Snow Mouth
by Marsel van Oosten
I'm just a few weeks away from my next trip to Japan, so I decided to re-evaluate the material I shot on last year's Japan workshop.
Most people are used to seeing these photogenic Japanese macaques (aka snow monkeys) sitting in natural hot springs. And although they do spend considerable time in the nice warm water - at times I really wanted to join them - they don't bathe forever. I actually liked photographing them outside the water just as much, because it was fascinating to see their behavior in the snow, and they just look very pretty in the snow with their red faces.
I followed this male for a while as it was foraging for food, digging in the snow. I got down low, spot metered off the snow and dialed in some extra exposure to get it truly white, and added some fill flash to brighten the face and the eyes.
Nikon D2x, AF-S VR 70-200/2.8, 1/250 @ f/5.6, ISO 100, hand held
Comments
15 commentsI used a soft edged mask to selectively adjust the contrast of the macaque, but I can't see the grey halo.
I suspect either your monitor is not callibrated or you're using an lcd screen?
When I make very drastic contrast adjustments to the image I can see the grey halo you're talking about, but on all the monitors in my house, I can't see it.
Do more people see this halo?
As for the halo, I see it as well, though I'm on a cheap dell LCD monitor at work, not sure how it would appear on my other monitor at home but things are usually much better on that.
- Luke
I have a 24" Imac and in the calibrated LCD i just see a very, very soft grey halo, but don't disturb me at all.
I have a calibrated 27" iMac, and there's a slight halo, but it doesn't bother me at all. Great work!
-Cam
I will recalibrate my monitor tomorrow (I've been getting warning messages for quite some time now anyway) and have a closer look at the mask I made. Usually this kind of subtleties don't show against 99% of natural backgrounds, but a white background is pretty relentless.
As always, technically very good (to excellent). The exposure on the macaque in particular is superb and you handled the flash-fill (and post-processing) perfectly. Regarding the halo - it's visible on my laptop and my intentionally slightly out of calibration 20" monitor, but virtually invisible on my "real" (and carefully calibrated) 30" image-editing monitor. I think you're absolutely right that the white background is very, very demanding. I suspect that the halo will be visible to many viewers and will detract from the image for them, so perhaps using the soft-edge mask used here isn't the best choice for this particular presentation style (by this I mean that the image will be viewed by a lot of folks with monitors either out of calibration or calibrated differently than your's so they'll have a less-than-optimal experience while viewing this excellent image).
Halo aside, I have to admit that I find that the lower macaque-snow border is more of a distraction to me than the halo. In a sense I can't envision a scenario (other than blowing snow, I suppose) where there would be such a distinct difference in image sharpness between two areas that are so close together (i.e., the totally blurred snow that's virtually touching the monkey vs. the exceptionally sharp fur of the monkey). I suppose it's possible that the snow I'm referring to is actually a snowbank that's at a distance from the monkey (and much closer to you than the monkey is) but, given the absolute lack of detail in the snow - and thus the paucity of depth clues here - to my eye the out-of-focus foreground snow does appear to be right against the monkey. And, to me, this sharpness differential of apparently adjoining zones is somewhat discordant. Hope this makes sense to you...
Cheers...thanks for sharing this...
Brad
It's a snowbank somewhere halfway between the camera and the monkey. There is still detail in the snow in the original raw file, but I chose to get rid of it during processing.
Thanks for your feedback.
~ja