Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Curious Warbler w/REPOST
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Curious Warbler w/REPOST

by Cheryl Molennor

Gallery: AvianPosted March 18, 2011177 views15 comments
I am practicing my fill flash technique and I find I am so pleased with using it verses not using it when it comes to the little birds. You just can't always gaurantee great lighting conditions with them and I also find I can shoot later in the day without the effects of the harsh lighting.
Canon 7D 300 mm 2.8 L w/1.4X
ISO 400 1/250 @ f7.1
fill flash
cropped about 20 % off

Comments

15 comments
Comment posted by Mauro Pasquero on March 18, 2011 at 2:29 PM
Very nice pose, Cheryl. The fill flash is quite evident, in particular on the tree trunk, but pleasing enough. I love the colors and the details of the body of the bird.
Mauro
Registered on January 21, 2010, 650 Posts, 2500 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on March 18, 2011 at 3:46 PM
Thank you Mauro. So do I fix the problem with flash exposure comp?
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on March 18, 2011 at 4:46 PM
Overall I like this shot Cheryl. A very nice comp a pleasing BG. I do not use flash, so I can't help you very much with your question. However, you might try turning down the output of the flash unit a bit to give a softer more natural look to the images with flash.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on March 18, 2011 at 4:58 PM
Hi Cheryl,
I like the nuthatch like pose and your comp here. I agree with Mauro that it looks a little overflashed. What you need to do is use negative flash exposure comp. I usually use between -1.0 and -2.0 but experiment with your gear and see what seems to work best with it. My last couple of newsletters on my website have addressed just this issue (how much negative flash exposure comp to use when using fill flash). One of them can be accessed at http://www.trogontours.net/november2010 and the other at http://www.trogontours.net/january2011
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on March 18, 2011 at 9:17 PM
I agree about dialing back the fill flash a bit, but even with to much here it is a neat shot of this Yellow-throated Warbler.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on March 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM
Thanks guys. I will practice and Thanks Nate I will look that up
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on March 18, 2011 at 10:19 PM
I took this image back to the camera raw and started over. I softened the contrast. Is it any better? Looking at other flash shots that I did a flash - exp. comp they are defiantely better. I really like this pose so I hope the image is now more appealing? Thanks and Thanks Nate that article was very helpful... great stuff thanks for sharing it with us all. :wavey:
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on March 19, 2011 at 12:24 AM
I think the repost does look better and it's a great pose :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Ashley Vincent on March 19, 2011 at 4:45 AM
Very appealing image Cheryl, especially the colours and wonderful pose :^)

Still have a way to go before I begin learning how to make the most of my flash, but shots like this give me further encouragement as to the results that can be achieved.

Kind regards,

Ashley
Registered on March 1, 2011, 154 Posts, 2083 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on March 19, 2011 at 7:37 AM
:smile:
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on March 19, 2011 at 8:16 AM
I don't use flash and know virtually nothing about it but I like the shot a lot Cheryl. Wonderful pose and detail.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Gary Marquart on March 19, 2011 at 8:26 PM
Nice shot Cheryl, the repost looks very good to me. :toast:
Registered on October 24, 2009, 126 Posts, 799 Comments
Comment posted by S Govindarajan on March 19, 2011 at 10:33 PM
Very nice use of the flash on the repost, Chery. I always have difficulty with using mine.

The image itself is very well composed. Great pose and comp - think there are some nuthatch genes in this warbler. :toast:
Registered on April 19, 2008, 115 Posts, 1921 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on March 19, 2011 at 11:03 PM
Sweet, Cheryl. The flash worked well. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on March 20, 2011 at 11:55 AM
Although I like both images, I do prefer the repost, Cheryl. Perhaps the absence of shadow and uniformity of illumination is what reveals the flash for both. Adjustment of flash power is a good idea. Appropriate post-processing can help too. The background is fine in both of your images. I routinely equip my camera with a flash. However, I only use it as a last resort: darkness that exceeds the iso capability of my 1D Mark IV; the need for a catchlight (I see a tiny one in your image); to overcome annoying shadows; to help freeze motion or show iridescence (e.g. hummingbirds). The way a flash often disturbs the bird is a major disadvantage of flash for me. I sometimes use a better beamer to improve reach of the flash. However, I've missed some good close shots because the beamer was aimed for a longer distance. :toast:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments