Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Furry Forest Fertilizer
‹ PreviousWildlife GalleryNext ›

Furry Forest Fertilizer

by Brad Hill

Gallery: WildlifePosted July 20, 2010676 views25 comments
Hey all,

I'm off to Haida Gwaii (formerly called the Queen Charlotte Islands) on Thursday for a few weeks of shooting so this will be my last image posted for awhile. The Haida Gwaii have no grizzlies, so I thought it would be appropriate to post this shot of a black bear (which ARE found on Haida Gwaii)...

This was a very tough shot to create. On average, I find Black Bears trickier to photograph than Brown (or "Grizzly") Bears, largely because it can be very challenging to get the exposure right and ensuring that the subtle black-on-black detail is retained. Commonly when photographing Black Bears (or any other dark objects that are filling your frame) it's best to slightly over-expose the image (relative to what your light meter is telling you) to capture the full tonal range of their "black-on-black" coats. But in this shot getting the right exposure was even tougher - the reflected highlights on the "wet bits" (including the bear's snout, the salmon, and the water below the bear and between its legs) really complicated things. Any over-exposure of this scene would have lead to a major blowout of highlight details that could not have been retrieved. To "solve" the problem of potentially blown highlights I did two things: I used a circular polarizing filter to cut some of the glare of the reflections and I exposed to just retain highlight detail (which, in this case, meant a slight UNDER-exposure, despite the darkness of the subject). The resulting raw file appeared to have BOTH blown highlight detail and lost shadow detail (this scene had a huge brightness/dynamic range). But, when I looked at my histogram I was quite confident I had enough "headroom" in the file to retrieve both the highlights and the shadows. This is definitely an example of where my processing experience with files specific to the camera I used influenced how I chose to capture the image (i.e., I had to know how much shadow detail AND highlight detail I could actually retrieve from a D700 file without introducing noise). I daresay this is an image that could NOT have been effectively captured as a JPEG file (at least with current technology).

Besides being a good example of a "shoot-to-process" capture, this is one of those rare images where the photographer (me) actually likes the result! I like this image both as a photographer and as a biologist. As a photographer I like the image on two levels. First is simply the drama and action (and the fact that both the eyes of the bear and the eye of the salmon are in focus!). Plus, from a compositional perspective there's a subtle repeating pattern that appeals to my eye (and is what caught my eye when I was culling the images and saved it from the trash bin). I'm referring to the repeating pattern of curves and arches, including the arching "tunnel" between the bear's legs,the curve of the fish, the curve at the top of the bear's head, the arch of the bear's forelegs, and, finally, through to the arch of the backside of the bear.

As a biologist I like the image because it nicely illustrates the role of bears (both black and brown) as keystone species in coastal regions. Keystone species are those which play an ecological role that is disproportionate to their numbers (or biomass) in the ecosystem. In other words, they have a disproportionately large role in influencing the composition of the other species in the ecosystem. While this bear is obviously having an impact on the future of THIS fish, what isn't shown here is what happened AFTER the image was shot and how it impacts on the "big picture" (i.e., the ecosystem). And that event was the bear disappearing far into the forest and munching on the fish. This act - taking the fish off into the forest and leaving its carcass there - plays a huge role in getting nitrogen FROM the fish INTO those massive trees of the Great Bear Rainforest. Studies (tracing the isotopes of nitrogen found in salmon) have shown that a major source of nitrogen in the trees come from the salmon - with the bear unwittingly acting as the diligent forest fertilizer! Take the bears away and the trees lose their furry fertilizing agents and the forest changes in structure. Cool, eh?

Subject: Black Bear (Ursus american kermodei) with slippery prize
Location: Northern BC Coast (Great Bear Rainforest), Canada
Camera: Nikon D700
Lens: Nikkor 600 mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S VR lens - handheld. VR on and in "Normal" mode.
Exposure: 1/160s at f5. ISO 720. -0.33 stop compensation from matrix metered exposure.
Crop: Very small - this is about 95% of the original capture

All the contextual information surrounding this shot (field notes, all camera settings and processing details, conservation, etc.) can be found at:

http://www.naturalart.ca/galleries/latest/.

