Grey-cheeked Thrush
by Jim DeWitt
Olympus E-3, 300mm x 2.0TC, tripod
f5.7, 1/250, ISO250
Denali Highway, last weekend. This guy was still singing on territory. Is the willow catkin behind his head distracting (and should it be cloned out?) or is it part of the habitat?
C & C, please. Thanks for looking.
Comments
15 commentsThe catkin may not be ideal, but I wouldn't clone it out.
The entire scene is nice with good lighting. I'm not a purist so out with the catkin. Was this a big crop or was the original under exposed. Just seems like the clarity is down some in the large image. It also appears the focal point was on the wings as the head is not as sharp as the rest of the bird. It becomes more apparent in the large image.
Thanks for posting,
Ronnie G.
Nice capture here. As far as the branch behind the head it is a little distracting to me ONLY because I can't see where it's coming from. It looks as if it's free foating in space or growing out of the birds head. The only other small nit I have is that it looks like you were focused near the tail of the bird and not the head as it appears to be just a tad softer than the rear of the wing feathers and tail and there is no catchlight in the eye. Otherwise I really like the composition, and the inclusion of all the branches and leaves. They frame the shot nicely for me. The OOF lower third is very nice as well. Are they mountains in the distance? I really like this shot Jim and the removal of that one branch behind the head would put this over the top for me. Thanks for sharing this one Jim.
I've been a little slow commenting this week due to a couple things, but I am very glad to see this image you posted from last weekend. I hope that gave you a break from the smoke and fires near Fairbanks and that you have had some relief in the form of rain, if not maybe we can send you some from Utah, I have seen enough of it ;-)
I don't mind the catkin behind the bird much because my mind figured out where it comes from easily. I do think the timage would be stronger without it, but I am not a big fan of cloning so I would try Gary's suggestion or something similar to minimize the impact of the catkin a bit.
I like the setting, the pose of the thrush aling with the smooth gradation of hues in the background.
If this were mine I would be very tempted to tone the exposure down -0.03 to -0.8 which seems to show more of the feather details and while it does not change the actual saturation of the colors in the image it does seem to make them look richer. I might also give the thrush a touch more selective sharpening.
I envy you, I was never able to get this species out in the open in FL and they are uncommon here in UT.