Ruckel Creek, take 2
by Daniel Rappaport
On my first from this spot I did everything to narrow my presentation and simplify. This is perhaps over the top too much stuff, but I love it.
Canon 5D Mk2, 24-105mm 4L at 24mm
Polarizer
iso 320, f16, composite for DOF and shadow detail, 0.5sec to 2sec.
Since this is about detail, the larger version is better.
Comments
13 commentsGary.
Beautiful intimate scene.
Never get tired of seeing shots from these places...amazing greens.
Even though I failed to comment on your previous take from here, I think this image is stronger even though I think they come across quite a bit differently. The previous is darker (mood as well as brightness,) more compact, where as this image here seems to flow freely, it's more open - and for that I really like this one. This is beautifully composed and the greens are vibrant, as they should be here (and not over the top IMO.) The only observation I have is that the color balance in the water changes from the lower teir through to the middle in the water specifically. The middle portion has a bit of a green tint to it (not surprising given the surroundings) which is different than a more neutral cast in the lower section of the water. There is also a bit of green fringing in the lower submerged rock just where the water turns white, falling off the rock.
Very minor, but if you plan on printing this - and you should!, you might consider shaving off a very little bit from the left to remove the little cascade of white on the frames edge, in the lower half, left side edge. No biggie, but either I want to see all of that little cascade, or none.
I'm only getting real nitpicky here because I think this is a beautiful image and worth the extra little tweaks for an awesome print.
Lon