Comments and feedback greatly appreciated...probably better to view larger version prior to doing so...

Cheers...

Brad

Comments

25 comments
Comment posted by Philip Hodgkins on July 20, 2010 at 2:33 PM
No critique, Brad—you said everything I wanted to say and more! :biggrin: My comment is simply to say how much I appreciate both the technical commentary and the ecological commentary. Well done! :toast:
Registered on July 24, 2006, 2741 Posts, 12349 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on July 20, 2010 at 3:10 PM
Brad,

A very cool shot with a nice mix of sharpness and blur. The detail and subtle colors in the fish are amazing. You mention seeing the histogram and feeling you had enough "headroom". Can you post a screen shot of the histogram before and after? I think that would help some of us (me anyways) to visualize it and be able to apply it in the field (or at the computer). Thanks.

- Luke
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Daniel & Loana on July 20, 2010 at 3:28 PM
The image is wonderful, as usual.
I would like to underline that we appreciate very much the explanations you provide with your images.

Thank you and congrats

D&L
Registered on October 7, 2008, 166 Posts, 3044 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on July 20, 2010 at 3:34 PM
Good question Luke - here ya go - a quick and dirty look at the histograms. But be careful in generalizing from this - as you can see from the "BEFORE" histogram there looks to be a lot of blown highlights (notice how far up the y axis the pixels are on the right hand side of the histogram) - how much highlight detail you can retrieve varies pretty dramatically between raw converters. I use Phase One's Capture One Pro - in MY experience it does a better job with highlight retrieval than competing products. Also bear in mind that these histograms are from different apps - I used ACR to quickly grab the "BEFORE" histogram (but it looked very similar in Capture One Pro) and CS5 for the final histogram (my "Master" in this case is a 16-bit TIFF).

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Onno de Rover on July 20, 2010 at 4:11 PM
Hi Brad, Stunning picture and I enjoyed your lecture! Good trip!
Registered on December 29, 2009, 38 Posts, 63 Comments
Comment posted by Laura Stafford on July 20, 2010 at 4:18 PM
Interesting information, and amazing shot. All I can say is WOW................

Laura Stafford
Registered on November 3, 2009, 52 Posts, 375 Comments
Comment posted by Neil Rossmiller on July 20, 2010 at 9:40 PM
Brad,
The mentoring you provide here in fauna is remarkable.
The images, eye candy!
Have a great trip!
Neil
Registered on October 30, 2009, 156 Posts, 749 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce Palla on July 20, 2010 at 10:14 PM
Awesome photo and the description of process is outstanding as well!! There's a couple of reasons for being a great Moderator.
Registered on December 19, 2007, 25 Posts, 328 Comments
Comment posted by Brandon Sideleau on July 21, 2010 at 2:37 AM
Very cool Brad....love the eye-contact
Registered on October 6, 2006, 79 Posts, 173 Comments
Comment posted by Jagdeep Rajput on July 21, 2010 at 8:06 AM
A terrific frame, very well captured & processed. The details and colours are amazing. I truly appreciate your commentary in detail, it is highly informative.
Coming back to picture, I just love the fish ...shining like a diamond here and the details on bear.
I may prefer to tone down slightly, the bright space between the legs, just to retain the low key effect and let the bright n colourful fish grab all the attention.
Have a great trip!
Jagdeep Rajput :toast: :toast: :toast:
Registered on April 29, 2008, 686 Posts, 2857 Comments
Comment posted by Brian Gallagher on July 21, 2010 at 8:07 AM
I would also like to thank you for the time you take to explain your surroundings and the technical decisions you make. Your bear photographs show your talent and knowledge every time.
Registered on April 21, 2007, 7 Posts, 54 Comments
Comment posted by Dan Walters on July 21, 2010 at 8:28 AM
Like how you got the eyes of both fish and bear. I like the details in the blacks and the tight crop makes for a more intimate view.
Registered on October 30, 2005, 405 Posts, 3693 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on July 21, 2010 at 1:15 PM
Technically perfect once again Brad and a great job in post-processing. Also another example of how important PP is to achieve a good end result. I love basically everything about this, but if anything at all, I would have like to see this from a slightly lower perspective (yes even lower! :wink: ) for comparison sake. Have great trip! :toast:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Brad Hill on July 21, 2010 at 1:23 PM
Hey all,

Thanks for the positive feedback on my postings (and this image). To me it's worth it to take the time - I firmly believe in sharing information and not "holding back" information in the fear of being scooped (which I've always thought was totally ridiculous...but whatever!). I'm glad y'all appreciate the effort!

