Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Eagle Flight
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Eagle Flight

by Cheryl Molennor

Gallery: AvianPosted February 19, 2010143 views13 comments
We have chicks! So exciting to watch all morning this family with 2 chicks. My attempt at flight kept bringing me dark images needing work on the shadows, leaving me with a not so perfect image but I liked this take-off
Canon 7D 300 mm 2.8 L w 2x entender
ISO 250 f8 @1/640 hh

Comments

13 comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on February 19, 2010 at 5:47 PM
Great shot Cheryl. The larger version show nice detail given the poor light under the wings. The sharpness is good considering the relatively slow SS. The head feathers look a bit funny, like NR was applied to that area, but it may just be my eyes.

For those inquiring about AF versus MF and using the 2X extender. When used with the 300 2.8 AF still functions. Keep in mind that many non-pro Canon camera bodies need a minimum wide open aperture setting of f/5.6 for autofocus to work. Canon 1-Series camera bodies generally require f/8 for autofocus to work. 2 x 2.8 = 5.6 so AF works on the 7D Cheers.
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Dubois on February 19, 2010 at 8:34 PM
Nice timing Cheryl. I think your metering is probably getting fooled by the light sky. One option for this sort of situation is to use manual exposure. Another is to dial in an exposure compensation (ie +2/3) or so to get what looks right to you. In either case you will end up with a brighter sky as well as a lighter exposure in the under wing areas.
Registered on February 22, 2005, 129 Posts, 4739 Comments
Comment posted by Angela McCain on February 19, 2010 at 9:26 PM
Really good. The head detail and sharpness are excellent-as are the feet and talons. I'll bet that 7D can handle a higher ISO too. But I'm not sure why anyone is giving YOU advice. We should be taking it.
Registered on April 19, 2009, 367 Posts, 3589 Comments
Comment posted by Keith Bauer on February 19, 2010 at 9:39 PM
Nice timing Cheryl. Agree that it is a bit dark. I routinely shoot at +2/3 to +1 1/3 when shooting birds in flight against a relatively light sky like this one. You still have enough detail to pull on this one that post processing can help rescue the darkest parts of the image.
Registered on November 20, 2003, 458 Posts, 4836 Comments
Comment posted by SandyRichardsBrown on February 19, 2010 at 10:05 PM
Excellent!
You guys have chicks already? I'm movin' THERE...
Great capture of action here.
Sandy r
Registered on November 24, 2003, 3937 Posts, 12909 Comments
Comment posted by István Molnár on February 20, 2010 at 12:03 AM
Cool shot.Moment caught well.
István :toast:
Registered on January 7, 2010, 114 Posts, 704 Comments
Comment posted by Cheryl Molennor on February 20, 2010 at 8:10 AM
Hey, Thanks everybody. i'm a bit challenged on metering these guys because of the white heads. I was shooting -2 or so but somehow not on this shot which is great cause it would be even darker. Some of you are saying shoot on the +side? what about the whites? Thanks so very much. Also no manual focusing as Ron described :wavey:
Registered on June 30, 2009, 300 Posts, 5051 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on February 20, 2010 at 11:09 AM
Very nice timing and a good shot in tough light.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by Ed Dubois on February 20, 2010 at 4:16 PM
Hi Cheryl,

The whites will depend pretty much on the amount of sunlight and the angle the light hits the head. I think test shots and watching your histogram closely to see that you're exposing to the right without blowing the highlights and getting 'blinkies' is the trick. I find bright overcast is my preferred light for bald eagles just because of the high contrast but regardless of light they can be tricky.
Registered on February 22, 2005, 129 Posts, 4739 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on February 21, 2010 at 8:55 AM
Cheryl,

I like the great wing spread here, just a little dark under the wings. Exposing a dark bird against the sky is a challenge every time they are photographed because there is much to take into consideration. Your whites are not even close to being over exposed in this image so I would have used positive EV compensation for this image.

Increasing your ISO when using aperture priority would have given you a fast shutter speed, which you need for flight shots.

I may have left more room in front of the eagle and taken a bit off of the right side, to where the M is in images on your copyright line.

All of that said though, I like this as posted.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by Sally King on February 21, 2010 at 10:46 AM
Excellent timing. Can't wait to see some images of the chicks.
Registered on December 2, 2008, 416 Posts, 4450 Comments
Comment posted by Howard Cheek on February 21, 2010 at 8:05 PM
Great capture Cheryl, where was this BTW?
I made a couple of trips to a nest here in Texas at Llano right off the highway, but slightly out of reach with my setup.
I had the same problem shooting the eagle against a bright sky, they're tough to expose correctly..
Well done :smile:
Registered on July 24, 2008, 1201 Posts, 10758 Comments
Comment posted by Steve Robinson on February 22, 2010 at 9:38 PM
You've made a great shot here Cheryl. Eagles at the moment of takeoff make for an exciting image. :smile:

I've recently started shooting eagles too and had to work on my exposures. I've been using center weighted exposure and +1 EV with pretty fair results with a medium bright sky. Next I'll probably go to +2 EV.

Good shooting.
Registered on December 20, 2007, 21 Posts, 42 Comments