly facing left and G8 facing the other way creating a little tension in composition.
Verdon:
The process making radiograph is actually quite straight forward. It is a bit like doing a scan where you place the subject on the glass surface. The difference is the Xray image is an incident image whereas scan images are reflected light images similar to camera images. I think the biggest challenge with radiography is having access to the equipment. Once the image is made, the raw DICOM file can be loaded onto PS and post process as any digital image. I happy to answer any specific questions so feel free to email me.
Bob and Charlie:
The trick to getting the petal edge defined is to do different exposures and select the one with the best noise/signal ratio and then make the final adjustments with the shadow/highlights adjustment in PS.
Bruce:
No distracting copyright mark on the re-post.
Take care.
Albert Darmo