Gallery: Regional: UKNPPosted June 25, 2011232 views11 comments
Taken on one of my recent trips - actually out looking for something else !
Thanks for all your comments on my other images,
Comments
11 comments
Comment posted by Phil Ellard on June 25, 2011 at 12:42 PM
great detail and nice with the captured flies, unsure about the central comp though
Registered on December 17, 2010, 60 Posts, 634 Comments
Comment posted by Craig Jones on June 25, 2011 at 1:52 PM
Hi Joanna, the images you have posted lately most have been this square crop which for me does not do the images justice. Try to use your focus spot which you see through your viewfinder after half-pressing the shutter button, it will show up as a red square, you then move this spot with your wheel with your finger/thumb as you look through the viewfinder on your make of camera. This will allow you to compose your images, giving space in front of the subject, getting away from these square crops. Also here with the pixels and noise in the back ground it would seem you have cropped really big which takes detail away from your camera, no point in buying an expensive camera with a great pixel rate if you crop big as this takes that pixel count down to the level of an older make of camera. When you see a subject, see the image first, then compose, try to use AV mode, controlling the depth of field within your subject, use what natural light you have, use fieldcraft to try and get closer to wildlife instead of cropping. Your images are sharp but you need to compose better in camera, in turn this will transform your images. I hope that advice helps which added to your passion for wildlife will make for an all round improvement within your own work
Registered on January 31, 2009, 67 Posts, 316 Comments
Comment posted by Joanna Davies on June 25, 2011 at 2:31 PM
Techs - f5.6, ISO640, 1/2000 300mm lens.
Registered on May 14, 2011, 21 Posts, 43 Comments
Comment posted by Phil Ellard on June 25, 2011 at 2:38 PM
that was a big crop, i had no idea it was that big so fair play in keeping all that detail. I prefer the uncropped version it just seems more natural.
Registered on December 17, 2010, 60 Posts, 634 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Cole on June 25, 2011 at 3:15 PM
that is one heck of a crop Joanna. That will be a major cause of the noise, that and the sharpening too (it's best to selectively sharpen rather than to sharpen the whole image). I would personally avoid cropping to that extent but if you do I would leave more space on the RHS, as others have pointed out above.
Matt
Registered on February 18, 2008, 17 Posts, 267 Comments
Comment posted by Joanna Davies on June 25, 2011 at 3:35 PM
thanks Matt,
no, i agree the crop is too tight (i always seem to crop too tight) plenty of space in the composition when taken, just get carried away in the editing!
Registered on May 14, 2011, 21 Posts, 43 Comments
Comment posted by John Robinson on June 25, 2011 at 6:12 PM
I agree with some of the points raised above. You certainly did well to get 6 foot from a wheatear feeding young in the nest ! I find a hide at three times that distance can be a bit dodgy. ( maybe its black country birds ! )
Cheers
johnR
Registered on March 2, 2008, 535 Posts, 2453 Comments
Comment posted by Simon Litten on June 26, 2011 at 9:38 AM
I think Craigs advice is spot-on. Getting a good composition in camera is key - it doesn't matter if the subject is small in frame. My belief is that if you're cropping a shot then you took the wrong shot to begin with. I hate it when I have to crop one of my shots as it means I failed in the field. It also means after having spent a fortune on a camera with a good sensor I'm having to chuck away a lot of the pixels that I've paid for! In my opinion the crop tool is there to perfect a composition - not create one.
The first image, whilst it looks good as posted, is more of a testimony to the quality of your camera/lens set-up than your skill as a photographer - afterall, it's only about 20% of the shot you actually took. The second shot - which I think is still cropped judging by the aspect ratio - is much better as it includes the birds habitat and is a more honest account of your photography.
Getting within six feet of a wheatear is achievement enough - no need to crop as if you were toe-to-toe with it
Simon
Registered on June 22, 2006, 24 Posts, 275 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Haskell on June 26, 2011 at 11:01 AM
Hi Jo
I wondered about the noise in the background until I saw the original shot that you included below. I think in the forum rules there is a section about detailing the crop used within the photograph that you post so that others can assess what you've taken and provide meaningful advice. There are a number of us on the forum that do this already otherwise I feel your misrepresenting the photograph to others.
Ditto Simon and Craigs comments.
I prefer the second post showing the Wheatear in the environment, although it could do with about 10-15% crop down to the top of the green.
Ian
Registered on October 30, 2008, 24 Posts, 673 Comments
Comment posted by Neil Burton on June 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM
Nice, works well with the insects.
Registered on September 16, 2010, 26 Posts, 461 Comments
Comment posted by Austin Thomas on June 27, 2011 at 7:37 AM
There is some good advice already given on this one Joanna.
I think you have done incredibly well to pull so much detail from the original image given the crop.
Cheers
Austin
Registered on March 7, 2008, 45 Posts, 207 Comments
Comments
11 commentsTechs - f5.6, ISO640, 1/2000 300mm lens.
Matt
no, i agree the crop is too tight (i always seem to crop too tight) plenty of space in the composition when taken, just get carried away in the editing!
Cheers
johnR
The first image, whilst it looks good as posted, is more of a testimony to the quality of your camera/lens set-up than your skill as a photographer - afterall, it's only about 20% of the shot you actually took. The second shot - which I think is still cropped judging by the aspect ratio - is much better as it includes the birds habitat and is a more honest account of your photography.
Getting within six feet of a wheatear is achievement enough - no need to crop as if you were toe-to-toe with it
Simon
I wondered about the noise in the background until I saw the original shot that you included below. I think in the forum rules there is a section about detailing the crop used within the photograph that you post so that others can assess what you've taken and provide meaningful advice. There are a number of us on the forum that do this already otherwise I feel your misrepresenting the photograph to others.
Ditto Simon and Craigs comments.
I prefer the second post showing the Wheatear in the environment, although it could do with about 10-15% crop down to the top of the green.
Ian
I think you have done incredibly well to pull so much detail from the original image given the crop.
Cheers
Austin