Gallery: LandscapePosted May 16, 2010149 views12 comments
Unfortunately, the sun was high and hot by the time we got here. Fortunately, I had a great day out.
D-60, ISO-200 (my bad), 1/15th, f-20 at 55mm. No polarizer, obviously. Thanks for looking!
Comments
12 comments
Comment posted by Lon Overacker on May 16, 2010 at 8:48 PM
Bill,
The great thing about this time of the year is that the trees are filling out and help block some of that direct light. I think you caught it at a time when I can't see very many, if any, hot spots.
This is a lovely and refreshing scene. Now I see a whole bunch of opportunities to focus on smaller sections of this scene, but for an overall view, this is quite nice.
I may wish to not have those few green leaves intruding, but I guess that's asking a little bit too much and being picky.
Lon
Registered on November 24, 2006, 521 Posts, 19147 Comments
Comment posted by John Williams on May 17, 2010 at 12:11 AM
Sweet set of falls. This has a nice flow to it. It looks a little soft on my monitor.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 221 Posts, 5985 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on May 17, 2010 at 3:50 AM
Thanks Lon and John, shot w/ tripod and doesn't look soft on my monitor at all, but that's been happening a lot when I convert them for here. hmmmm. And thanks Lon, I wanted to post something in the 1/2 to 1/5 second as a start here, but I think I'd have to issue sunglasses. I shot them. And yes, there are lovely little nooks, crannies and flows for many different crops and captures.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by István Molnár on May 17, 2010 at 6:29 AM
Nice work!
István
Registered on January 7, 2010, 114 Posts, 704 Comments
Comment posted by Jeff Loomis on May 17, 2010 at 11:56 AM
Very nice with lots of potential for other comps as mentioned. The polarizer would capitalize on those rich greens and make this even better. I wish I had a location like this to work on.
Registered on January 26, 2010, 68 Posts, 719 Comments
Comment posted by Wendy Blanchard on May 17, 2010 at 12:44 PM
I think you did an awesome job on this with all that sun hitting the water. Beautiful shot!
Registered on June 11, 2006, 58 Posts, 647 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on May 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM
Thanks folks. I need to go back earlier a.m. though for my own mind. And IDK why this looks so soft on here.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Nick Bristol on May 17, 2010 at 2:22 PM
A pretty scene, Bill. Easy to see why you had a great day. It also looks soft on my monitor, but guess I can't tell you what is going on. I have a hard time getting the sharpness right for the web with many of my images. I keep working on it. This does look like a great place to wander around.
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, Wi.
Registered on February 1, 2004, 752 Posts, 14140 Comments
Comment posted by Bruce King on May 17, 2010 at 4:20 PM
Nice scene Bill. You've done pretty well with the tough light.
Sharpening for the web is a roll of the dice for me also, so I know where you're coming from. Others probably have different or better methods but here's what I do. I sharpen a little in ACR but don't sharpen in the editor until I've reduced the file size to whatever parameters I need. In other words I sharpen last and I use the unsharp mask most of the time. Strength setting varies of course. Radius between 6-8 most of the time and threshold at or near 3 for landscapes maybe a little higher for something like a flower macro. I'm also viewing the image at 100% while making these adjustments and back off or increase as needed. Then I click view and select actual pixels to see how it looks. If it looks OK I go ahead and post it. But often, as you have also discovered it doesn't look the same online as it does on my monitor. So, I quickly delete it and try again. Just my 2 cents.
Also I notice you shot this at 55mm. If you're using the Nikon 18-55 kit lens try backing off a little and get closer or put on a longer lens. I have this lens and use it a lot but my copy is quite soft at 55mm. But you say it looks sharp on your system so that probably isn't the issue. See you around and happy shooting.
Registered on January 14, 2010, 276 Posts, 2212 Comments
Comment posted by John Kerr on May 17, 2010 at 5:27 PM
Nicely done Bill.
Registered on October 28, 2009, 111 Posts, 1070 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on May 17, 2010 at 6:19 PM
Thanks again. Bruce, I appreciate your help since you've experienced same.
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Maile on May 18, 2010 at 5:49 AM
going to finally play with a polarizer!! and so, that means no sun for the next few days I'm sure. ;)
Registered on March 2, 2009, 984 Posts, 2518 Comments
Comments
12 commentsThe great thing about this time of the year is that the trees are filling out and help block some of that direct light. I think you caught it at a time when I can't see very many, if any, hot spots.
This is a lovely and refreshing scene. Now I see a whole bunch of opportunities to focus on smaller sections of this scene, but for an overall view, this is quite nice.
I may wish to not have those few green leaves intruding, but I guess that's asking a little bit too much and being picky.
Lon
István
Nick Bristol
Lone Rock, Wi.
Sharpening for the web is a roll of the dice for me also, so I know where you're coming from. Others probably have different or better methods but here's what I do. I sharpen a little in ACR but don't sharpen in the editor until I've reduced the file size to whatever parameters I need. In other words I sharpen last and I use the unsharp mask most of the time. Strength setting varies of course. Radius between 6-8 most of the time and threshold at or near 3 for landscapes maybe a little higher for something like a flower macro. I'm also viewing the image at 100% while making these adjustments and back off or increase as needed. Then I click view and select actual pixels to see how it looks. If it looks OK I go ahead and post it. But often, as you have also discovered it doesn't look the same online as it does on my monitor. So, I quickly delete it and try again. Just my 2 cents.
Also I notice you shot this at 55mm. If you're using the Nikon 18-55 kit lens try backing off a little and get closer or put on a longer lens. I have this lens and use it a lot but my copy is quite soft at 55mm. But you say it looks sharp on your system so that probably isn't the issue. See you around and happy shooting.