Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Hummingbird+Repost
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Hummingbird+Repost

by Steve Balke

Gallery: AvianPosted August 12, 2010164 views14 comments
Ruby Throated Hummingbird (Archilochus colubris)

This hummingbird stayed around for quite awhile. However, most of my shots are of her with her bill in a flower! I tried several camera settings too, with and without flash. The settings used here were the best.
I like the detail in this image. Again, as in a previous post I have a choice between showing two subjects in the composition (flower and bird) or only the bird. So, I’ll do both and hope that you will state your preference. The bird alone image also gives you a close-up of the bird in addition to the large version.

So, first, the bird plus flower composition.

7D, 400 mm f/5.6, 580EXII: ISO 400, 1/1250 s, f/5.6, image is 6.5 MP after cropping, fill flash, NR, some exposure and saturation adjustment (the flowers were so bright!), sharpening.

Comments

14 comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on August 12, 2010 at 9:06 PM
And now, the bird alone. Now the image is only 1.7 MP. Detail still looks good to me.

All comments welcome
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Peter Conway on August 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM
Hi Steve, Nice pose and composition. :toast: The hummer seems to have a strange blue cast.

Peter
Registered on June 25, 2007, 347 Posts, 3913 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on August 12, 2010 at 9:43 PM
You're right, Peter! Thank you. I never noticed that. I adjusted the white balance a bit. Here's another try at it. (it is also a test of my aging color vision!) I hope this fixes it! :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by John Tobias on August 12, 2010 at 9:58 PM
Nice HB shot, but it still has a color cast, on my monitor it is more green than blue.
Registered on September 12, 2009, 2120 Posts, 6455 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on August 12, 2010 at 10:17 PM
I prefer the bird with the flower in this case Steve. There's still a strange cast to the repost although not as strong as the original post. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on August 12, 2010 at 10:19 PM
O.K., once more with feeling....my wife assures me that the color cast is now gone........So, at least one person agrees with me... :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on August 12, 2010 at 11:05 PM
Steve: Nice capture of the hummer. Sounds like you had a lot of time with this little guy and you took advantage of it. Still a color cast (even after the second repost) to my eyes. Here's a version of the original with an attempt at removing all of the color cast. It may have gone too far, but I'm not sure what the background may have looked like.

Hope you don't mind my attempt at a color correction.

PS... Not wild about what this did to your red flower. I was just looking at the bird.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by Dennis Plank on August 12, 2010 at 11:37 PM
Very cool, Steve. As an ex-flora sort of guy, I think I prefer the one with the flower, though it certainly distracts from the hummingbird. I think the dark bg makes the flash a bit obvious-you may have to start playing with multi-flash setups :wink: From the looks of it, I'd guess you just applied noise reduction to the bg. There seems to be quite a bit in the wings. Since they're blurred, you might try doing some on them as well. :toast:
Registered on January 28, 2008, 1767 Posts, 23192 Comments
Comment posted by Bryan Hix on August 13, 2010 at 12:13 AM
Keith did the photo justice. It certainly had a green/blue cast to it that was distracting. Curious to know what you had WB set to? Auto?
Registered on June 13, 2008, 117 Posts, 755 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on August 13, 2010 at 10:17 AM
Thank you, everyone. Special thanks to Keith Bauer for taking the time to tackle the color cast. I too like his result. I don't have much time to make this comment. I can elaborate later if any of you have any further questions. This is a case where my error in post processing caused a lot of trouble. In trying to reduce the dominance of the bright red flower in the image I managed to lower the saturation on red in the image everywhere. The resulting color cast was not very evident to me because of the very dark background occupying most of the image (plus my limited vision!). The raw original does not show the color cast. Also, it doesn't show the noise in the wing that Dennis pointed out. Those were my "improvements" to the raw image! I'll rework this image eventually. However, I think I'll spend some time on another image of this same bird and post it tomorrow. Hopefully, it will be better! Thank you again, everyone. This whole thing has shore been a lesson to me! (ref: "Bad Man's Blunder"). :wink:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gatlin on August 13, 2010 at 1:50 PM
color cast aside, a nice hummingbird shot. I agree that the flower is a little overpowering, but also feel that the close crop is a little too tight--probably not too hard to paint in some extra bg/clone out the flower to give it a little more room. I agree about removing the noise from the wings.
Registered on March 21, 2009, 202 Posts, 4187 Comments
Comment posted by Martin Bartsch on August 13, 2010 at 3:47 PM
Ya, for me it looks very green too. It doesn't bother me at all though... I love the composition and the pose of the bird. It contrasts really nice with the colorful flower. Killer shot Steve!! :eek:
Registered on December 1, 2003, 80 Posts, 354 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on August 14, 2010 at 8:24 PM
Thank you so much for the additional comments. Too bad I made that error in processing because I agree that the shot has so many nice qualities. I am going to have another try at processing this one....based on the reception the new image of this hummer that I will post tonight receives. :smile:
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Balke on August 15, 2010 at 10:00 PM
Well, the second hummer image was well received. So, just for the record, here is the reprocessed version of this image.
Registered on June 18, 2009, 229 Posts, 2915 Comments