Dogwood Bloom + Repost
by Tony Colvin
This is my first post in Flora but I've always enjoyed looking at the beautiful work here. I took this image of a dogwood flower a couple of weeks ago, but I seem to like the looks of these leaves more than the flower.
I used a Canon 40D with a 28-105mm set on 105mm at f6.3 on a tripod.
Comments
10 commentsI didn't use any filters, just unsharp mask. You're right that the blue sky looks weird. I can crop it some, but I'm not good enough with PS to remove the 2 big leaves on the right. I think I'll try a more suitable lens and see if I can take another photo of this flower, if it's still there.
Thanks again.
I agree - the leaves create more interest to me than the bloom on the original post. The flower is much more prominent in your repost. There is still a lot of interest in the leaves with the back-lighting and excellent detail. You may want to try a shot just focusing on the detail of the leaves (I suggest a single leaf covering the entire frame if you have a macro lens). My suggestion for the flower would be a tighter crop and maybe a bit more directly at the face of the flower.
I like the leaves and the bloom a lot. I think the repost is a much stronger image. I think the oddness in the image (the bright blue and the filterish HDR look is just from the back lighting. It's sort of natural HDR. With the exception of the overly bright sky, I like the effect.
Welcome to the gallery. This is a very interesting post, at least for my tastes. I hope to see more of your images here. I'd also be very interested in seeing any more images you do of this subject. I think dogwood is hard to shoot.
pat
Bob