Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Red kite
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Red kite

by Paul Whippey

Gallery: AvianPosted October 15, 2011102 views11 comments
Red Kite, taken with a Canon 7D and EF300mm f/4L. Aperture priority mode, f/7.1, 1/3200 sec, ISO400. Imported with ACR, processed and sharpened in Photoshop CS5: curves, brightness, contrast, cropped to 4x3 format. Noise reduction with Nik Dfine.

My first attempt at photographing these birds, hopefully I did it justice! :wink:

Thanks for the comments so far, C's and C's appreciated as always.

Thanks,

Paul.

Comments

11 comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on October 15, 2011 at 4:28 PM
Excellent comp, good eye contact, flight pose and detail. There is a funky green cast under the left wing that probably shouldn't be there. Also, the sky has an aqua cast. Both minor details, easily corrected.
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Whippey on October 15, 2011 at 7:09 PM
Thanks Phil, I'll pay more attention to the colour casts in future. The Kites were over a grass meadow, so that would explain the greenish cast.

Thanks,

Paul.
Registered on September 16, 2011, 16 Posts, 69 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Ellard on October 16, 2011 at 3:08 AM
i think you did, fantastic comp and detail. :toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on December 17, 2010, 60 Posts, 634 Comments
Comment posted by keith mitchell on October 16, 2011 at 11:54 AM
Paul i can see Phils cast but that apart it's a good image.

Keith.
Registered on July 12, 2008, 127 Posts, 1735 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Mason on October 16, 2011 at 12:26 PM
Stunning! Nice to see some cloud detail. I see the cast too. There's a recent debate about such casts on the main site here: http://www.naturephotographers.net/imagecritique/bbs.cgi?a=vm&mr=66828&CGISESSID=5d9f0d0fc9ac33bd42b0fb92dfbbd730&u=29215

Sorry - can't get the link to work for some reason, but it's under "all topics" posted by Barbara Graham
Registered on December 14, 2005, 399 Posts, 2305 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Whippey on October 16, 2011 at 2:31 PM
Thanks for the positive comments everybody. Thanks for the link Ian, I've had a read and tried some of the techniques. I found it difficult to adjust the whole image, so I reprocessed from the raw file again and used a layer mask on the green tinted right under wing, parts of the throat and the left tail feathers. I then desaturated the greens and yellows in those parts only and its removed the cast.
Registered on September 16, 2011, 16 Posts, 69 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Whippey on October 16, 2011 at 4:04 PM
Whoops! Maybe its worth attaching the photo eh? D'oh! Still not sure of the sky though.
Registered on September 16, 2011, 16 Posts, 69 Comments
Comment posted by John Robinson on October 16, 2011 at 4:21 PM
Paul
This business about colour casts can drive you mad ! I have had loads of comments on my pics but I am slightly colour blind so can,t see most of them ! After all - does it matter that much !!
AS I have said before - evening and morning light produces a colour cast any way !!
I personally think your first pic is the best . The second has lost some shadow detail anyway. I' drather have a pic with a "cast " as theycall it than no cast at all or a heavily manipulated picture. Lets face it - all digital photography is fake really.
JohnR
Registered on March 2, 2008, 535 Posts, 2453 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Whippey on October 16, 2011 at 4:31 PM
Thanks John, I think I've gone mad already!! :wink:
Registered on September 16, 2011, 16 Posts, 69 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Shaw on October 17, 2011 at 10:34 AM
Another vote for the first version. Nice sharp eye and good wing position. Have you applied the noise reduction to the whole image, or just the sky? My reason for asking is because the tail looks a bit "smoothed".
Registered on July 25, 2005, 26 Posts, 110 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Whippey on October 17, 2011 at 3:35 PM
Thanks Phil. I double checked the processed image and yes, I did apply the NR to the bird and not the background! The behaviour of Dfine is different to Neatimage or CS5's own noise reduction plugins. It creates a new layer after application, so I should have used a non-inverted mask instead of the inverted one used for sharpening :rolleyes:
Registered on September 16, 2011, 16 Posts, 69 Comments