Nature Photographers Network
This is the preserved archive of the original Nature Photographers Network. The community continues at naturephotographers.network.
Trumpeter?
‹ PreviousAvian GalleryNext ›

Trumpeter?

by Jimmie Fata

Gallery: AvianPosted December 31, 200991 views8 comments
Happy New Year Everyone!

Was out yesterday in Massapequa State Park (Long Island) and captured two swans on a pond. One was a Tundra and the other which I am presenting here I believe is a Trumpeter (apparently a rarity in these parts).

Please provide much needed bird confirmation, advice and criticism.

Taken with a Canon Rebel XTi EFS 55-250 f4.5-5.6 IS
ISO 400 1/125 f/5.6

60% crop of total image, sharpened swan.

Comments

8 comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on December 31, 2009 at 8:59 PM
First the critique.

You got a pretty good angle on the bird and handled the whites/detail on the neck in particular quite well. It would be best to see the reflection instead of the empty space up top. One common mistake when photographing a big bird like this is to leave the focus on centerpoint and get the head in focus - which of course is what you want to do. The problem is that it throws off the composition, so the focal point should be adjusted for better composition which would have allowed for a full reflection.

Now for the ID. I can say with near certainty that this is a Tundra swan. I base this on the absence of the pink line along the beak and the fact that you saw 1 other Tundra. Swans are often seen in pairs, so it is much more likely you would have a pair of Tundra swans, as opposed to a not so common Tundra swan and a very rare Trumpeter Swan. Additionally, a pair of Tundra swans have been reported at that location earlier in the week, so, sorry to disappoint but it's a Tundra.

- Luke
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Bielefeld on January 1, 2010 at 8:39 AM
Jimmie, I like the angle of the bird and the nice head turn. The comp would be much stronger with a lot more space on the right and much less on the left as the bird is looking to the right. From the vege at the bottom I take it there was probably no more reflection to be had so the room up top is fine IMO. The bird overall is a bit soft and a catchlight in the eye would have helped liven up the bird more. Just some suggestions for the future. :smile:
Registered on December 6, 2008, 360 Posts, 7132 Comments
Comment posted by Mia McPherson on January 1, 2010 at 9:02 AM
Jimmie,

Ron B. covered every thing I would have addressed, so I will just say I echo his comments.
Registered on June 25, 2007, 491 Posts, 12566 Comments
Comment posted by dan elster on January 1, 2010 at 10:29 AM
I agree with the others about the composition..

.I'm also wanting to say this isn't a tundra swan, but a mute swan. A tundra swan has a black bill and usually a yellow spot in front of the eye. This bird does not have a black bill and has a knob on top of the bill. While this image doesn't show the characteristic orange bill of a mute swan, it could be an immature one, but I'm also wondering why the entire image is lacking color, did you convert it to black and white?
Registered on September 23, 2005, 299 Posts, 2443 Comments
Comment posted by Jim DeWitt on January 1, 2010 at 1:43 PM
Jimmie -

Nice photo and interesting comp. I agree with Ron on his suggestions.

I've got to disagree with Luke; This is a Mute Swan. A two-toned bill - black and grey - is a very good field mark fro a sub-adult Mute Swan. Additionally, a Trumpeter has a wedge-shaped bill, like you'd use to split wood; a Tundra and a Mute Swan have a "ski-jump profile." A Tundra always has yellow on its bill (the bill itself in a sub-adult; the base of the bill in an adult). So, by elimination, a Mute Swan.
Registered on August 28, 2006, 1240 Posts, 8506 Comments
Comment posted by KC Choo on January 1, 2010 at 4:15 PM
I'd go with the Mute Swan for ID. I also agree with the suggested composition.
Registered on November 15, 2004, 519 Posts, 8278 Comments
Comment posted by Luke Ormand on January 1, 2010 at 6:37 PM
I stand corrected! I let the knowledge of Tundra Swans being seen at this location (and my complete lack of experience seeing them) get in the way. But at least I was right in explaining it wasn't a Trumpeter!

- Luke
Registered on February 4, 2009, 1093 Posts, 7035 Comments
Comment posted by Ron Dudley on January 1, 2010 at 6:44 PM
Whatever the species it's certainly a beautiful swan Jimmie. I do wish for a bit more sharpness and that the bird were further to the left in the frame.
Registered on March 30, 2007, 437 Posts, 10915 Comments