Vincent - you said:
if anything at all, I would have like to see this from a slightly lower perspective (yes even lower!)
.
Cripes...I was kneeling in the water with the bear when I took this! I guess the next step is an underwater housing (which I recently picked up by the way...). Sigh... :wink:

Cheers...

Brad
Registered on May 29, 2007, 431 Posts, 6061 Comments
Comment posted by Vincent Grafhorst on July 21, 2010 at 2:05 PM
Cripes...I was kneeling in the water with the bear when I took this! I guess the next step is an underwater housing (which I recently picked up by the way...). Sigh...


I did not say it would be easy Brad. Just keeping you on your toes and helping you achieve 'impossible' images. :biggrin:
Registered on February 24, 2006, 504 Posts, 7203 Comments
Comment posted by Matthew Goldsmith on July 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM
Beautiful shot Brad. The texture in the fur and the colors in the fish are spectacular. I'm looking forward to seeing your images from Haida Gwaii. 22 years ago I spent 3 weeks sea kayaking in South Moresby with 9 friends (before it was renamed Haida Gwaii). I was shooting print film with a Pentax K1000. I haven't looked at the images in many years (not sure if I can even find them). I vividly remember one evening walking down the beach where we were camped to collect fresh water from a stream and encountering the largest black bear that I have ever seen. have a great trip.
Registered on June 29, 2010, 37 Posts, 286 Comments
Comment posted by Clinton Bauder on July 21, 2010 at 6:03 PM
Brad said:
I guess the next step is an underwater housing (which I recently picked up by the way...). Sigh...


So - guessing we'll soon be seeing over/under shots with salmon below and bears above right? :cool:
Registered on December 8, 2009, 31 Posts, 231 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Archer on July 21, 2010 at 9:49 PM
Another killer photo Brad!!! Have a great trip!

Ken Archer
Registered on October 28, 2004, 222 Posts, 6683 Comments
Comment posted by Nate Chappell on July 22, 2010 at 7:52 PM
Sweet shot Brad, the arches jumped out at me in this image. :toast:
Registered on February 1, 2006, 1158 Posts, 19528 Comments
Comment posted by Upjeet Singh on July 24, 2010 at 2:53 AM
Marvelous shot Brad, what is really catching for me in this image is the eyes of both Predator and Prey. Not to forget the colors and sharpness spot on.

:toast:
Registered on May 8, 2010, 50 Posts, 55 Comments
Comment posted by Harshad Barve on July 27, 2010 at 11:14 PM
Just adding my congratulations for mighty fine image
Registered on July 25, 2010, 39 Posts, 210 Comments
Comment posted by Edwin kats on July 29, 2010 at 6:49 AM
Superb. Great story too.

Edwin Kats
Registered on April 24, 2006, 177 Posts, 399 Comments
Comment posted by Onno de Rover on July 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM
Hi Brad ... stunning picture and a realy good lecture. However..I think that the drama of the action would be enheightend if you would be able to cut away the green in the upper corners. Even if you cut of the ears a bit it would benefit the image... cool shot!!
Registered on December 29, 2009, 38 Posts, 63 Comments
Comment posted by Onno de Rover on July 29, 2010 at 5:02 PM
Hi Brad ... stunning picture and a realy good lecture. However..I think that the drama of the action would be enheightend if you would be able to cut away the green in the upper corners. (maybe even if you cut of the ears a bit) it would benefit the image... cool shot!!
Registered on December 29, 2009, 38 Posts, 63 Comments
Comment posted by Muhammad Zaid Wani on August 7, 2010 at 9:57 AM
Brad,

Such a wonderful shot! :eek: I enjoy reading the commentary you provide with your posts. I find them very informative as does everyone else.

- Zaid
Registered on August 18, 2005, 23 Posts, 1406 Comments