Sacred Chamber
I recently finished my 17 day solo SW shoot (with two photo tours interjected) and a huge highlight of my trip was getting to spend 3 full days (no hurry) alone in this very remote Arizona canyon seeking an original take on the slot canyon motif. Once I found this composition (my favorite) I spent the ENTIRE next day sitting here waiting for the absolute best moment of light. It is amazing to me how bland the canyons can look (early in the morning and really late afternoon) and then hours later they can go up like a flame with awesome reflected glow, and then fade away in just minutes (or sometimes even seconds). Wind from a very windy day (the reason I chose to shoot in the canyon these particular days) kept a lot of dust in the air creating a somewhat faint (compared to Antelope Canyon) light beam. I wanted the darks to be a little darker than my usual here with punchy contrast so I purposely allowed a minimum of dark pixels to plug (a sin to some

).
Technical info:
This is a 15 shot DOF / Focus bracket, as well as exposure bracketed + and - 2 stops (45 total shots). The blend came out AWESOME in PS (using the "Auto Align" and "Auto Blend" commands, found in CS4 and CS5, which automatically mask out the softer pixels in a layer stack) and since I used the sharpest f/stop (5.6) with a very high quality prime lens I should be able to produce a huge gallery print with great detail (I'm anticipating 73.5" x 49")!
Canon 5D Mark 2
Canon 14mmL2
f/5.6
100 ISO
Thanks for looking!
Comments
60 commentsYes, you have a sharp eye Marc. The beam is REAL. I did not want the beam to get that hard edge look which you see in antelope a lot (which it did not have to the eye) so I purposely controlled contrast there (lessoned it) to keep the look more subdued/diffused.
I'm currently processing a whole bunch of Antelope shots (upper and lower) for a clients gallery and you see both types of beams in these shots. Sometimes razor sharp edge and at other times much more diffused. This one was more diffused to the eye (even just a little more faint than you see here) so I went for that...
The technical "feat" was really not that hard (I had all day to think about it). I just used "Live View" 10X to focus on the very closest wall, then shot the 3 bracket shots (+ and - 2 stops) then moved the lens focus manually a very small amount toward the infinity line, let the camera stabilize (no camera shake) then shot another 3 bracketed shots and repeated... In PS it is pretty darn easy (so far) to get the auto command to blend them (when the scene is totally static like here). And again, if it was not for producing very large fine art gallery prints, I might not go to the trouble...
Looking at your 2nd photo here, brings one thing to mind " 127hrs"
The caked mud is actually a blessing in this canyon. I have been here several times over a couple years and there was always a huge (and ugly) rock pile here (caused by flash floods) so to get anything but a huge piles of rocks is great!. You can never get that simple sand type of foreground here.
As far as the light beam, as I said in my previous reply, it was a faint diffused beam so I'm cool with it being represented closely like it was rather than as you see them more (much more sharp) often from Antelope Canyon shots.
Can't wait to see the video when you get it edited!
aF
Just a personal observation: I learned a long time ago that when it comes to technical details and good photography, more is often less and can take away from the romance and mystery of the image itself.
"I have always tried to hide my efforts and wished my works to have the light joyousness of springtime which never lets anyone suspect the labors it has cost me." --Henri Matisse
Guy
I've seen a lot of slot canyon photos and this is new. Congratulations for the idea and the flawless execution.
I want to see that print!
I like the thought of just letting the art speak for itself. But I also like the explanation of how you were able to achieve this result. It's good to know you can't just go pull of something like this with just a single exposure.
Chris
Thanks Guy. I very much appreciate your comments and observation. I also very much agree, mainly with the market (print market). Yet on this forum I get a lot of positive feedback (often through PM's and emails) from people thanking me for the technicals of either how an image was shot or what it took to get the image, so I have felt a tendency to share that to help with some peoples educational process. I think it can be a double edge sword for sure and sometimes some can think I might be bragging or whatever but that is not my motive. I also have come to have a much deeper appreciation for many images once I have heard the story behind them (as a recent example Marc's Aurora shot!) and I think that has influenced my tendency on a photographers forum to share the story behind an image. I think a lot of folks (lurkers included) come here not only to appreciate but also to learn. At least for myself, hearing what it took to get an image has helped me a lot to know what it takes to go out myself and get one, if that makes sense? Yet having said all that, I do agree with the flip side benefit of throwing out an image and not saying anything so that others can interpret it with no influence. I will consider that more.
Chris: I really have a VERY hard time sitting still, so waiting is a very, very difficult discipline for me! I used to read about Michael Fatali waiting all day in a canyon (sometimes more than one day) just watching the light and was greatly inspired to figure out what that meant. I think too many show up, pull out there DSLR's and shoot rapid fire and then leave (someone from Oregon showed up at one very remote location I was at shot for 15 minutes and left, and right after they left I saw the most awesome sunset in a very long while). I feel, if I have paid such a price to get to such an amazing location and there may be a chance that I will never be there again, and if I am serious about a composition and think it has real value... then I think it is a true and maybe profound privilege to be where I am and I should maybe slow down, take it in and try to go for as much excellence as I can. So, to answer your question (in a round about way) after I set up exactly the way I want, I then sit there for quite a while until I feel I really can see the scene and get familiar with it, then when I know the light is not even close to what it needs to be, I might dart off (but not a long way off) and look around different areas of the canyon, coming back over and over (at fairly short intervals so I don't miss anything). Sometimes I sing out loud. Often I talk to myself (but I don't reply
Ben, thank you very much. It won't be for a while. I'm in NO HURRY about that anymore (especially after the huge losses I took coming to Vegas). You'll prob have yours before mine!
I like that your bringing new comps to this landscape that I haven't yet seen.
Great work
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, WI
OK--i just went back and read the comments--a couple other notes:
I agree with Marc, and i think darker will help the beam stand out better.
I also agree with you. There's room for romance, and theres room for learning--i think you've covered both with this shot and post.
colors are marvelous. This is a unique slot composition.
Thank you very much for your feedback, it is always excellent and appreciated.
Got a question though... are you saying darker blacks in the image globally? If so, is your monitor calibrated? I pushed the blacks here even a little too much for some, plugging them a tad to get a darker feel. So if that is what you are suggesting I would resist that.
But if you are simply talking about the light beam and letting it have sharper edge definition (which Marc was addressing) I see what you are talking about. I think it would certainly look good that way (maybe better for some) but to be at least somewhat true to the scene the beam was less contrasty and pronounced than you see here so during processing I erased out some of that extra pop...
As for the discussion on posting your processing technique, I for one really appreciate it. I am trying to improve my knowledge of Photoshop and knowing how some of the really stunning images are processed helps me with ideas and understanding. So thanks :)
Next time you are in Portland let me know and I will buy you a beer for the free tips.
I have two, one week photo tours up there. One in the Beginning of June and another the beginning of Sept. Maybe a time around then would work out? Aside from the tours I'll be crisscrossing the state for additional weeks scouting out (and shooting) all the pearl areas can find. I'd love that beer!
So if you are around after the 10th, pick the brewery that your exile for the Pacific Northwest has made you long for the most.
Congrats on the WP!
Sandy
Congrats,
Christian.