Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Exposed Hummingbirds
‹ PreviousMan & Fauna GalleryNext ›

Exposed Hummingbirds

by Richard Ditch

Gallery: Man & FaunaPosted April 26, 2010515 views7 comments
Anna's Hummingbird (Calypte anna)

Place: Boyce Thompson Arboretum, Superior, AZ, USA
Date: April 11, 2010
Equipment: Nikon D200, Nikkor AF-S 300/2.8, TC20E (2x), SB-800, G1325, RRS BH-55, Sidekick
Exposure: ISO 200, Aperture priority matrix metered @ +2/3 ec, 1/60th at f/11, fill flash
Raw, PS CS3 on Mac G4, full frame

First my apologies for cross-posting this in two galleries – I put it in Avian early yesterday to make sure the message got the widest exposure possible.

I rarely do any nest photography as I don't want to put the young birds at risk, but I do shoot some hummingbirds at Boyce. This nest was located along a very popular trail and was pointed out to me by one of the staff. I looked hard for a position that would give a view of the nest without touching any of the overhanging foliage. I was happy with this view and more happy that no other people had come along the trail while I was shooting. I departed without having disturbed the nestlings, nest, or vegetation.

When I shared this shot with a friend he showed me his shots taken about a week before when he had discovered the nest. It was obvious that between the time he'd taken his shots and I'd taken mine someone had trimmed some of the overhanging vegetation to allow the view I had here. This really makes me sick – knowing that anyone would put these birds at risk for the selfish reasons of getting a clean photo.

I feel a bit guilty about getting a good shot as a result of someone else's selfish and stupid act, and I considered not posting this in either gallery. But as others have pointed out it is important to share this message of ethical behavior to all aspiring bird photographers.

Comments

7 comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on April 27, 2010 at 7:07 AM
Rich, I like the way you caught the youngsters looking in different directions, the interesting nest construction and the varied colors in the setting.

The vulnerability of the nest is clear, especially with it seeming to sit so precariously out in the middle of that branch. An excellent image and commentary for this forum, particularly this time of year. I simply can't imagine putting nestlings at risk for the sake of a photo. I think this practice of trimming vegetation around nests for photography is often done out of ignorance and if the potential consequences were thought through more carefully many who do it, wouldn't.

Thanks for posting this. An excellent reminder to the bird photography community and perfect timing.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments
Comment posted by Rob Graham on April 27, 2010 at 11:27 PM
Richard, kudos for disturbing or revealing the nest. To bad not everybody felt the same way about leaving the nest alone.
Registered on August 22, 2006, 842 Posts, 2824 Comments
Comment posted by Hank Pennington on April 27, 2010 at 11:47 PM
This exposes my the cynical side of my nature, but I suspect the !@#$%!@#$ who cut the limbs knew exactly what he/she was doing. In fact, if you camped out there for a few days I bet you'd meet the miscreant. Such is human nature, and photographers are not immune.

Good catch and great photo, even without the background info. I'm fascinated with these little guys and nesting, but I don't get many chances to see them up here.

And do me a favor: If you figure out who did it, "trip" on their tripod leg just for me. I love the sound of big glass hitting the ground.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 226 Posts, 1532 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on May 4, 2010 at 11:52 AM
Incredibly selfish. Not just for the risk of injury to the hatchlings, but also for the damage it does to the reputation of all avian photographers. Well-captured and documented, Richard, and congratulations on a well-deserved EP.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on May 4, 2010 at 10:41 PM
Richards, congrats on a nice EP!

Sandy r
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by Kurt Bowman on May 6, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Thanks for posting this Richard and thanks for the story to go with it. I was on another site I will leave un-named and viewed a couple of nest shots (from obviously the same location) were it was obvious the chicks were not taken into consideration. They looked scared and frightened. The shot was full frame and taken with an 80-200mm and filled the frame. The worst part is; all the praise they were given on the shots by other photogs. I couldn't believe no one said anything and everyone seemed to turn an eye. It kind of made me sick. Thanks for having ethics.
Registered on June 19, 2008, 1005 Posts, 8028 Comments
Comment posted by Erik Van de Water on May 21, 2010 at 12:38 AM
"Thanks for having ethics." Well said and amen Kurt!
Kudos to you Richard for the explanation and documentation of this event. I like the centered comp. and tilt of the chicks head. The sidelighting also helps.
Registered on February 27, 2010, 6 Posts, 72 Comments