Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Saltmarsh Sparrow II
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Saltmarsh Sparrow II

by Luke Ormand

Gallery: AvianPosted August 16, 2010107 views15 comments
Another Saltmarsh Sparrow, but this is from the next day (yesterday). I missed on the marbled godwits again due to a lack of patience - oh well it gives me something to continue to pursue. I still can't believe how complacent these birds were with me - they were practically walking up to my camera. This was 22 minutes after sunrise

Nikon D300s 300 f4 + 1.7X TC HH, Crouched
f/6.7
1/1000s
ISO 1250
-.67 EC

Cropped to 62% from horizontal, Sharpened Subject, Noise Reduction on BG

- Luke

Comments

15 comments
Comment posted by jamie pringle on August 16, 2010 at 8:00 PM
Nice lighting and pose of the sparrow. Nice results for hand holding this shot:toast:
Registered on August 10, 2005, 323 Posts, 1216 Comments
Comment posted by Hali Sowle on August 16, 2010 at 8:38 PM
Beautiful shot Luke and very impressive that it was handheld. Wonderful light and pose on the sparrow and great sharpness in the piece of grass as well as the sparrow
Registered on January 9, 2008, 36 Posts, 582 Comments
Comment posted by Muhammad Zaid Wani on August 16, 2010 at 8:46 PM
Excellent shot, Luke! I like the pose and the light is just perfect.

:toast:
Registered on August 18, 2005, 23 Posts, 1406 Comments
Comment posted by Terry Sohl on August 16, 2010 at 10:23 PM
Very nice warm light, and I love the setting and pose as well. Nicely done!
Registered on November 1, 2003, 513 Posts, 6889 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on August 16, 2010 at 10:33 PM
nice pose, comp, and warm light, Luke. in the larger version there's not quite as much fine detail in the bird as I'd hope for.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Simon Bennett on August 16, 2010 at 10:42 PM
Interesting pose with the feet so far apart.
Registered on February 4, 2007, 350 Posts, 4614 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on August 16, 2010 at 10:51 PM
Brian,

That would be due to the high ISO (I don't like going above 800 in such low light, so 1250 was pushing it) and the crop of almost 40%
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Richard Ditch on August 16, 2010 at 11:05 PM
You've had great fortune with this species. Nice work.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 1031 Posts, 12705 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Drummond on August 17, 2010 at 7:01 AM
Lovely light and pose Luke. Oh for a tripod and a lower ISO????

cheers
Rob
Registered on November 8, 2003, 617 Posts, 8267 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on August 17, 2010 at 10:32 AM
Incredibly warm light, Luke. Beautiful pose. In the larger image, it looks like there's some loss of detail due to noise. Coming from the land of no sun, I'm used to shooting at much lower shutter speeds on perched birds. I think you could have gotten away with it here if it wasn't too windy. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on August 17, 2010 at 11:56 AM
Dennis,

Thanks for your comments. This issue wasn't so much wind (it was relatively calm) but these birds were perching on spartina grass blades, which aren't so sturdy. I still don't know how this bird was able to hold on parallel like this - there is usually a lot of swaying when they go from blade to blade and that's what dictated a high SS.

I also had been shooting them at ground level where there was less light and this one happend to hop up on the grass. I could have lowered the ISO to 800 most likely and gotten away with it but live and learn.

I will post another photo of this species from later in the morning in this upcoming week that was at a lower ISO (but of course had less warmth)
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Satie Sharma on August 17, 2010 at 12:19 PM
Lovely light and pose, Luke. I think you got some nice detail despite the high ISO. I would crop this to a traditional 3:2. :toast:
Registered on November 11, 2003, 189 Posts, 5335 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on August 17, 2010 at 7:03 PM
A great species and pose you caught here Luke. At first I thought it was a little dark but looking at the large image I think it works fine and was probably consistent with the conditions. I agree if you could have gotten away with a lower shutter speed and iso it would have improved this. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on August 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM
Luke, nice shot, but the high ISO and somewhat large crop takes its toll on the detail in this image. Not sure how often you hand hold your shots, but with practice hand holding the set up you used for this shot and getting tack sharp images is well within reach. I almost never use a tripod, they just slow me down too much.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on August 19, 2010 at 9:58 PM
Luke,

I envy you the opportunity with this species, I find them very lovely, but oh so difficult to photograph. Nice light, pose and eye contact.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments