Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Kingfisher Perch Battle
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Kingfisher Perch Battle

by Peter Conway

Gallery: AvianPosted November 25, 2010224 views15 comments
Mark IV, 400mm, ISO 2500, f/8, 1/1328th Natural Light

Taken this summer. After the first series that I posted I was trying for the best combination of ISO setting, shutter speeds, and aperture to better capture perch battle behavior. Its hard to get enough depth of field coupled with a high enough shutter speed. Here I pushed the ISO to help, and I think the quality is reasonable.

I developed this from the RAW file today and although I had done so previously I am fairly certain I never posted it. In any case I prefer the processing from my first attempt.

Comments always appreciated.

Peter

Comments

15 comments
Comment posted by Eric Diller on November 25, 2010 at 7:24 PM
Nice action shot! Love that mouth wide open.
Registered on October 2, 2009, 69 Posts, 434 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on November 25, 2010 at 7:33 PM
Interesting action, but for my taste the quality just isn't there even at this small web size. That said, I'm amazed that such ISO values are even possible and I'd use it if it was the only option to document something rare.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Conway on November 25, 2010 at 7:57 PM
Richard,

I agree with your assessment.

I think the Mark IV is superb up through ISO 800. After that there is a noticeable drop off in quality and naturally it drops off at an increasing rate. 2500 will not yield superb results but it can at times give the best result from a palette of poor options. :smile:

I posted this as an example of what it does and doesn't do. Hopefully its interesting.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 347 Posts, 3913 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on November 25, 2010 at 8:14 PM
I also agree that ISO settings over a certain value on the Mk IV are not good for high IQ results. What percent of FF is this shot? This is one example where posting the crop size would help people assess what is happening with the camera. If this is FF then for sure that setting is not going to work for high IQ, but if this is 40% of FF then that has to be taken into account. I have just started "testing" my Mk. IV and I have found that if you shoot FF or close to it ISO 1250 is still pretty nice. Some BG NR is needed on dark BG areas, but so far I have found that the higher ISO performance of the Mk. IV far surpasses the 7D I was using. But it should given what it costs vs the 7D.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Conway on November 25, 2010 at 8:38 PM
Ron, You make a great point. This is probably 75% of FF.

Peter
Registered on June 25, 2007, 347 Posts, 3913 Comments
Comment posted by KC Choo on November 26, 2010 at 6:25 AM
Nice action, and I think this is very acceptable. Also, I feel the Mk IV is good to ISO1600 or thereabouts. My default Mk IV ISO is 800, and rarely do I go below that.
Registered on November 15, 2004, 519 Posts, 8278 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on November 26, 2010 at 7:58 AM
Photo techs aside, this is an interesting behavior shot. I would feel lucky to get a decent photo of even one kingfisher, let alone 2 interacting. Did spark and interesting discussion. Thanks for sharing.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Saunders on November 26, 2010 at 10:07 AM
Wonderful action here Pete !
Registered on February 6, 2008, 321 Posts, 3035 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Conway on November 26, 2010 at 10:16 AM
KC said "Also, I feel the Mk IV is good to ISO1600 or thereabouts. My default Mk IV ISO is 800, and rarely do I go below that."

I completely agree. ISO 800 is my default setting also. At that point I see no drop off in quality. With the Mark III my default setting was 400. Above 800 one can see some fall off and under many circumstances 1600 is workable (although not as good as 800) Above 1600 the fall off becomes ever more radical.

Peter
Registered on June 25, 2007, 347 Posts, 3913 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Pullen on November 26, 2010 at 10:16 AM
Great action shot and comp.. Ron :toast:
Registered on December 18, 2005, 74 Posts, 1413 Comments
Comment posted by Geoffrey Baker on November 26, 2010 at 12:43 PM
A great action shot, I like how I can see the front of one bird and the back of the other :smile:
Well done.

Geoff.
Registered on August 20, 2010, 192 Posts, 980 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on November 26, 2010 at 8:56 PM
Techs aside I really like the interaction between the two birds in this image Peter. Kingfishers are fiesty birds and this shows that well.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on November 26, 2010 at 10:48 PM
Great action, Peter. I love the "poses" in this one. The high iso doesn't seem to have hurt the quality much. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on November 26, 2010 at 11:57 PM
Really sweet interaction here Peter. I think you maximized the opportunity with your techs - you needed all the depth of field and shutter speed you've got here to capture this, well done. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on November 27, 2010 at 5:30 PM
Great behavior Shoto Peter!!!

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments