Gallery: LandscapePosted April 5, 2010964 views37 comments
This is another image from the same area as my last post. It was a beautiful morning with some lovely light.
Comments
37 comments
Comment posted by Abdullaziz Bin Ali on April 5, 2010 at 2:47 AM
Amazing Zack
The light is absolutely stunning. I like this post as well
on the left frame, i feel these twigs are distracting a little bit
Waiting for the next gorgeous work :)
Registered on May 31, 2009, 112 Posts, 1590 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Schnepf on April 5, 2010 at 2:57 AM
Here is a cropped version without the twigs on the left side. It is a bit cleaner overall.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2528 Comments
Comment posted by Andrius Pašukonis on April 5, 2010 at 3:08 AM
Its gorgeous! I also wanted to mention the twigs on the left and than I saw the repost. It looks better.
Registered on July 23, 2005, 111 Posts, 408 Comments
Comment posted by R.Bill Moser on April 5, 2010 at 3:34 AM
This is gorgeous again. Stunning light. I would also crop a bit from the left since this twigs are distracting a little bit. So I'd prefer the second post. Otherwise a perfect shot.
Registered on January 29, 2010, 285 Posts, 4281 Comments
Comment posted by Verena & Georg Pop on April 5, 2010 at 3:40 AM
very beautiful. the crop is an improvement. extremeyl pleasant to look at, although the momentum of surprise is a bit weakened by the fact it looks so similar to Marcs version of this scene.
this will make a great print.
georg
Registered on July 5, 2006, 272 Posts, 2823 Comments
Comment posted by Bill Chambers on April 5, 2010 at 6:30 AM
Outstanding Zack - pops right off the screen!
Registered on April 10, 2005, 753 Posts, 21216 Comments
Comment posted by Guy Tal on April 5, 2010 at 8:55 AM
This is gorgeous, Zack! An absolutely stunning image.
Guy
Registered on November 1, 2003, 566 Posts, 15507 Comments
Comment posted by Wayne Willison on April 5, 2010 at 9:00 AM
Burning Softly is a fitting title indeed. I can't stop looking at this wonderful light show.
But I disagree with cropping the left side. First, the original inclusion of the trees served to keep the eye on the tree colors and not the background, which pales in comparison. Second, when I consider burning I think spreading, raging, and that the fire goes on and on. In this image, because it's so powerful I want to think, fire out of control.
Registered on April 10, 2009, 292 Posts, 3967 Comments
Comment posted by Robert Dayton on April 5, 2010 at 9:55 AM
The lighting is stunning. Good find, Zack!
Registered on November 11, 2008, 281 Posts, 3958 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Schnepf on April 5, 2010 at 10:18 AM
Well dang it, here I thought I was being original, I haven't seen Marc's version of this particular comp. I couldn't find it on his site, or anywhere for that matter. Can someone send me a link?
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2528 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Breitkreuz on April 5, 2010 at 11:45 AM
A really wonderful rendition of the infamous "Owens Valley" look. I think the cropped version is the ticket here, Zack.
Registered on February 25, 2006, 525 Posts, 8448 Comments
Comment posted by Youssef Ismail on April 5, 2010 at 1:08 PM
It is a very nice image Zack. I love that forground, it looks like its on fire.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 474 Posts, 5555 Comments
Comment posted by Stan Rose on April 5, 2010 at 2:20 PM
This is nicer than the last--love the fg lighting here! definitely cropped.
Registered on September 15, 2005, 836 Posts, 17099 Comments
Comment posted by Ian Plant on April 5, 2010 at 2:27 PM
wonderful warm/cool contrast, beautifully done
Registered on July 7, 2008, 271 Posts, 1657 Comments
Comment posted by Chip Phillips on April 5, 2010 at 2:53 PM
Beautiful Zack. The light is fantastic here. The crop is an improvement as well.
Nice work as always.
Registered on November 26, 2007, 128 Posts, 1436 Comments
Comment posted by Miguel BŽrubŽ on April 5, 2010 at 3:10 PM
Registered on August 13, 2007, 1 Posts, 58 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Schnepf on April 5, 2010 at 3:38 PM
Thanks for the link Miguel. Yes, that is one of my favorites of Marc's, and the one that inspired my post from last week. This image is from a different nearby area.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2528 Comments
Comment posted by Morris McClung on April 5, 2010 at 5:39 PM
The crop works better, but the light and color in this series is just stunning. Marvelous shot.
Registered on May 7, 2007, 670 Posts, 19650 Comments
Comment posted by Floris van Breugel on April 5, 2010 at 6:00 PM
What incredible light you had, though it does look a little saturated to me - I don't think it would lose any impact with a bit less saturation. The crop is a great improvement for me. I love how the foliage in the bottom really looks like flames! Regarding the similarity between this and Marc's image.. while it's clearly a different composition, it's also clearly a derivative of his, which is not necessarily a bad thing.. but perhaps worth noting as you did on the previous post. Don't get me wrong, I've been quite tempted to take a shot here myself, I just couldn't accept standing next to all the highway traffic That and the fact that I would never feel comfortable calling the image own.
Registered on December 19, 2008, 306 Posts, 4840 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Schnepf on April 5, 2010 at 6:20 PM
I do know what you mean Floris, and this is indeed a similar area. The difference is this a different stand of trees all together, and while it does look similar, I was actually attempting to do something different with this shot than I had ever seen from this area. Granted, my last shot is really similar to Marc's. I'm not sure it's possible to shoot a completely original composition at this location, it's just been shot by too many photographers including Marc and it is a relatively small area, but that should not stop me or anyone else from trying something original from this or any other iconic location. Both my shots from here are in completely different light than Marc's image, and as I explained before, I really was trying to do something original with this one.
Like it or not, Marc's shot is so iconic that people will always remember it and judge any other shot from the area against it. Whether any shot of the same location can be called original is more a philosophical question. What I do know is how much I enjoyed photographing this area, and that I was using my own compositional skills to create this particular image, I didn't base this comp on any other image. To me it is original, but that is my own subjective opinion, and there will always be comparison to such an iconic shot and photographer.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2528 Comments
Comment posted by Jeremy Kessler on April 5, 2010 at 6:41 PM
Gorgeous image, I wouldn't mind seeing it with a little less saturation for comparison,
Registered on September 13, 2007, 36 Posts, 1283 Comments
Comment posted by Zack Schnepf on April 5, 2010 at 6:44 PM
Here is a version with zero vibrance, or saturation for comparison. As you can see it didn't have very much added to start with, but there is a difference. Especially in print, I prefer the little bit of saturation.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 403 Posts, 2528 Comments
Comment posted by Anthony Vincent on April 5, 2010 at 7:27 PM
Now that's a nice bath of light Zack. The crop is a winner. Love the textures and layers.
Registered on February 5, 2009, 199 Posts, 2775 Comments
Comment posted by Paul Duval on April 5, 2010 at 8:20 PM
If Ansel Adams can shoot the Cliff dwellings from almost the same spot as Timothy O'Sullivan then I guess you'll be ok Zack, and I would bet there were many photographers prior to Adamus that took pictures of this brush and trees. No one cares about impinging on their artistic vision, and I'm inspired by many images taken as well .
Ok, just visted Adamus website and viewed the image in question, your shot is not identical and it would be pushing it to even call it derivative, unless taking a picture of something similar, even under different light could be considered as such. Anyway your interpretations are great images and I haven't seen this spot in all my travels around the Owens Valley, but I'm sure I will stumble across it, and if conditions and the light are right you bet I'm getting the camera out. With apologies to all previous photographers.
Paul
Registered on June 30, 2009, 508 Posts, 1907 Comments
Comment posted by Ken Johnson on April 5, 2010 at 8:53 PM
Zach, Stunning display of light. Great Job!!! Nicely done.
Registered on March 7, 2010, 71 Posts, 272 Comments
Comment posted by Jeff Hackett on April 5, 2010 at 9:00 PM
I'll go with the repost. This image has some POP to it!
Registered on March 13, 2006, 65 Posts, 1119 Comments
Comment posted by Tony Kuyper on April 5, 2010 at 9:37 PM
Cropped version is better, IMO. Love the scene, though it doesn't feel quite as real as some of your other images. I'm the first to admit that an image doesn't have to be a straight take on reality, but the intensity here seems a bit strong. I like the less vibrance version better.
Registered on November 1, 2003, 364 Posts, 22328 Comments
Comment posted by Dean Sauskojus on April 6, 2010 at 1:30 AM
Love the reds and the oranges. Looks like you have a nice simple background here which really adds the refinement of the image also. Nice work here Zack.
Registered on September 29, 2009, 137 Posts, 2659 Comments
Comment posted by Roger Nordstrom on April 6, 2010 at 1:08 PM
I just got a burst of warmth. I like the feeling. I would try darkening the background a little to make the trees stand out a bit more. But I like it.
Registered on May 5, 2009, 8 Posts, 43 Comments
Comment posted by Scott Smorra on April 6, 2010 at 9:53 PM
Beautiful photo Zack. I like the comp and feel it is different enough from Adamus' photo to stand on its own.
Registered on November 2, 2009, 161 Posts, 2143 Comments
Comment posted by Adrian Klein on April 6, 2010 at 10:13 PM
Definitely the cropped version, this is real nice Zack. What amazing light! And this is a different comp than Marc's and that is a whole different topic IMO. Not sure what the fuss is around that. Many places will be photographed by many photographers, simple as that.
Registered on June 10, 2007, 112 Posts, 1506 Comments
Comment posted by Jimmy Gekas on April 6, 2010 at 11:04 PM
Man, that light is killer. What a super image, Zack!
Registered on July 26, 2007, 244 Posts, 2807 Comments
Comment posted by Chris Chamberlain on April 6, 2010 at 11:35 PM
Yeah, I recognize this because of Marc's shot. But this is all yours( I have read that it is a different group of trees). The light and on fire color is fantastic. I agree that a lot of people are going to have shot the same locations. It doesn't grant an exclusive to be the first. Besides, I have looked for this spot a couple of times with no success. But when I do find it, I will definately get my versions too. Is it near 395, or somewhere else in the valley?
Chris
Registered on March 13, 2007, 500 Posts, 8365 Comments
Comment posted by Rick Lundh on April 7, 2010 at 1:37 AM
This is a beautiful image, Zack. I wish I had one of these in my portfolio. I dont care if images are very similar to someone elses, as long as that photographer doesnt have a full gallery of copies with little original work. Its sad for me to see some "profesisonal copycats" around on the forums. It's great to get inspiration...nothing wrong with that. Some sites have little options for differentiating comps, especially if you have an eye for proper comps and it sounds like this is one of those areas. Where was this taken?
Registered on April 28, 2004, 774 Posts, 4351 Comments
Comment posted by Kevin Trinkner on April 7, 2010 at 8:01 AM
Wonderful colors and comp, great find.
Registered on June 30, 2008, 203 Posts, 2641 Comments
Comment posted by Matt Anderson on April 7, 2010 at 8:04 AM
Let me say that I really like the dramatic tones and color. I don't like the intruding bush on the left, nor the bush bleeding off on the right. I wish the central and main feature was surrounded by the blueish shadowed brush on the hill behind. I know you can't control that. All and all the glowing golden hour brush is quite amazing.
Registered on September 6, 2007, 346 Posts, 2696 Comments
Comment posted by David Cobb on April 7, 2010 at 3:33 PM
Beautiful light and color here Zack, and a wonderful comp especially with the crop version.
Registered on December 14, 2007, 312 Posts, 3243 Comments
Comments
37 commentsThe light is absolutely stunning. I like this post as well
on the left frame, i feel these twigs are distracting a little bit
Waiting for the next gorgeous work :)
this will make a great print.
georg
Guy
But I disagree with cropping the left side. First, the original inclusion of the trees served to keep the eye on the tree colors and not the background, which pales in comparison. Second, when I consider burning I think spreading, raging, and that the fire goes on and on. In this image, because it's so powerful I want to think, fire out of control.
Nice work as always.
http://www.marcadamus.com/photo.php?id=13&gallery=favorites
Like it or not, Marc's shot is so iconic that people will always remember it and judge any other shot from the area against it. Whether any shot of the same location can be called original is more a philosophical question. What I do know is how much I enjoyed photographing this area, and that I was using my own compositional skills to create this particular image, I didn't base this comp on any other image. To me it is original, but that is my own subjective opinion, and there will always be comparison to such an iconic shot and photographer.
Ok, just visted Adamus website and viewed the image in question, your shot is not identical and it would be pushing it to even call it derivative, unless taking a picture of something similar, even under different light could be considered as such. Anyway your interpretations are great images and I haven't seen this spot in all my travels around the Owens Valley, but I'm sure I will stumble across it, and if conditions and the light are right you bet I'm getting the camera out. With apologies to all previous photographers.
Paul
Chris